Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 After Draft Roster


KillerKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, BIGH2001 said:

You should put (IR) next to Jaycee Horn. If Evero has this defense performing at a high level again he should be a HC somewhere next year. Still lacking quality depth and starters at several positions on that side.

Outside of CB 2 (unless you like Dane Jackson) where are starters absent on defense...

Woods, and Fuller

Horn, Jackson, Hill (Nickel)

Shaq, Jewell

Clowney, Wonnum

Brown, Tuttle, Robinson

---------------------------------

Where is the gap for a starter? If we plug in Gilmore this defense is better on paper than 23'.

 

Edited by SetfreexX
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, SetfreexX said:

Outside of CB 2 (unless you like Dane Jackson) where are starters absent on defense...

Woods, and Fuller

Horn, Jackson, Hill (Nickel)

Shaq, Jewell

Clowney, Wonnum

Brown, Tuttle, Robinson

---------------------------------

Where is the gap for a starter? If we plug in Gilmore this defense is better on paper than 23'.

 

I dunno if we are better unless you think clowney is better than burns and joey is better than luvu...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Martin said:

Yes it was confirmed that Tuttle is the NT. 

Does that not seem odd? Robinson is the known better talent for that position. Was there a logic given? Seems a real head scratcher to me. Not to mention that Brown and Robinson both weigh more than Tuttle. The smallest starter is at Nose?! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Byrdman4real said:

I heard he will be a June 1 cut

We can do that now unless we have already used our allotment of designated June 1 cuts.  After just looking at his cap hit, we hang onto Sanders for a season. There's not a whole lot of difference in cutting him now versus June 1.  He's not horrible, just not starter material.  That would simply create another hole to fill and have to pay someone else.

Edited by 45catfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

We can do that now unless we have already used our allotment of designated June 1 cuts.  After just looking at his cap hit, we hang onto Sanders for a season. There's not a whole lot of difference in cutting him now versus June 1.  He's not horrible, just not starter material.  That would simply create another hole to fill and have to pay someone else.

image.thumb.png.0906a7d2dda1bf34c500660efa0e5a55.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MHS831 said:

image.thumb.png.0906a7d2dda1bf34c500660efa0e5a55.png

Here is what I do--you might want to put Brooks on the IR to start the season--that means he misses the first 4 to 7 games.  He can use the time learning the offense better and strengthening the knee.  Meanwhile, running behind the new OL, Hubbard and Sanders can hold it down.  After four games, the Panthers have a 21-day window to activate Brooks.  We could put Sanders on the block during that time, trying to get a trade for him.  If not, after week 7, put him the bench (inactive) then cut him June 2, 2025 and the cap hit is only $1,475,000 per year.  If Brooks enters the lineup on Week 8, for example, we'd get a fresh RB on a stronger knee midseason.  Not the best situation, but we can take a negative situation (Sanders not working out; Brooks' rehab) and make it work to our benefit more than cutting him outright.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Panthero said:

Does that not seem odd? Robinson is the known better talent for that position. Was there a logic given? Seems a real head scratcher to me. Not to mention that Brown and Robinson both weigh more than Tuttle. The smallest starter is at Nose?! 

From what I understand he’s supposed to be very very good as a 3-4 end, I personally really like it (but I couldn’t be further from an expert). What surprised me the most is that we didn’t try to get a real NT and use Tuttle as the first backup end. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Here is what I do--you might want to put Brooks on the IR to start the season--that means he misses the first 4 to 7 games.  He can use the time learning the offense better and strengthening the knee.  Meanwhile, running behind the new OL, Hubbard and Sanders can hold it down.  After four games, the Panthers have a 21-day window to activate Brooks.  We could put Sanders on the block during that time, trying to get a trade for him.  If not, after week 7, put him the bench (inactive) then cut him June 2, 2025 and the cap hit is only $1,475,000 per year.  If Brooks enters the lineup on Week 8, for example, we'd get a fresh RB on a stronger knee midseason.  Not the best situation, but we can take a negative situation (Sanders not working out; Brooks' rehab) and make it work to our benefit more than cutting him outright.

From what I heard it was a clean ACL break, and not a tear, so it should heal relatively quick. He has already started running and cutting, so he should be 100% ready to go by training camp. So I expect him to be a day 1 starter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, micnificent28 said:

I dunno if we are better unless you think clowney is better than burns and joey is better than luvu...

I think it's a push. I do not know enough about Joey to know if he is better than Luvu but the stats are about the same I think. Clowney is better than Burns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Martin said:

From what I understand he’s supposed to be very very good as a 3-4 end, I personally really like it (but I couldn’t be further from an expert). What surprised me the most is that we didn’t try to get a real NT and use Tuttle as the first backup end. 

Agreed, I think Tuttle is a poor choice as the starter at nose. Better as a backup at end to brown and Robinson (since they insist on slotting him there).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That may be true but not having a competent and talented safety is what let Stafford cook us down the field in almost less than 1 minute and bouncing us out the playoffs.  Scott is a liability in each level of the game IMO and a versatile player at that position can completely change the look of a defense just as much as a pass rusher. Knocked down passes big moments, turnovers, TFL, QB pressures on blitzes, etcetera.   I'm  not saying you don't want us to draft a safety, but most of us should agree that WE NEEEED a lights out safety on this team finally.  If DM moves up a spot before Vikings and not give up much to snag him for us I won't be mad in slightest. This kid is a DAWG and I believe he could possibly be a staple on this defense the likes of the guys we still sing praises for Peppers, Kuechly, Davis, Rucker, Beason, Morgan, Gamble..............Thieneman? 
    • https://www.espn.com/nfl/draft2026/story/_/id/48494162/2026-nfl-draft-32-teams-positions-picks-grades-predictions-needs-solak#car
    • Picks: Nos. 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 I'm extremely excited for the Panthers' 2026 draft. How could you not be? After two straight offseasons of aggressive defensive spending, coordinator Ejiro Evero's unit looks ready to make the leap. Jaelan Phillips and Devin Lloydfill out two of the biggest gaps on the roster, though the Panthers should not be discounted from drafting a top edge rusher early. Phillips is a major injury risk and not a sack artist, so he doesn't fully solve the Panthers' 5.3% sack rate from last season (27th in the league). The Panthers might be the Akheem Mesidor(Miami) team, as they need his production immediately. The Panthers are also often tagged as the Kenyon Sadiq team, which is very possible. No one among Tommy Tremble, Ja'Tavion Sanders and Mitchell Evans has played his way into an unquestioned starting role. But the Panthers do have three tight ends on the roster, two of whom are on rookie contracts. Sadiq would fit nicely in Dave Canales' offense, which has a dynamic screen game and schemes up targets well. But I'd like to see an accompanying move to make room at the position for Sadiq's snaps to love the pick. There's much more room at wide receiver, where a second three-level option to run besides Offensive Rookie of the Year Tetairoa McMillan could really bust open this offense. I could see an early pick spent in the secondary, which might come as a surprise to some. Slot corner Chau Smith-Wade has been fine but could be improved upon if an elite nickel option is available at No. 51 (think D'Angelo Ponds from Indiana or Keionte Scottfrom Miami). Depth behind the outside corners is also quite thin, and Mike Jackson (29 years old) is in a contract year, so a player with inside-out versatility would have even more value. Clemson's Avieon Terrell, anyone? The Panthers can also buttress the slot by drafting a safety with good man coverage traits to play opposite Tre'von Moehrig, as neither Lathan Ransom nor Nick Scott has emphatically secured that role. Treydan Stukes(Arizona) is another option who would make a lot of sense at No. 51. Bottom line: Wide receiver, pass rusher and defensive back are the big needs. Attack them aggressively -- this is the end of Bryce Young's rookie contract, so it's time to push
×
×
  • Create New...