Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bryce Young won't play in preseason opener


Recommended Posts

Just now, Jackie Lee said:

If I'm Canales I want to get at least a series with me on the headset, Bryce at qb, and Corbett at center in a game environment on the road so I know where we are at communication-wise. I'd much rather have that than go into week 1 assuming whatever happening in practice is going to automatically transfer over to an actual game

100 percent fair 

I’m under the impression that Canales doesn’t trust going into this matchup. Yeah that’s not good on paper but it’s a preseason game away and I never trust teams who “want to prove something” like new England who WILL be with us on the top 10 of the draft.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Panthercougar68 said:

100 percent fair 

I’m under the impression that Canales doesn’t trust going into this matchup. Yeah that’s not good on paper but it’s a preseason game away and I never trust teams who “want to prove something” like new England who WILL be with us on the top 10 of the draft.

Yeah, those were Bill squads that were willing to injure other teams in the preseason but I get that side of it. Actually I wish they had signed 2 camp arms just in case Plummer and Luton both get injured just so our wr depth guys can get fair shots

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, KSpan said:

I have zero faith in Canales until he gives me reason to, but that's a function of Teppee's ineptitude moreso than Canales himself.

Yeah I'm basically with you; but I do believe in letting these guys do their jobs.

I have absolved myself of getting too attached now, so however it goes this year I'll be having fun watching football on Sundays

  • Beer 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, KSpan said:

I have zero faith in Canales until he gives me reason to, but that's a function of Teppee's ineptitude moreso than Canales himself.

Yeah I'm not optimistic but I'm also not pessimistic about Canales.  I'm trying to be fair with him, but it's pretty hard with Dan given he's not new.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Jackie Lee said:

Seems like he's generally a Fox/Rivera/Wilks style run first guy but with just more pre snap motion. He's admitted he's not a young offensive play calling guru. I'm expecting 2012-18 Seahawks without the yolo balls which sounds super boring. Maybe some late stage Drew Brees dink and dunking mixed in

Yeah, which doesn’t sound like a formula for much success.  Seattle needed those YOLO plays and while old man Brees was successful he was a legit top 10 all time QB going into that neutered brand of football…..not just some hyped up super processors (which we while Bryce is smart isn’t actually that) 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/6/2024 at 3:51 PM, L-TownCat said:

I understand the jimmies being rustled and some of it is justified.  My counter to this is that o-line is a big ol hot pile of steaming trash.  Why get the munchkin murdered when it doesn’t count?

When you only win 2 or 3 games a year the entire season doesn’t matter. If he gets hurt then it will be an easy decision to say goodbye. Sink or swim time.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Jackie Lee said:

Seems like he's generally a Fox/Rivera/Wilks style run first guy but with just more pre snap motion. He's admitted he's not a young offensive play calling guru. I'm expecting 2012-18 Seahawks without the yolo balls which sounds super boring. Maybe some late stage Drew Brees dink and dunking mixed in

IMG_0861.thumb.jpeg.662db873aca882d0f7f1d9764fa97ffb.jpeg

He obviously uses motion a lot more than that dinosaur Reich but Canales is pretty much right in the middle  

 

 

Edited by *FreeFua*
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Jackie Lee said:

Interesting point 5 mins in. How come Bryce doesn't need the reps right now, but last season when we were out of any contention it was important for Bryce to finish out the season instead of seeing what the offense looked like with a proven vet like Dalton? 

Because clown show that’s why.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a quarter of preseason, game 1 in the new format, football. This is such a bad look from every angle if Bryce is healthy. Bryce being durable is his only positive trait on the NFL field to date anyways. The pre-season is just about to kick off for them and they are already a clown show. WTF has really changed since last year? They are going to run the ball so much more in the season but can't for quarter? Clown show must go on I guess. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Waldo said:

I can't wait to see the QB they pick after putting together this oline...

idk who is putting together or making the decisions  but whoever that might be probably Canales has Zavala as the starting LG with Damien Lewis out right now with injury & a healthy Brady Christensen on the bench unbelievable 

Canales oL is going to be big bodied &  RB friendly 

Edited by bandu
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Waldo said:

It's a quarter of preseason, game 1 in the new format, football. This is such a bad look from every angle if Bryce is healthy. Bryce being durable is his only positive trait on the NFL field to date anyways. The pre-season is just about to kick off for them and they are already a clown show. WTF has really changed since last year? They are going to run the ball so much more in the season but can't for quarter? Clown show must go on I guess. 

we are still largely the same clown show.  This isn't a rebuild.  We basically changed offensive playcaller and scheme.  Same owner, largely the same front office outside of a face swap, same QB, same O advisor, same D staff.  

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If Canales comes back and Bryce doesn’t I would probably prefer to bring in 3 guys he likes from around the league or maybe outside a top ten pick and work through them, give that a shot. Because if we win a few more games we won’t be in the running for the top rated QB prospects anyway. 
    • You mean tepper but yeah I agree about rhule   Baker is a top 3 potential qb that is play for mvp and he is doing it with a slew of injuries
    • There’s too many to reply to so I’ll just say a couple more things then I’m out: 1. It hasn’t been both ways and that’s the point. People saying stuff like “too bad Bryce Young didn’t make that tackle” is a direct result of the ridiculousness of blaming Bryce Young for literally everything. I remember one game day thread a poster unironically blamed Bryce Young for JT Sanders flipping onto his own neck and injuring himself. That post was pied. I literally just read a post blaming Bryce Young for XL dropping a ball on a would-be game winning drive last year. This past week, when Tmac bounced a ball off his hands for an interception, Bryce Young was immediately blamed in the game day thread. Alternatively, people who try to give credit to Bryce Young are immediately told that to credit Bryce Young is taking away credit from Rico Dowdle, OL, whoever, and that they shouldn’t be talking positively about Bryce Young because he doesn’t deserve any credit. 2. Yes, there have always been bad posters, the difference is that back then they were largely derided. Bryce Young’s rookie season, when many of us were simply pointing at the train wreck of the whole team and saying it was maybe a little tough to evaluate Bryce Young when he had no time to throw and slow receivers, and just saying basic stuff like “Bryce Young can physically throw the ball further than 20 yards.” There was an attempt made to limit all those opinions to a single thread, by a mod. This is like saying lunatics running the asylum is normal because there have always been lunatics in the asylum. The difference is before they were patients, now they’re in charge. 3. I know for a fact I am labeled as one of the “Bryce Stans” by many of the usual suspects, but the fact of the matter is they have no idea what my position is on Bryce Young because any attempts at nuanced discussion in the past have been so completely pointless due to never being able to get past the hyperbole. How can we have a serious conversation if you insist he is physically incapable of throwing a football 20 yards? Or if you insist that he somehow duped the Panthers into drafting him just by drinking water? Or if you insist that he should be able to succeed behind one of the worst offensive lines I’ve ever seen (rookie year, not now). And I’m not the only one, there are many who have left the huddle because of it and started a discord server, I’m just too lazy for another app.
×
×
  • Create New...