Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jaycee Horn’s future with the Panthers


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, MHS831 said:

We often make our personnel decisions from the heart based on appearances and "common sense."  However, I have learned that what you think you know through observation is not always reliable knowledge.  By converting performance-based measurement to statistics and then to visual graphs, you can better understand the big picture, probability and likely outcomes.  This is what we do in Education research every day.

CMC and RBs peak early, so even though the Niners are getting a ton out of CMC, his age is now becoming significant.  I will use fantasy stats / article to demonstrate the point--why trading him and that contract may have been the best decision for the Panthers in the long term--time will tell.  CMC is 28--the year before most RBs significantly drop off.  Just a different perspective, but this is why I have always said, "never give a RB a second contract."  Yes, there are exceptions, but if you base decisions on exceptions or isolated comparisons, you are being stupid--in the research world.

image.png.fa5149f2f94e1bd8ca08e3db2efca52c.png

https://apexfantasyleagues.com/peak-age-nfl-running-back/#:~:text=The oldest players to accomplish the feat were,place at age 29 – a noticeable drop-off.

While this generally holds true it should be noted that the amount of touches also plays into this strongly..... and cmc basicly had 2 seasons off.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Dave Gettleman's Shorts said:

CMC's injuries were often the result of poor management by the staff resulting in him being over worked. (20 HB dives per game, playing 99% of snaps)

I'm pretty sure SF uses him just as much, he had second most carries in his career last year (272), second only to the 2019 season with Carolina when he had 287.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

My general thought is let him play out his entire deal and then see what happens. I get that we run the risk of him staying healthy, balling out and then we have to pay top money. But, I am okay paying a top player top money. I am not okay getting caught in a mid-level deal for multiple seasons for a guy that has so trade value and can't stay healthy.

I'm good with this

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A week ago, someone linked a twitter article that said we were going to trade him.  Now we are going to pay him top dollar according to a twitter account.  Next week, someone on twitter will say we are going to convert him to kicker.  

If he plays a full season, and plays well, we will likely pick up the fifth year.  If he gets injured and misses much of the season, we will likely move on from him.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PantherChris said:

While this generally holds true it should be noted that the amount of touches also plays into this strongly..... and cmc basicly had 2 seasons off.

I had the same thought. And he is a pass catcher, which reduces his hits--they are unlikely to leave him in the backfield to block on pass plays--

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’d be hesitant to trade him. Really don’t want to trade him. Let him play out these two years, and if he balls out and stays healthy, pay him top money. We’re likely about to reset the QB clock here soon, so the team will be able to maneuver around his contract, if it comes to that. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MHS831 said:

I had the same thought. And he is a pass catcher, which reduces his hits--they are unlikely to leave him in the backfield to block on pass plays--

Some people only look at this through Panthers colors lenses.

Break down the career touches.

First look at Stanford. He averaged roughly 39 touches a game in college.

https://www.stack.com/a/how-christian-mccaffrey-built-his-body-to-withstand-one-of-the-biggest-workloads-in-college-football/

In the NFL he is 5th in career touches with 1,806. 668 of those touches are from the last two seasons in San Francisco alone.

https://www.statmuse.com/nfl/ask/active-nfl-running-back-most-career-touches

At 28 years old with a fresh new large contract and on a team eyeing at least one or two more championship runs with their core mostly intact his touches are not going down. If anything they could very well go up.

He's putting the history of the position to the test that's for sure.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, frankw said:

Some people only look at this through Panthers colors lenses.

Break down the career touches.

First look at Stanford. He averaged roughly 39 touches a game in college.

https://www.stack.com/a/how-christian-mccaffrey-built-his-body-to-withstand-one-of-the-biggest-workloads-in-college-football/

In the NFL he is 5th in career touches with 1,806. 668 of those touches are from the last two seasons in San Francisco alone.

https://www.statmuse.com/nfl/ask/active-nfl-running-back-most-career-touches

At 28 years old with a fresh new large contract and on a team eyeing at least one or two more championship runs with their core mostly intact his touches are not going down. If anything they could very well go up.

He's putting the history of the position to the test that's for sure.

Good stuff Frank

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, frankw said:

Some people only look at this through Panthers colors lenses.

Break down the career touches.

First look at Stanford. He averaged roughly 39 touches a game in college.

https://www.stack.com/a/how-christian-mccaffrey-built-his-body-to-withstand-one-of-the-biggest-workloads-in-college-football/

In the NFL he is 5th in career touches with 1,806. 668 of those touches are from the last two seasons in San Francisco alone.

https://www.statmuse.com/nfl/ask/active-nfl-running-back-most-career-touches

At 28 years old with a fresh new large contract and on a team eyeing at least one or two more championship runs with their core mostly intact his touches are not going down. If anything they could very well go up.

He's putting the history of the position to the test that's for sure.

We should have arguably gotten more for him, but by the time we're good again he'll be washed.  Best case he'll be a 3rd down back specialist sorta guy by then.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...