Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 Draft: Day 3 (Rounds 4-7)


Bear Hands
 Share

Recommended Posts

28 minutes ago, TD alt said:

I wouldn't count out Rice either, though @CRA doesn't want him.

I mean, where matters.  I didn’t want him at the top of the 4th at 101 given what was there.  Have it now. Looks like 32 teams thought the same that round 

I loved Ruke.   Would have hated him where Atl got him. 

I would have loved Shipley where the Eagles got him.  4th is my ideal spot for building a RB committee.  A drafted committee is all I want at RB.  Featured RBs is old era football.  Would have hated him in the 2nd. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Pazhoosier89 said:

Why is the Mizzou CB Kris Abrams-Draine dropping? Most places had him as a solid 2nd rounder.

He is tops on my board---not in any order, but the bold items are of interest to me:

Austin Booker Edge Kansas

Cam Hart CB N Dame

Brenden Rice WR USC

Christian Jones OT Texas (again?)

Kris Abrams-Draine CB Missouri*

Malik Washington WR Virginia

Sedric Van Pron-Granger C Georgia*

Caelen Carson CB Wake

Mohamed Kamara Edge Colorado*

Hunter Nourzad C Penn State

DJ James CB Auburn

Jarvis Brownlee, Louisville*

Beaux Limmer  C Arkansas

Javon Solomon, Edge Troy

Nehemiah Pritchett CB Auburn*

Edited by MHS831
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

I mean, where matters.  I didn’t want him at the top of the 4th at 101 given what was there.  Have it now.

I loved Ruke.   Would have hated him where Atl got him. 

I would have loved Shipley where the Eagles got him.  4th is my ideal spot for building a RB committee.  A drafted committee is all I want at RB.  Featured RBs is old era football.  Would have hated him in the 2nd. 

True. That qualification makes it much more understandable. I didn't want him with 101 either. It wouldn't have made much sense given who was still available. I think that we made the correct choice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Troys99x4 said:

I know they’d never do it to Bryce, and don’t hate on me for saying this. But if Rattler is there… I’d take him. Let him know that Bryce is the guy, but why not?

To be fair to Rattler he matured a lot the last two years and had a really bad OL last season.  The problem with him is that he isn’t very consistent 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, CarolinaLivin said:

Have to wonder what that means for others in their wr room

Deebo or Aiyuk one is gonna end up being traded. I'm surprised it didn't happen during or leading up to the draft.  Must not have liked the offers and they're waiting on an injury and/or training camp realization of 'uh oh, we NEED a WR" to set in to up the value.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Troys99x4 said:

I know they’d never do it to Bryce, and don’t hate on me for saying this. But if Rattler is there… I’d take him. Let him know that Bryce is the guy, but why not?

They could sign him as a udfa. Unless someone just has to have him and use a 7th on him. He's no threat to take anyone's job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Shocker said:

To be fair to Rattler he matured a lot the last two years and had a really bad OL last season.  The problem with him is that he isn’t very consistent 

Yep. Great arm talent. Shows some real flashes. But he's just never found any sort of consistency. Hard to imagine he'll find it in the NFL.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Shocker said:

To be fair to Rattler he matured a lot the last two years and had a really bad OL last season.  The problem with him is that he isn’t very consistent 

Yeah agreed. I truly do believe that Bryce will be the QB we drafted him to be. But it’s the NFL insurance is key and Canales could probably develop him, worst case scenario a really good backup. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • With the contract money an OT first rounder makes you can ALWAYS get a new girlfriend.  And probably an upgrade at that.  You only got 2 parents.
    • Brother. You are wholly confusing comparing situations and applying actual standards like most other franchises do like simply getting into a playoff series and winning at least 1 or 2 series games with praising. Nobody is praising the Hawks. Nobody is praising the Magic. Nobody here likes those teams. But reality is reality. The Hawks like other franchises have traded players fired coaches etc but they can still win a couple playoff games. How is that not the bare floor for you or anyone else? What are we doing here if it isn't? We've seen eye to eye on many things over the years. But you are in the camp on the Hornets where you are emotionally attached to LaMelo where you feel the need to carry his water like he's got that juice. That's cool that you feel that way. It's your prerogative. But I differ from that viewpoint entirely. If he had that juice we would not have gotten wiped off the court in 2 play in games with 2 different coaching staffs and rosters. if people don't like hearing that well I'm sorry but how the hell is this team ever going to get better and ultimately go anywhere in the postseason if we just blindly pat them on the back for getting their asses whooped before they actually even get into the real playoffs? There seem to be some Bryce Young level standards being applied here. That's wild to me. But to each his own.
    • Proctor/Freeling were always the belles of the ball where we were picking. What those two *could* become at OT was far greater than what others could be at their respective positions and I’m glad our FO could see that. 
×
×
  • Create New...