Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dave Canales announces next week's starting QB


TN05
 Share

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, WhoKnows said:

Let’s get real here guys. What kind of culture have we had the last few years? We aren’t losing any culture even if Young loses the team by continuing to play. I don’t think Dalton does anything. Dude’s record is 33-52-1 since 2015 on better teams.

This team is lost and it doesn’t really matter. What matters is what QB we get at the top of the 1st next draft. If we finally get the right one, the future culture will be fine.

It would take Young 297 games (17 seasons) to get to 33 wins.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here’s a really weird take that’s probably way off base but, if Dave is trying to drive morale down to the point where people are begging him to sell, is there anyone more well suited than Bryce? 

Weird take #2, does the o line eventually throw a full metal jacket style soap party on private Pyle? It’s obvious that poor play won’t get him pulled. 

Make no mistake, these guys want to win and with Bryce there is a 0.0% chance of that happening. There’s money on the line for these guys. Plummer/Dalton. We’re going nowhere with either, but at least some of the offense guys can show something. You think Hubbard is liking any of this? He’s about to get paid like a practice squad player if he doesn’t get some running room. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Rocky Davis said:

The thing that surprises me about Canales is the he isn't getting Young out of the pocket to be able to see downfield more or teaching Young to step up in a pocket provided by the O-line.

A lot falls on Young for not being a franchise QB.  He got thrown to the wolves last year and this year he gets blitzed and has PTSD from last year. 

Not saying he was ever a QB1, but he should be able to be a serviceable QB2 and I think he has had that knocked out of him.

If he gets out of the pocket there is a 90% chance he takes an unnecessary pick and a 10% chance he overthrows his target.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having Andy Dalton would have probably put this game within a score.

Defense was bad, but how many 3 and outs did they have to follow? Everyone plays half speed and uninspired when Bryce is in. 

If the fire is this hot after two weeks, wait until we play the Raiders out west next week. This is about to be circulating through national media and not just Person, Quick, and Fowler. 

Dalton will be starting in the next 2-3 weeks. If not, there will be Urban Meyer-Jaguars level media attention on the Panthers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Shotgun said:

I agree Dalton isn't the answer but he's absolutely better than Young. What will it hurt to put him in?

Dalton can at least make the offense function so other people can develop and be assessed. You can also have some level of entertaining football with him in. 

Hell, I wouldn't be opposed to Plummer. He looked like hammered poo in the pre-season but he actually has the physical skills for the job, maybe he can go from horrible to bad by the end of the season. We already know what Bryce is.

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Chaos said:

Give me one reason why the Panthers having the number one pick is a guaranteed sure thing.  I can definitely give you a reason it’s not. The midget wearing #9

It's not. There have been more failed #1 picks than successful ones. 

You can accumulate more talent by showing some promise in this place and getting some key FAs to want to sign here. Trust me, we will still have a Top 12 pick to find a QB. #1 pick doesn't mean anything though.

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ProcessBlue2 said:

Dalton can at least make the offense function so other people can develop and be assessed. You can also have some level of entertaining football with him in. 

Hell, I wouldn't be opposed to Plummer. He looked like hammered poo in the pre-season but he actually has the physical skills for the job, maybe he can go from horrible to bad by the end of the season. We already know what Bryce is.

Sanders, Mingo, Legette are experiencing QB hell right now. With Dalton they would at least have an opportunity to get several targets per game that travel more than 5 yards in the air. We have no way of knowing how good they can be with Young behind center. And as you pointed out, Plummer couldn’t look much worse than Young has the past 4 games. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...