Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bryce bashing needs to stop


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

30 minutes ago, PootieNunu said:

fug that, I would rather have a good QB.... 

I would like nothing more than for Bryce to show why we moved up to draft him, I just think it's a long shot after seeing him last season. 

I feel the same way. While I don't have high hopes, he gets a shot this season.  If it doesn't work out, we try again next year with a qb in the draft.  

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, PootieNunu said:

fug that, I would rather have a good QB.... 

I would like nothing more than for Bryce to show why we moved up to draft him, I just think it's a long shot after seeing him last season. 

Where did you read that as anyone not wanting a good QB? The wait and see people typically won’t want him if he continues to struggle. Last year was just tough to grade anyone on offense. If he stinks it up he will lead us to the pick to replace him. This year should be better because we actually have a first to fall back on if we completely suck again. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry but that’s nonsense

When vets are sucking it up, nobody says to stop bashing them.  With how early into careers players become impact players these days, any rookie should be open to fair criticism

when you were the #1 pick after giving up what we did to get the pick, then it’s even more fair game.

No, none of that is Bryce’s fault, but it’s what comes along with the trade and draft pick, you make 10’s of millions, you’re not immune to fair criticism because you’re young.

Sure, criticize the front office for making such a stupid trade and pick, even more so than you criticize Bryce.

But he’s the #1 pick of the draft who looks like a high school player out there with a noodle for an arm.  He sold himself on his super brain and even with that, the game looked entirely too fast for him the entirety of the season.

He earned this criticism with his play, he needs to earn it going away on the field, or well… try to, because I sincerely don’t believe he can

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
On 8/14/2024 at 10:13 PM, methodtoll said:

I have said since the beginning of last year to be patient with Bryce Young and I still hold to it. I am at least giving him this season, and maybe next depending on what improvement he has made. I think my main argument is that we can't keep changing QBs every time they don't play to your expectations initially... We got to give him time to let it play out and his rookie season is not enough to justify moving on. 

That said, if he fails to improve after this season, then I will talk about Beck, Ewers, or Sanders but until then... It's Bryce's time right now. 

(P.S. I am a Georgia fan so definitely would love to have Beck on our team but that is a discussion for another day)

You still wanna give him the entire season if he continues to poo the bed?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Johnstonny said:

Hate it for the kid...how could so many pundits be so wrong. Hes toast.

Pundits... are bullshitters and follow narratives like lemmings. No penalty to them if they miss, like weather forecasters. 

Edited by strato
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Xtreme said:

The only benefit to keep playing him is to boost his value. It won't be much but it could decent enough to trade him for a 6th MAYBE a 5th. 

He ain't worth a 5th or 6th round pick, or even a 7th round pick. Roster spots are limited, so why waste it on him when they can easily pick up an UDFA who can outplay him?

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...