Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ranking every team’s QB3


JawnyBlaze
 Share

Recommended Posts

It's good that the rest of the league is seeing this. Everyone can get a good look at how not to run a football team. The Panthers had the worst starting QB in the league last season by a wide enough margin to fit a big rig through and our biggest concern was making said QB as comfortable as possible instead of doing what's best for the team.

Edited by frankw
  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Aussie Tank said:

You RAS slut 

With young third string QBs I'm an eye test slut. I don't give a fug about any other metric.

Just give me a guy who might be able to develop into something because if we're down to our third stringer we're probably fuged anyway.

Edited by LinvilleGorge
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

With young third string QBs I'm an eye test slut. I don't give a fug about any other metric.

Just give me a guy who might be able to develop into something because if we're down to our third stringer we're probably fuged anyway.

If we're playing our 3rd string QB they better be the best wildcat option in the league that can also launch it 60 yards standing still. Screw the playbook

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

So random. Some teams don’t even carry 3 QBs right? I mean look who is around us…. Eagles, Ravens, Bengals, Chiefs. 

& what do all those teams at the bottom of the list or let-s say ranking  have in common well they all have elite franchise Qbs 

Carolina on the other hand just think they have a franchise Qb & with the right players & coach will perform at an elite level 

Edited by bandu
Link to comment
Share on other sites

wait a minute I thought we hired a head  coach who was supposed to be some type of Qb whisperer who could practically work miracles with Qbs  & then he does not start the Qb 1  in the first preseason game which is like a WTF moment that makes no real good logical sense ?

& then instead turns around & starts his Qb3 who went out there last night &  had one of if not the worse performances of any Qb so far in the preseason 

yeah it's still early but still...just saying

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, bandu said:

& what do all those teams at the bottom of the list or let-s say ranking  have in common well they all have elite franchise Qbs 

Carolina on the other hand just think they have a franchise Qb & with the right players & coach will perform at an elite level 

It’s irrelevant. They are playing Bryce this year unless he gets hurt. I’m saying QB3 is a random position to rank as it rarely gets used. 

Also the Ravens and Bengals have dealt with QB injuries yet they still have some random QB3. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...