Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Does Bryce have any further excuses for this upcoming year?


Recommended Posts

30 minutes ago, TheBigKat said:

He has more tools now then Cam had

Not buying that.

Cam had Double Trouble, Smitty, Olsen, and Shockey.

We don't have players that match any of that.

But, yes, I do think Bryce has less room for excuses going into year 2.

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just for the record…

Last year, going into the season….Bryce had an all star coaching staff and folks here said we had a O roster that rivaled the 2003 Super Bowl team around him.  
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, rayzor said:

Not buying that.

Cam had Double Trouble, Smitty, Olsen, and Shockey.

We don't have players that match any of that.

But, yes, I do think Bryce has less room for excuses going into year 2.

 

Gross, Wharton, and Kalil.  Kalil was HUGE for Cam. 

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Tbe said:

Not ready to say that yet.

He was ‘setup for success’ last year too, and we see how that went.

Was he? The guards we trotted out there were practice squad level. AT was the only WR trying. Chuba was the only RB with consistency. And... our offensive coach was playing an outdated offense. Hurst showed up for two games. Not saying Young is the answer but I'm giving him a mulligan. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, CRA said:

Just for the record…

Last year, going into the season….Bryce had an all star coaching staff and folks here said we had a O roster that rivaled the 2003 Super Bowl team around him.  
 

 

How could he complain when HE was the one that looked that bad?  HE needs to be the one proving to everyone he can play in this league. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When they measure velocity they base it on an average of 3 throws, I think, could be 5. Each qb decides how he throws it. It's not taken from passes in a game. So basing on an "eye test" takes out bias. It's measured by a radar gun in a controlled environment. 
    • I think the long term is when this stuff pays off. You have to set it all up and get all the big dogs on the same page.  So if you have the right guy set it up, assigning all the values, you are ahead of the game and he seems to be the top guy. Figures Tepper would be attracted to having the Top analytics guy. Okay with me I guess. If they get to the point where I am mad they didn’t kick or go for it, it means they are doing okay. Cause I haven’t thought that mattered much for several years. 
    • Velocity MPH. Okay, that’s a number in isolation. what if CJ has a nice 85% effort motion that does what he is looking for? And Young has to step into things to get even 2 mph behind him?  I don’t KNOW that about either it is just an example of numbers don’t always tell all, but when I look at Young throw it reminds me of someone like Fran Tarkenton. A throwback non athletic weak armed scrambler for those of you who don’t remember. Had a great career in the old smaller slower but much meaner NFL. Would not today, IMO.  I think the arm strength questions, are plenty fair. And the eyeball test, it does mean something. Who would take Bryce Young over CJ Stroud or Richardson based on his arm? It is obvious to the naked eye where they stack up.
×
×
  • Create New...