Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What is the benefit to benching starters for the preseason?


hepcat
 Share

Recommended Posts

IMO not playing BY and other starters is risk mitigation.  It is a roster that is void of solid talent so in their minds, risk of a starter's injury in the preseason is greater than the benefit of playing them.  I don't like it as I wanted something in the preseason but can see the rationale. 

So I guess instead of me complaining about the performance of the starters in preseason or the coaches playing starters where they get hurt in meaningless games, I have to settle for complaining about the starters not playing. 

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2023 Preseason: 0-3 (finished 2-15)

2022 Preseason: 2-1 (finished 7-10)

2021 Preseason: 1-2 (finished 5-12)

2020 Preseason: No Preseason (finished 5-11)

2019 Preseason: 2-2 (finished 5-11)

2018 Preseason: 3-1 (finished 7-9)

2017 Preseason: 2-2 (finished 11-5)

2016 Preseason: 2-2 (finished 6-10)

2015 Preseason: 3-1 (finished 15-1)

2014 Preseason: 2-2 (finished 7-8-1)

2013 Preseason: 3-1 (finished 12-4)

2012 Preseason: 2-2 (finished 7-9)

2011 Preseason: 1-3 (finished 6-10)

2010 Preseason: 1-3 (finished 2-14)

2009 Preseason: 0-4 (finished 8-8)

2008 Preseason: 2-2 (finished 12-4)

2007 Preseason: 1-3 (finished 7-9)

2006 Preseason: 4-0 (finished 8-8)

2005 Preseason: 2-2 (finished 11-5)

2004 Preseason: 4-0 (finished 7-9)

2003 Preseason: 4-0 (finished 11-5)

2002 Preseason: 1-3 (finished 7-9)

2001 Preseason: 2-2 (finished 1-15)

2000 Preseason: 0-4 (finished 7-9)

1999 Preseason: 2-2 (finished 8-8)

1998 Preseason: 2-2 (finished 4-12)

1997 Preseason: 0-4 (finished 7-9)

1996 Preseason: 2-2 (finished 12-4)

1995 Preseason: 3-2 (finished 7-9)

 

Winning Preseason and Winning Season: 37.5%

Losing Preseason and Losing Season: 88.9%

.500 Preseason and Winning Season: 36.4%

.500 Preseason and Losing Season: 54.5%

 

 

 

FWIW, this was the data I gathered.

 

*Posted this in another thread but probably better suited for this discussion.

 

There is some data for you guys to digest/bicker over.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

2023 Preseason: 0-3 (finished 2-15)

2022 Preseason: 2-1 (finished 7-10)

2021 Preseason: 1-2 (finished 5-12)

2020 Preseason: No Preseason (finished 5-11)

2019 Preseason: 2-2 (finished 5-11)

2018 Preseason: 3-1 (finished 7-9)

2017 Preseason: 2-2 (finished 11-5)

2016 Preseason: 2-2 (finished 6-10)

2015 Preseason: 3-1 (finished 15-1)

2014 Preseason: 2-2 (finished 7-8-1)

2013 Preseason: 3-1 (finished 12-4)

2012 Preseason: 2-2 (finished 7-9)

2011 Preseason: 1-3 (finished 6-10)

2010 Preseason: 1-3 (finished 2-14)

2009 Preseason: 0-4 (finished 8-8)

2008 Preseason: 2-2 (finished 12-4)

2007 Preseason: 1-3 (finished 7-9)

2006 Preseason: 4-0 (finished 8-8)

2005 Preseason: 2-2 (finished 11-5)

2004 Preseason: 4-0 (finished 7-9)

2003 Preseason: 4-0 (finished 11-5)

2002 Preseason: 1-3 (finished 7-9)

2001 Preseason: 2-2 (finished 1-15)

2000 Preseason: 0-4 (finished 7-9)

1999 Preseason: 2-2 (finished 8-8)

1998 Preseason: 2-2 (finished 4-12)

1997 Preseason: 0-4 (finished 7-9)

1996 Preseason: 2-2 (finished 12-4)

1995 Preseason: 3-2 (finished 7-9)

 

Winning Preseason and Winning Season: 37.5%

Losing Preseason and Losing Season: 88.9%

.500 Preseason and Winning Season: 36.4%

.500 Preseason and Losing Season: 54.5%

 

 

 

FWIW, this was the data I gathered.

 

*Posted this in another thread but probably better suited for this discussion.

 

There is some data for you guys to digest/bicker over.

I could be wrong but I don’t think the upset fans are mad about the losses/wins. They just want to see the starters get reps and look comfortable. It’s why I understand both sides, I just don’t think it’s as big of a deal as people are making it. Thanks for the data though!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ForJimmy said:

I could be wrong but I don’t think the upset fans are mad about the losses/wins. They just want to see the starters get reps and look comfortable. It’s why I understand both sides, I just don’t think it’s as big of a deal as people are making it. Thanks for the data though!

I don't really think there is any danger of our starters looking comfortable, so that seems like an unfounded worry.

  • Beer 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, WhoKnows said:

I don’t see an issue with guys who are proven vets. Josh Allen was supposed to start and play but it was raining so they kept him on the bench.

Do you want to know who has played in the preseason? Williams, Penix, Richardson, Stroud, Maye, Levis, Daniels, Nix and McCarthy. Basically every 1st round QB from last year and this year plus Levis has played in at least one of the preseason games. We have the only 1st round plus top of 2nd QB in the past two years that hasn’t played a down in the preseason.

image.gif.6432460000300a213fc5b07a9aed399d.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Right.  It's a working progress regardless.  I'm sure people will blame preseason, but it's really irrelevant. 

100% agree. If the "preseason" or camp was at fault then we would suck early and then get better late. If we maintain the same level of suckitude the entire year, that's a pretty safe bet that it was coming no matter what.

People are just putting the cart before the horse here. We have 17 games to watch this nonsense and bitch. Everyone needs to chill out for a couple more weeks. 

But, you know.....maybe this is the Huddle in preseason form too? This could be Huddlers getting their reps in for the regular season. You know what, I have reversed course. This is good practice. Bitch away.

 

  • Flames 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Schlereth calling us back to back....somebody call up Morgan!  Schlereth got that dawg in him!
    • I was just thinking — if Bryce had been the #1 overall pick without the massive trade-up, there wouldn’t be nearly this much anger and resentment toward him. The problem isn’t Bryce himself; it’s what Scott Fitterer gave up to get him and how the front office completely mismanaged the assets that followed. The picks from the Christian McCaffrey trade — one of our few major opportunities to rebuild with young talent — were essentially wasted. The second-rounder was used on Jonathan Mingo,  The third and fourth-round picks were packaged to move up for DJ Johnson, a 25-year-old rookie  who looked like a miss from day 1.  That’s brutal roster management. And when you add in other misses like Trevon Wallace and Xavier Legette—guys who were supposed to be athletic difference-makers but haven’t moved the needle—it just compounds the issue. Combine that with a string of awful free-agent signings (Hurst, Chark, Bozeman regressing, etc.), and it’s no wonder the offense looks like a mess. And this goes beyond Fitterer — it’s a scouting department problem too. For years, the Panthers’ evaluations have been inconsistent and reactive. They’ve chased traits and combine numbers over production and football IQ. The same front office that identified DJ Johnson as a third-round target somehow passed on multiple plug-and-play starters at positions of need. When your scouting process keeps missing on mid-round talent — the backbone of good teams — no quarterback can save you. The lack of depth and development across this roster is the real indictment. None of these failures are Bryce’s fault directly. But when the entire team looks lifeless, the narrative circles back to him. He was supposed to be the “force multiplier,” the “point guard” who elevates everyone else. Problem is, there’s not much “force” around him to multiply, and that style of quarterback play only works when the infrastructure is solid — coaching, protection, and playmakers. Look at the 49ers for comparison. If San Francisco didn’t have elite coaching, culture, and roster talent, that Trey Lance trade would be seen as one of the biggest front-office blunders ever. The difference is they had the organization to survive it. At least Bryce is serviceable — Lance isn’t even on their roster anymore. Put Bryce in the 49ers’ system and he’s probably putting up Brock Purdy-like numbers. The bottom line is this: the dysfunction in Carolina didn’t start with Bryce Young, and it sure hasn’t ended with him. This is a franchise problem — years of poor drafting, weak scouting, short-sighted trades, and constant turnover. The common denominator through all of it? David Tepper. Until the culture, patience, and football operations at the top change, it won’t matter who the quarterback is.  
    • I really like Carson Beck’s talent level.  Needs to make better decisions sometimes but I think he could be really good.  Looks like Miami is for real.  Pitt might be interesting at the end of the year but they almost certainly win out 
×
×
  • Create New...