Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bryce bashing needs to stop


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, strato said:

We can waive his ass and someone could claim him, technically. Which is the only way I'd take a look at him. 

But, I've had a good enough look.

Nah, can't cut him - he'd have a ~$22m dead cap hit and would cost us $12m in cap space. You just have to make him a back up and let the contract play out and decline the 5th year option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand any of the surprise. In Bryce, himself being surprised, I guess I could understand. He is buddies with all these other QBs and considered himself one of them I guess. Maybe thought he was better, in his inner thoughts.

He is really not one of them and it was going to come out if he pushed it. And he did. Had an agent, did all the big time maneuvers to get drafted high, I hope he tipped his agent. But it is out now. Be fuging careful what you ask for. 

If he would have asked to be a late 1st mid 2nd and God forbid, a 3rd round pick, he would have avoided all that pressure. Nope. 

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, UNCrules2187 said:

Nah, can't cut him - he'd have a ~$22m dead cap hit and would cost us $12m in cap space. You just have to make him a back up and let the contract play out and decline the 5th year option.

Sure, agreed. It sort of a statement just to illustrate where things were. Technically I guess. 

I have been on the 'he is the number 2 because you can't really cut him' and still have to pay a backup too for the new guy. Bryce is guaranteed, you are giving him his money no matter what. No brainer. 

He is actually the perfect backup to a young player because no one is going to be clamoring for him to start over the rookie no matter how bad he looks.

I just posted and then saw this... so I may have made my quota lol. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Xtreme said:

The only benefit to keep playing him is to boost his value. It won't be much but it could decent enough to trade him for a 6th MAYBE a 5th. 

The best part is we're not even done paying for him yet.  We still owe the Bears next year's second round pick, which will likely be the first pick in the 2nd round.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, NAS said:

I will be honest I don’t think I can sit through a season worth of this crap.

The 2023-2024 (aka Bryce Young) Panther are the worst offensive team I've seen in the past 10 years. They are really a hard team to watch. No paying fan should have to watch this sorry display of football for back to back seasons. The one game Dalton played wasn't great, but it was much more exciting than all of Young's performances, with the possible exception of the GB game. I don't see how the offense or defense can get mentally ready to play week in and week out knowing the have no chance to win because the offense is going to struggle to get to 14 points per game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, NAS said:

I will be honest I don’t think I can sit through a season worth of this crap. At the same time, best decision is to let him play out the season and then move on.  Chances are he will probably get hurt at some point anyway.

It’s amazing that it took 1 week of play for Young to lose the support of posters wanting to give him a chance this year. I agree that I’d let him play out the year. Dalton isn’t the answer and honestly his winning % is poo since 2015. We just need to get to our new QB in ASAP.

I guess the only problem is the development of Leggette and Sanders. Mingo’s route running looked so bad on Sullivan’s video of Young that I’m not worried about him and Johnson is a vet so we kind of already know him.

It’s a balancing act of getting the top pick and advancing the young guys. I’m leaning towards the pick because we’ve already passed up Stroud, AR, Williams, Daniels and Maye. The last thing we need is the top QB in 2025 to go one pick before us.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Xtreme said:

The only benefit to keep playing him is to boost his value. It won't be much but it could decent enough to trade him for a 6th MAYBE a 5th. 

Not the only benefit. The season is still young (no pun intended). If he plays himself out of the mess extending from last season, and actually begins to look like a starter, then great. If he continues to suck, then we should be willing to take the hit so that he can play us into a draft position that will bring forth his replacement (much like Pickles did when his play afforded us Cam).

Edited by TD alt
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Needs a West coast, precision offense, imo.  Could be a great one. I started to respond to this thread, but my brain took me off on a tangent, and it necessitated a new thread--just a different logic, if it can be called that.
    • MHS getting ready to drop some major radical thinking on you all.  You might need some goggles.  Long read, but it should stimulate some brain cells.  Your ideas (your ideas, I dont care what you think about mine!) encouraged.   All college QBs are developmental players.  With the transfer portal etc. players are hopping from program to program, often getting paid more than they would if drafted as juniors. I do not know if that is the reason and I only hypothesize about the fix, but it seems to me, this year there is a ton of developmental talent-risers, fallers, etc.  To prove my point, let's gander (yes, I used the word gander here without help from AI) at the early first round (top 10) draft picks over the last 10 years.  This should convince you to stop shopping at Oscar de la Renta and start checking out WalMart (if you can avoid being caught staring at a 250 lb woman wearing tights, a cut off wife-beater with a skull and crossbone naval ring) you can find some real bargains.   Blake Bortles (3) 2014 Jameis Winston (1) 2015 Marcus Mariota (2) 2015 Jared Goff (1) 2016* Carson Wentz (2) 2016 Mitch Trubisky (2) 2017 Pat Mahomes (10) 2017 Josh Rosen (10) 2018 Josh Allen (7) 2018 Sam Darnold (3) 2018* Baker Mayfield (1) 2018* Daniel Jones (6) 2019* Kyler Murray (1) 2019 Joe Burrow (1) 2020 Tua Tagovailoa (5) 2020 Justin Herbert (6) 2020   Trevor Lawrence (1) 2021 Zach Wilson (2) 2021 Trey Lance (3) 2021 Bryce Young (1) 2023 CJ Stroud (2) 2023  (borderline, but not a star yet) Anthony Richardson (4) 2023   (*not counting the late bloomers who are now playing well, but too late to benefit the team that drafted him, arguably) In the past 10 years (2014-23--too early to tell on the rest), 7 QBs were drafted first overall, and only 1 has lived up to it with the team that drafted him, Joe Burrow.  And if you recall, Burrow transferred to LSU because Ohio State he was (on the depth chart) behind household names like:  JT Barrett, Dwayne Haskins, and even Cardale Jones. Aside from that, in 10 years only 1 QB in 7 has panned out as the first overall draft pick.  That is less than a 14% chance of the player being successful in your uniform.  However, Other top 10 first-rounders such as Baker Mayfield, Sam Darnold, Jared Goff, Daniel Jones, have experienced some success after becoming traded, cut, or even being Journeymen for a while.   In all, only 4 of the 22 (18%) of the QBs taken in the top 10 in the draft (between 2014-2023) are what I would consider a "franchise QB."  The others HURT their team in terms of salary and time.  The franchise will spend (in most cases) 2-3 years trying to develop a player who should make an immediate impact, based on draft status. If you consider that there are also 4 players on this list who are experiencing success on other teams, you might say that if you pick one of the 8 of 22 (36% chance if you don't count Trevor Lawrence or CJ Stroud--10 of 22-45%- if you do) who will experience first-round pick level success in the NFL at some point in their careers, you can conclude that your odds of drafting a starting-caliber NFL QB in round one is less than 50%, and of that group, the odds are just as likely they will become your franchise QB as they will the franchise QB for another team. In essence, you either hit the jackpot (18% chance of doing so) or you draft a bust (55% chance) or you (even worse) draft a player and become the farm system for another team that will benefit from the development.  MHS's Better way A better way to find your franchise QB is to do the following: 1.  Draft a QB when you don't really need one at the moment (desperation).  Green Bay knows this--Farve was on top of his game when they took Rogers, Rogers was on top of his game when they took Love.   2. 53% of the current NFL QBs were NOT drafted in the top 10.  12.5% of the STARTING QBs were not drafted in the first round--that percentage is nearly as high as the success rate (18%) for top 10 QBs.  We are talking about the most important position in sports.  If your QB is not shining, do not put all your eggs into one basket and waste 3 years trying to develop him.  Personally, I think you draft one (with solid measurables) when that player is on your board--even if you don't think you need a starting qb.   3.  Trade back a bit in the first round and get your QB, adding a second or third rounder, to be used on a WR or OL.  The odds are greater that the QB will succeed if he has weapons and protection.  Sounds crazy, but GMs drafting a QB in round one are acting in desperation.  (Anthony Richardson 4th pick overall?  Really?)  About this draft (2026) Personally, I think the top of this draft is "Red Flag City," a term I am getting a copyright for because it is awesome.  However, we need to develop a QB to complete only when he is ready; let him play behind the starter for a year or two.  Instead, we have some 40 year old Ginger milking the salary cap until his grandchildren are grown.  Bring in competition.  Look for players with solid mechanics, not stats.  Any qb should succeed at Ohio State.  WR heaven, OL get drafted, solid TE history.  Instead, look at feet, his ability to read the defense (percentage of plays where he throws to the best option--completion percentage is secondary), release time, leadership qualities (only Alphas need apply), his size, etc.   In today's NFL, however, the ability to make the best read an release the ball quickly are essential to success.   I might even de-emphasize running ability and athleticism if the reading and release times are not elite.  Why?  Running QBs tend to hide those deficiencies and they run instead of waiting that extra .3 seconds.  Slow reading means the QB is not anticipating the WR getting open. It means their feet switch to run mode subconsciously even before they go through the progressions.  There are a few, such as Lamar Jackson, who have developed their processing speeds and release, but it took time.  In my view, good WRs, TEs, and OL are essential for any QB, and no young QB should be expected to succeed if the GM has not. The 2026 NFL Draft At this point, I am amazed how much the bigger names entering the season have fallen and how the unknowns from 2024 have staked their claims.   I see top 10 picks as follows (not that they are worthy, but desperate times and desperate men do desperate things during times of desperation): 1. Ty Simpson, Alabama:  The most NFL-ready QB, in my opinion.  Watch him read the defense. 2. Fernando Mendoza, Indiana:  In the right system (West Coast) he could prosper.  If the right team is available, he will be the second QB taken. 3. LeNorris Sellers, THE University of South Carolina:  I am higher on Sellers than some because he has the skill set to be great.  SC may not have been the place to showcase his talent.  By draft night, I think he rises into the top 10, around 7th overall 4.  Dante Moore, Oregon:  Some will have him at #1 or #2, but he has some issues and I am not fond of drafting QBs from the West coast conferences. After this run on QBs, there might be crickets for a while.  If the Panthers are picking #12 or so (as I predict), they should trade back and get a developmental QB. But look at these names that have fallen--is anything worth developing there? Garrett Nussmeier, LSU Cade Klubnik, Clemson Sam Leavitt, Arizona State John Mateer, Oklahoma Drew Allar, Penn State Carson Beck, Miami Taylor Green, Arkansas However, if I am the Panthers GM, I think I would draft the best LB in round 1 (as of Nov 16) and take one of the fallen players who meet the criteria mentioned earlier.  I do not do so with the intention of starting the player, but developing the player.  If you see potential, you build your offensive philosophy, your offense, and your playbook for the future around that skill set.   The player I would like to see us research extensively (based on what I know about him)?  Brendon Soresby, Cincinnati.  Stay tuned.            
    • Remember when people wanted us to trade for Deebo?
×
×
  • Create New...