Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How surpised were you at how the team looked(Game 1 Edition)?


kungfoodude
 Share

How surprised were you at how the team looked(Game 1 Edition)?  

74 members have voted

  1. 1. 0 = Not Surprised at all, 5 = Absolutely shocked



Recommended Posts

Another poster mentioned lackadaisical; that about sums it up.  The overall lack of effort or enthusiasm was breath taking.  

There was improvement in the Oline but, not much else to write home about.  It will be a long season so, we’ll get to see who wants to play and who wants to just cash a check.

Didn’t someone in the front office mention ‘dawg’?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Ricky Prickles said:

I was very surprised. I guess I'm just an idiot but I actually believed with some protection and an off-season of preparation that Bryce may be able to achieve average QB in the league. I didn't expect the world and all I had hoped for was just an average starter with lots of help around him. Needles to say I was shocked and down and now feel like an idiot 

You're not alone.  It was obvious we didn't have a playoff roster but I thought we'd hang around and lose by 10 or so.  Still win 5 or 6 games. So yes, complete humiliation and a lost season after 1 game surprised me.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Loyalty4Life said:

I thought we would lean on the run a lot more and slowly add Bryce with some PA throws.  Looks like a team that has not bought in.

I don't think Bryce is completely broken yet but whatever newfound confidence he'd started to build went down the drain with that first pick. 

I expect them to look a little better next week but won't "figure it out" until Jonathon Brooks becomes the starter in 5 or 6 games.  We'll have won maybe 1 game by them and realize our only option is to pound the rock.  We will start doing that.  Brooks will break out as a star.  Bryce will improve little by little and start to look like his college tape or he actually is a complete bust and around week 10 Canales realizes we have a stud oline and RB and he'll bench Bryce.  We'll stupidly then win just enough games to kill a high enough draft pick to replace Bryce.

Face it Bryce is not (and will never be), an NFL caliber QB. Not even a quality backup. I said it last season and it has proven to be true. Dude just doesn't have the skillset or leadership qualities to make it.

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wanna see some examples made even if they don't really matter.  Boone allowing the punt block.  I'm way past a developmental 4th string RB.  Just get me someone who can do one simple job well. 

Sanders also screwed up a block that got Bryce sacked but Bryce seems unable to change up protection against obvious pressure.  Can't see it before it comes and doesn't have a plan if the pressure does come.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Jmac said:

Face it Bryce is not (and will never be), an NFL caliber QB. Not even a quality backup. I said it last season and it has proven to be true. Dude just doesn't have the skillset or leadership qualities to make it.

Maybe, but the best course of action is still for the staff to be behind Bryce 100 percent.  Him turning it around is still the most probable positive outcome possible for the QB position and the team as a whole. 

The only other option is start Dalton but I think that is too short a leash for Bryce.  As horrible as it sounds you have to stay the course and double down on Bryce and Canales as there really is no where else to go.  Pulling the plug after one game is the only way this gets worse.

Coaching looked better on offense.
Oline and WR looked better.
Bryce looked worse. 
Defense looked worse.  Boggles my mind to think we're worse against the run than last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was pretty much on record going in that Bryce was awful, he didn't fit with Canales and Canales didn't have this team ready given so much newness (and wasted the preseason opportunity). 

All that side, I was STILL a little surprised at exactly how pathetic the team was.  I have to lower my 3-5 wins pending how the ball bounces to 1-3. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I picked 5...  I just expected more.  I didn't think we'd win but most times division opponents play each other hard.  It was disheartening to see so many looking "checked out". 

I expected DC to have them more motivated to compete.  I expected Evero to do more with less as he's shown in the past.

I expected BY to have shown signs of improvement.

I expected too much I guess.  I bow expect to Aride with this team to hopefully improve.  Or lead us to another high Draft Pick.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Loyalty4Life said:

 

Sanders also screwed up a block that got Bryce sacked but Bryce seems unable to change up protection against obvious pressure.  Can't see it before it comes and doesn't have a plan if the pressure does come.

The one trait he supposedly excelled at was the "elite processing " ability. In reality, he has no feel or instincts at all.  He can't diagnose a blitz and get the ball out in time. If he actually sees someone open, that's when the panic starts and it's overthrown 5+ yards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Cold Cat said:

I picked 5...  I just expected more.  I didn't think we'd win but most times division opponents play each other hard.  It was disheartening to see so many looking "checked out". 

I expected DC to have them more motivated to compete.  I expected Evero to do more with less as he's shown in the past.

I expected BY to have shown signs of improvement.

I expected too much I guess.  I bow expect to Aride with this team to hopefully improve.  Or lead us to another high Draft Pick.  

Honestly, I think the amount of "less" we have given Evero is problematic. It was clear that unit got a lot worse in the offseason. Sunday it was clear on the field too.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In before: "XL sucks, there is no hope." "As long as we have Bryce, none of this matters." My response: "It's X, not XL...we're not discussing apparel sizes, or we'd have to consider XS."  
    • Alain Pierre provides some food for thought on Last Word On Sports regarding Xavier Legette, and his article, though specifically on X, kind of puts me in the mind of QBs being overdrafted and put into situations that they're not prepared for, some ultimately failing due to drafting missteps by front offices who don't necessarily view prospective players within the contextual importance that situations demand.  At this point, Legette looks like a failure in reference to expectations, of not only what a consistently productive NFL receiver looks like, but a first round pick (which he obviously should never have been). But the story on X isn't necessarily completely over. Damn. I seem to be experiencing deja vu...It wasn't X's fault that he was overdrafted, that was a choice by an FO that obviously downplayed actual realized skill vs outstanding measurables and upside. Sure, the FO was impressed by X's one-year feats during his senior season at South Carolina, but it was the NFL god, RAS (a.k.a. Raw Athletic Score), that had Dave Canales's and Dan Morgan's jaws dropping in amazement at the sight of X running around in underwear at the Combine...   "At 6-foot-3 and over 220 pounds, Legette brought rare athletic upside to the position. His breakout season at South Carolina showed flashes of dominance that NFL teams dream of. Projecting forward, many scouts compared his physical profile to D.K. Metcalf, and the Panthers clearly believed they could develop him into a true wide receiver 1 over time. The issue was never his talent. The issue was the timeline. Just a few picks later, the Chargers selected Ladd McConkey, a receiver who may have lacked Xavier Legette’s physical ceiling but entered the league far more technically refined. McConkey immediately showed advanced route discipline, leverage awareness, good pacing, and separation ability.  Bryce Young’s game has always depended on timing and anticipation. His best football at Alabama came with receivers capable of winning through precision rather than pure athleticism. Jameson Williams and John Metchie III were excellent route runners and were able to get drafted in 2022. McConkey naturally fit that style of play. Legette, meanwhile, needed significant development in the exact areas where Bryce Young needed help. The Panthers drafted traits when Bryce Young needed reliability."   Yes, the FO was guilty. The good thing is that the execs appear to be improving. Some of that may be attributed to the hiring of Eric Eager (who was hired right after the Xavier Legette draft). Eager seems to have helped the Panthers FO fine-tune their analytical progress, and, at least on paper, they acquired players with a lot of value during the last draft in regards to actually (what I'll refer to as) "underdrafting" talent relative to their position with value already built in.  Look at Chris Brazzell: He may be more of the quintessential project receiver who was arguably more or less just as raw as Legette was when he was drafted, and with a relatively high RAS as well. The notable difference is value, as Brazzell was a round three pick and Legette was a first rounder.    "Unlike the Xavier Legette situation, Carolina’s environment for Brazzell is completely different. "The Panthers are not asking a raw receiver prospect to stabilize this offense for Bryce Young. "Brazzell enters a much healthier developmental situation with far less pressure. With Tetairoa McMillan established as the primary target and Jalen Coker continuing to settle as the number 2 option...Xavier Legette, Metchie III, and Jimmy Horn Jr. are also still in this rotation, fighting for reps. "It gives Carolina something they failed to give Legette when they drafted him: A developmental runway. "Xavier Legette entered the league with expectations attached to a first-round pick and an offense desperate for answers. Brazzell enters a room where he can spend a year working on his route running, learning the playbook, and earning snaps gradually rather than being asked to become part of Bryce Young’s solution immediately. "And truthfully, Brazzell needs that time coming out of college. Despite his elite physical tools, many evaluators have several concerns about his overall polish as a receiver. "His route tree at Tennessee was viewed as fairly limited due to the type of offense that they run. The receivers are expected to run a lot of choice routes, which are dictated by the placement of the defenders. It doesn’t require technical route-running and an understanding of the playbook needed at the NFL level...   "Context changes significantly when expectations change. "The Panthers are not depending on Brazzell to save the offense. They can allow him to develop slowly, expand his route tree, improve his technical refinement, and learn behind a much more stable receiver room... "Traits become much easier to bet on when patience is built into the plan."   It's all about understanding your situation. I don't agree that it's an inherently difficult choice like the author is suggesting in the following excerpt. At the very least, I think that it should be easier as long as all parties involved stay levelheaded and true to their process.    "That is what makes these draft decisions so difficult. "Every front office believes it can find the next Metcalf, Owens, or Marshall. Sometimes they do. More often, they are betting on a development path that may take years to complete. "The challenge is understanding what your offense needs right now. "If a team has patience, stability, and a quarterback capable of carrying the offense while a receiver develops, betting on traits can make sense. But if a young quarterback needs immediate help, there is a strong argument for prioritizing the receiver who already knows how to separate, create throwing , and earn trust from day one. "That’s why the Xavier Legette-Ladd McConkey debate remains so fascinating. "It was never really a discussion about talent. It was a discussion about timing."   For me, Ladd McConkey was talented enough in his own right, that the gap--the upside--was never as big as people are suggesting between not only McConkey and Legette, but McConkey and other receivers drafted in the first round during that draft. The technique divide between Ladd and X was pretty stark though, as was the roughly 35 pounds, but the speed was identical, the maybe 1½ height difference isn't huge (6' and 6'1"), and it may surprise some that Ladd's RAS (9.34) was also enough to put him in the top 10 percent of receivers since 1987. There is an argument that he would've been a better pick for Bryce and the Panthers, regardless of timeline and talent. But, I still appreciate the thesis (if you will) of the article, as it still provides some hope--perhaps a glimmer at this point, that X's RAS may finally translate to the NFL given more time, but, perhaps more importantly, it explains how Dan Morgan and company are showing improvement, even if it appears somewhat understated. My hope is that continued improvement is palpable by this time next year. https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2026/05/30/xavier-legette-draft-lessons/#google_vignette        
    • Won’t stop until people stop buying overpriced poo.
×
×
  • Create New...