Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: RB Jonathon Brooks (knee) may not be ready for the start of training camp.


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, TD alt said:

I mean, it's easy to discount the prevailing thought that if healthy Brooks was probably going to go in the first round. We took a chance, only inasmuch as he had an Injury, but with his prognosis judged to be pretty positive, we may have acquired a first round talent---thay is, a game-changing three-down back in the second round. As questionable as our talent is at the position, I have no issue with it. We aren't developing into a powerhouse in one season, so we can afford to take a chance.

The only way he should have gone in the 1st is because it was such a weak RB class and not because he woukd have been such a great 1st round pick. Game changing 3 down back?

 

11 hours ago, Jackie Lee said:

I mean it's not like he was a knockout 1st round prospect before the injury, it's just an undervalued position and a week class on top of that. Texas O-line makes it easy for RB's and I concur with these negatives from the Bleacher Report draft profile

On the flip side, Brooks is not a strong runner. He is on the lighter side at 207 pounds, and it shows. Brooks struggles to run through contact at the line of scrimmage, and he regularly goes down on first contact at the second level. He rarely pushes piles or finds extra yards.

Brooks isn't a decisive or commanding runner, either. He often gets himself in trouble at the line of scrimmage. Brooks is not the type of runner who is okay with plunging ahead into a car wreck for three yards, even when that's the only option available. He leaves yards on the field as a result.

Brooks can be a useful committee back in the NFL with a chance to develop into something more. He has enough quickness and speed to be a weapon. Brooks isn't built like a true lead back, though, and he does not yet have the strength or decisiveness as a runner for that role.


GRADE: 7.0 (High-Level Backup/Potential Starter — 3rd Round)

 

It was a luxury pick and is more about next year then someone who could have helped this year at one of many positions of need. This entire draft showed more poor values and ignored concerns so SSDD.

Yes he has upside but again it's a RB. After trading a beast for a 2nd and change it makes it look even more hilarious of a miss swing on a team desperate to add talent on the field and not in the imaginations of the people in charge. Also when was the last time the Panthers drafted a project that lived up to their ceiling on this team? And the first 3 picks in this draft were projects which would be exciting on a playoff team but not a 2 win team IMO.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Waldo said:

The only way he should have gone in the 1st is because it was such a weak RB class and not because he woukd have been such a great 1st round pick. Game changing 3 down back?

 

It was a luxury pick and is more about next year then someone who could have helped this year at one of many positions of need. This entire draft showed more poor values and ignored concerns so SSDD.

Yes he has upside but again it's a RB. After trading a beast for a 2nd and change it makes it look even more hilarious of a miss swing on a team desperate to add talent on the field and not in the imaginations of the people in charge. Also when was the last time the Panthers drafted a project that lived up to their ceiling on this team? And the first 3 picks in this draft were projects which would be exciting on a playoff team but not a 2 win team IMO.

The panthers have to be on the working theory that Brooks deal is for 4 years.  There is no way Morgan should be planning to give him another deal when the time comes.  Free agent RB and 2nd year deals have never worked for the panthers.  Like ever.  Morgan has to know this.  So under that premise we are blowing one year on brooks because he will not be 100% and then hoping to get 3 good years from him from there assuming he can get healthy.  Thats just not a gamble a team like the panthers can make especially what they gave up for him.  Its just not.  You could have gotten a rb that wasnt hurt in the 3rd or 4rth and be more productive this year then brooks.

  • Beer 2
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, TheSpecialJuan said:
Panthers coach Dave Canales said rookie RB Jonathon Brooks (knee) may not be ready for the start of training camp.
Canales also said Brooks has a ways to go before he is ready and the team will ease him into training camp. Brooks suffered a torn ACL late in his final season at Texas and is still recovering from the injury. Previous reports were optimistic that Brooks would be cleared by training camp, but Canales and the Panthers are now pumping the breaks. Chuba Hubbard and Miles Sanders are the next men up on Carolina’s depth chart. Hubbard proved far more effective than Sanders last year and would likely get the first crack at the starting gig if Brooks misses any time.

if this author thought that Brooks was the day 1 starter when healthy they need a new job

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, t96 said:

uhh our roster and team expectations are exactly at a point where we can afford to sit/develop players. We need to build out a core and add talented players for the future period, nobody is expecting us to compete/contend this year. Teams solidly in their window (like the Chiefs, Bills, etc.) are ones who can't afford to use high picks or cap space on players who won't contribute immediately. 

I'd argue the main reason the Chiefs went back to back was their ability to draft immediate impact players the last 2 years. As a team squarely in the beginning of a rebuild we don't care about immediate impact, just starting to get some damn impact players at all. If they take a few years to develop so be it, we're not losing anything right now.

Well said and well thought. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

The panthers have to be on the working theory that Brooks deal is for 4 years.  There is no way Morgan should be planning to give him another deal when the time comes.  Free agent RB and 2nd year deals have never worked for the panthers.  Like ever.  Morgan has to know this.  So under that premise we are blowing one year on brooks because he will not be 100% and then hoping to get 3 good years from him from there assuming he can get healthy.  Thats just not a gamble a team like the panthers can make especially what they gave up for him.  Its just not.  You could have gotten a rb that wasnt hurt in the 3rd or 4rth and be more productive this year then brooks.

With how this offseason unfolded it looks like it will be the next people in charge's problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ricky Prickles said:

This person consistently shows a fully functional brain and is able to use it quite frequently without grabbing his pitchfork and rushing the castle at midnight angrily with ever shred of news that is not exactly what we hope for.

I get the sentiment. Our franchise is literally in shambles and there is really next to no hope of any improvement. As our former coach loved to say, it is what it is.

I hope that he doesn't end up a bust because we really can't afford to keep reaching on picks like we did with Brooks and then whiffing. 

I wouldn't expect much, if any, impact from Brooks in 2024. Even if the ACL is healed, it isn't abnormal for players to take several weeks or months even after they are 100% to fully "trust" their knee again. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, t96 said:

uhh our roster and team expectations are exactly at a point where we can afford to sit/develop players. We need to build out a core and add talented players for the future period, nobody is expecting us to compete/contend this year. Teams solidly in their window (like the Chiefs, Bills, etc.) are ones who can't afford to use high picks or cap space on players who won't contribute immediately. 

I'd argue the main reason the Chiefs went back to back was their ability to draft immediate impact players the last 2 years. As a team squarely in the beginning of a rebuild we don't care about immediate impact, just starting to get some damn impact players at all. If they take a few years to develop so be it, we're not losing anything right now.

Posters looking for something negative to say aren't going to understand this. The thing that has me willing to be somewhat positive and hopeful for the future is what Dan Morgan said about drafting talent again. We have just been drafting guys that aren't talented period and it has showed watching guys like Chuba bang their head against the ceiling of their talent. He is the best of the Rhule era. I remember when our worst defensive lineman was Al Wallace! We have been devoid of talent for years and Morgan got me excited saying he wants to draft Stewarts, Kuechlys, generational talent. So if it takes drafting a future all-pro back a year early with an injury and waiting on him to get healthy, why would you whine about it? Oh that's right, these guys whine about everything. This kid will be a stud and the LB with bone on bone conditions everybody wanted will be out of the league like Van der Esch or whatever his name is soon enough. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, RJK said:

It’s not even really about Brooks, maybe he’ll be good. There were better players that fit bigger needs available. Just more roster and draft mismanagement which points to nothing changing anytime soon. 

Team hasn't even taken a snap this year and we are already talking about wait till next year. This was a luxury pick that I don't think is going to pan out unless hes a reincarnation of Thomas Davis. The NFL breaks players why draft one already broke...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People keep saying its just a RB, but we see what happens when even the Chiefs can't run the ball. Just because the talking heads say RB is a throw away position, if you know football you know they are extremely important in today's NFL. They are still needed and one dimensional teams that can only pass with zero running threat get schemed into losses. Christian just got a huge two year extension and the 9ers are the toast of the NFC! But yeah, drafting impact running backs are for dinosaur GMs. Insert face palm emoticon. We needed a running back for the future and got the best one in the draft according to every analyst. Only the Huddle can think of a thousand posts to make that the worst thing ever. 

  • Pie 4
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, NorthTryon said:

People keep saying its just a RB, but we see what happens when even the Chiefs can't run the ball. Just because the talking heads say RB is a throw away position, if you know football you know they are extremely important in today's NFL. They are still needed and one dimensional teams that can only pass with zero running threat get schemed into losses. Christian just got a huge two year extension and the 9ers are the toast of the NFC! But yeah, drafting impact running backs are for dinosaur GMs. Insert face palm emoticon. We needed a running back for the future and got the best one in the draft according to every analyst. Only the Huddle can think of a thousand posts to make that the worst thing ever. 

THIS OMFG 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, NorthTryon said:

People keep saying its just a RB, but we see what happens when even the Chiefs can't run the ball. Just because the talking heads say RB is a throw away position, if you know football you know they are extremely important in today's NFL. They are still needed and one dimensional teams that can only pass with zero running threat get schemed into losses. Christian just got a huge two year extension and the 9ers are the toast of the NFC! But yeah, drafting impact running backs are for dinosaur GMs. Insert face palm emoticon. We needed a running back for the future and got the best one in the draft according to every analyst. Only the Huddle can think of a thousand posts to make that the worst thing ever. 

Can't be impactful if he can't get on the field. Even if he did he would be # 3 this year anyways. They needed to be focusing on the now and worry about the future if they want to keep their jobs, it's a luxury no one in that house can afford except the owners. The last HC didn't make it 1 season and no one has lasted more than 3 since Tepper showed up doing very similar stuff. But please go on like the people criticizing this isn't based in recent facts. Also comparing this guy to CMC is delusive AF. CMC could block and catch as a healthy (played 16 and started 10) rookie. 

I get being tired of the criticism and anger that is touching every angle of the organization at this point but it's as surprising as this guy not being ready yet...which is the base of the criticism given the RB room he isn't ready to help to improve much right now is he?

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Johnstonny said:

Team hasn't even taken a snap this year and we are already talking about wait till next year. This was a luxury pick that I don't think is going to pan out unless hes a reincarnation of Thomas Davis. The NFL breaks players why draft one already broke...

I was a luxury pick because IMO because it was reaching for a position at a time that just wasn't necessary. I am all for BPA but I don't believe Brooks will be significantly better than some of the other guys in the 3rd to 4th round. Not enough to warrant passing on better players of higher positional value. That's not even touching the roster needs specifically.

That was always my problem with the pick. It's, once again, the team projecting that they just know better than everyone else when that has so very rarely proven to be the case in the last few years.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Exactly what I was going to say. Brady seems to be taking a page out of Olsen's playbook, which is probably a good thing. They'll probably get around to giving Brady an Emmy one day, and he should thank Olsen for giving him the blueprint for success.
    • In before: "XL sucks, there is no hope." "As long as we have Bryce, none of this matters." My response: "It's X, not XL...we're not discussing apparel sizes, or we'd have to consider XS."  
    • Alain Pierre provides some food for thought on Last Word On Sports regarding Xavier Legette, and his article, though specifically on X, kind of puts me in the mind of QBs being overdrafted and put into situations that they're not prepared for, some ultimately failing due to drafting missteps by front offices who don't necessarily view prospective players within the contextual importance that situations demand.  At this point, Legette looks like a failure in reference to expectations, of not only what a consistently productive NFL receiver looks like, but a first round pick (which he obviously should never have been). But the story on X isn't necessarily completely over. Damn. I seem to be experiencing deja vu...It wasn't X's fault that he was overdrafted, that was a choice by an FO that obviously downplayed actual realized skill vs outstanding measurables and upside. Sure, the FO was impressed by X's one-year feats during his senior season at South Carolina, but it was the NFL god, RAS (a.k.a. Raw Athletic Score), that had Dave Canales's and Dan Morgan's jaws dropping in amazement at the sight of X running around in underwear at the Combine...   "At 6-foot-3 and over 220 pounds, Legette brought rare athletic upside to the position. His breakout season at South Carolina showed flashes of dominance that NFL teams dream of. Projecting forward, many scouts compared his physical profile to D.K. Metcalf, and the Panthers clearly believed they could develop him into a true wide receiver 1 over time. The issue was never his talent. The issue was the timeline. Just a few picks later, the Chargers selected Ladd McConkey, a receiver who may have lacked Xavier Legette’s physical ceiling but entered the league far more technically refined. McConkey immediately showed advanced route discipline, leverage awareness, good pacing, and separation ability.  Bryce Young’s game has always depended on timing and anticipation. His best football at Alabama came with receivers capable of winning through precision rather than pure athleticism. Jameson Williams and John Metchie III were excellent route runners and were able to get drafted in 2022. McConkey naturally fit that style of play. Legette, meanwhile, needed significant development in the exact areas where Bryce Young needed help. The Panthers drafted traits when Bryce Young needed reliability."   Yes, the FO was guilty. The good thing is that the execs appear to be improving. Some of that may be attributed to the hiring of Eric Eager (who was hired right after the Xavier Legette draft). Eager seems to have helped the Panthers FO fine-tune their analytical progress, and, at least on paper, they acquired players with a lot of value during the last draft in regards to actually (what I'll refer to as) "underdrafting" talent relative to their position with value already built in.  Look at Chris Brazzell: He may be more of the quintessential project receiver who was arguably more or less just as raw as Legette was when he was drafted, and with a relatively high RAS as well. The notable difference is value, as Brazzell was a round three pick and Legette was a first rounder.    "Unlike the Xavier Legette situation, Carolina’s environment for Brazzell is completely different. "The Panthers are not asking a raw receiver prospect to stabilize this offense for Bryce Young. "Brazzell enters a much healthier developmental situation with far less pressure. With Tetairoa McMillan established as the primary target and Jalen Coker continuing to settle as the number 2 option...Xavier Legette, Metchie III, and Jimmy Horn Jr. are also still in this rotation, fighting for reps. "It gives Carolina something they failed to give Legette when they drafted him: A developmental runway. "Xavier Legette entered the league with expectations attached to a first-round pick and an offense desperate for answers. Brazzell enters a room where he can spend a year working on his route running, learning the playbook, and earning snaps gradually rather than being asked to become part of Bryce Young’s solution immediately. "And truthfully, Brazzell needs that time coming out of college. Despite his elite physical tools, many evaluators have several concerns about his overall polish as a receiver. "His route tree at Tennessee was viewed as fairly limited due to the type of offense that they run. The receivers are expected to run a lot of choice routes, which are dictated by the placement of the defenders. It doesn’t require technical route-running and an understanding of the playbook needed at the NFL level...   "Context changes significantly when expectations change. "The Panthers are not depending on Brazzell to save the offense. They can allow him to develop slowly, expand his route tree, improve his technical refinement, and learn behind a much more stable receiver room... "Traits become much easier to bet on when patience is built into the plan."   It's all about understanding your situation. I don't agree that it's an inherently difficult choice like the author is suggesting in the following excerpt. At the very least, I think that it should be easier as long as all parties involved stay levelheaded and true to their process.    "That is what makes these draft decisions so difficult. "Every front office believes it can find the next Metcalf, Owens, or Marshall. Sometimes they do. More often, they are betting on a development path that may take years to complete. "The challenge is understanding what your offense needs right now. "If a team has patience, stability, and a quarterback capable of carrying the offense while a receiver develops, betting on traits can make sense. But if a young quarterback needs immediate help, there is a strong argument for prioritizing the receiver who already knows how to separate, create throwing , and earn trust from day one. "That’s why the Xavier Legette-Ladd McConkey debate remains so fascinating. "It was never really a discussion about talent. It was a discussion about timing."   For me, Ladd McConkey was talented enough in his own right, that the gap--the upside--was never as big as people are suggesting between not only McConkey and Legette, but McConkey and other receivers drafted in the first round during that draft. The technique divide between Ladd and X was pretty stark though, as was the roughly 35 pounds, but the speed was identical, the maybe 1½ height difference isn't huge (6' and 6'1"), and it may surprise some that Ladd's RAS (9.34) was also enough to put him in the top 10 percent of receivers since 1987. There is an argument that he would've been a better pick for Bryce and the Panthers, regardless of timeline and talent. But, I still appreciate the thesis (if you will) of the article, as it still provides some hope--perhaps a glimmer at this point, that X's RAS may finally translate to the NFL given more time, but, perhaps more importantly, it explains how Dan Morgan and company are showing improvement, even if it appears somewhat understated. My hope is that continued improvement is palpable by this time next year. https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2026/05/30/xavier-legette-draft-lessons/#google_vignette        
×
×
  • Create New...