Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Yes we will have #1 in 2025


PantherChris
 Share

Recommended Posts

The truth is, the offense is set up quite well for a young QB now. The O-line is playing well, despite Young's play. The receivers are getting open, wide open, and we have a good running back stable. Take the QB, and continue to build around him in 2025. 2026 is all about defense.

Edited by Jaxel
  • Pie 5
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LegioX said:

Has anyone ever ended up drafted a QB #1 and 3 years later drafting another QB at #1?

Boston Yanks in the 40s.

Rams are the closest with Bradford and Goff. Then they bailed on Goff after 5 years for an old vet to win a SB.

In the modern draft era 28 QBs have been taken #1 and 8 teams have taken multiple QBs at #1. Patriots 2 (Jim Plunkett 1971; Drew Bledsoe 1993) 22 yrs- Falcons 2 (Steve Bartkowski 1975; Michael Vick 2001) 26 yrs - Panthers 2 (Cam Newton 2011; Bryce Young 2023) 12 yrs - Browns 2 (Tim Couch 1999; Baker Mayfield 2018) 19 yrs- Bucs 2 (Vinny Testaverde 1987; Jameis Winston 2015) 28 yrs - Bengals 2 (Carson Palmer 2003; Joe Burrow 2020) 17 yrs - Rams 2 (Sam Bradford 2010; Jared Goff 2016) 6 yrs - Colts 4 (John Elway 1983; Jeff George 1990; Peyton Manning 1998; Andrew Luck 2012) 7, 8, 14 yrs.

Does not look like a list you want your team to join.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To get Bryce young, we traded DJ moore, CMC (for the draft capital), The 8th pick in 2023, first overall in 2024, and what will be the first pick of the second round (basically a first round pick).  Bryce is not only going to be the worst first overall pick in NFL history, but this will easily go down as the single worst trade in NFL history and I cant see a situation someone does something this stupid ever again.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nope Still missing it. Let's try this a different way... You have two quarterbacks from schools that ran the same kind of offense - maybe even two from the same school - on a given team (not necessarily the Panthers). One is designated the starter while the other is named the backup. Why?
    • yeah, pretty sure boss.....when things match and fit in the NFL.....the results then show it.  and when they don't, well, the results show that as well.  Bryce doesn't fit.   *but I get why late season and wants to argue with everyone Mr. Scot has also turned into a please don't talk to me about stats guy as well.  Given, the stats that reflect offensive productivity work against all your present arguments. 
    • Yeeeah...stats and rankings have zero to do with a discussion of scheme and skill set match. Maybe look up definitions of style vs ability and see if that helps. At this point, you've basically had three different people explain to you where you're wrong, but rather than addressing any of those statements, you're just resorting to straight deflection.  You don't get it. Either that or you're acting like you don't get it so that you can avoid the discussion because it's not going well for you. (that wouldn't surprise me either) 😄 Sme result either way, I suppose.
×
×
  • Create New...