Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Best and worst PFF grades from Panthers' Week 5 loss to Bears


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, CPF4LIFE said:

TE should be addressed like the guard position. If you can't draft somebody to fix it need to just pay a top tier FA to come here. Screw it. 

I would rather get middle of the pack OGs in free agency and trade for TEs that are underutilized in their current offense. Paying top money to free agents is a bad strategy IMO.

Edited by Waldo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Mage said:

Top tier TEs usually don't hit the market.  TE play league-wide isn't pretty.  Only 2 TEs have over 250 receiving yards this year and one of them, Dallas Goedert, was just on a bye week.  Behind them is Jake Ferguson at 229 yards, and he's also only played 4 games.

TE is just a hard position to hit on.

This. It's why the Greg Olsen trade was one of the best in franchise history.

Having said that, TE is also not a position you generally see players come right out of college and perform at a high level at. Even guys like Kelce, Kittle, Goedert, etc. took time to become impact players.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, AceBoogie said:

The thing about data is that it’s unbiased. He played well in garbage time in minimal stats. Why does that bother you so much? Hmm

But we've already seen this. That was the justification for giving him a free pass in the first half of his rookie season. Those losses that were over by the 4th quarter he put together a few decent drives when the opposing D was playing prevent. We obviously know how the rest of that storyline played out. It is completely understandable that anyone would be highly skeptical of more of that now.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, frankw said:

But we've already seen this. That was the justification for giving him a free pass in the first half of his rookie season. Those losses that were over by the 4th quarter he put together a few decent drives when the opposing D was playing prevent. We obviously know how the rest of that storyline played out. It is completely understandable that anyone would be highly skeptical of more of that now.

Everything that you said don’t change poo about what that isolated data is telling you. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/8/2024 at 8:14 AM, Waldo said:

I'm done expecting projects to be fine. When they are I will celebrate but we have seen a few not make it here. Like I said, I'm happy he is getting the reps he is getting.

I saw something in him during preseason, but that was preseason--I think he has the tools and I assume they will be fine until they prove they aren't.   I get your point, but right now, if we were Chief fans, we'd be saying that about players. Instead, we are waiting for the next bust and injury.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

I saw something in him during preseason, but that was preseason--I think he has the tools and I assume they will be fine until they prove they aren't.   I get your point, but right now, if we were Chief fans, we'd be saying that about players. Instead, we are waiting for the next bust and injury.

Pretty much. I think his hype got a little out of control but it's a position we have needed an upgrade at for a while now. Like you said a project in the 4th isn't bad like in the first and second.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/8/2024 at 7:58 AM, MHS831 said:

A 4th rounder in his 4th game.  He is going to be fine.

Just like Ian Thomas.

I can't scream from the mountain tops loud enough, bang my head against the wall long enough or grit my teeth hard enough any longer. 

FIX FUGG'N TE POSITION!!! And no, taking a dude who "dropped" to the 4th round in a sh*t TE class save the top guy, isn't going to do the trick. 

I'll even take a FA at this point. I wonder if the Raiders would swap Young for Mayer straight up?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Bryce Young has recorded 4 game-winning drives through nine weeks, leading the Carolina Panthers to crucial victories in tight contests. The 12-play, 58-yard clock-killer versus the Packers in Week 9 (16-13 upset). This pace positions him as the team's most clutch performer in years, with a 68.4% success rate on go-ahead drivesalready surpassing many franchise benchmarks early in his career.   Young's early 2025 surge (top-5 league-wide in clutch EPA at 0.28 per dropback) not only outstrips the debuts of Newton (2 in 2011) and Delhomme (1 in 2003) but hints at him climbing this list quickly if the Panthers sustain their wildcard hunt. Data underscores his growth: no other Panther QB hit 4 GWDs before Week 10 in a season.   The energy fans pour into the stadium directly shapes Bryce Young’s performance positive support has been shown to elevate his fourth-quarter efficiency by 12%, strengthening team cohesion and execution under pressure. Criticizing or booing the starting quarterback fractures morale, disrupts focus, and undermines the very resilience needed in clutch moments. When fans stand firmly behind their QB and team, they become a true home-field advantage, amplifying performance and accelerating the path to sustained success. Now are you a Carolina Panther fan or a Panther hater? 
    • Bryce would have extended some plays scrambling with his legs but then again he also has a high number of fumbles so you never know what you're going to get and the way the Bills were getting after Andy (sacked 7 times) it stands to reason Bryce would have been under duress often. What exactly do you want here? I mean I'm going to go by the gameplan I saw after Bryce turned the ball over against GB. Clearly Dave Canales was deliberately trying to limit the opportunities for him to make a catastrophic mistake. And didn't Micah Parsons log zero QB pressures? So with that in mind if you are asking for anyone to argue our offense with Bryce would have had much if any success against that opportunistic motivated Bills defense while we were also splitting carries between Rico and Chuba who had the majority of them which ended up being a situation resulting in a weeks worth of scathing criticism and deservedly so then I'm going to just have to say we can agree to disagree.
×
×
  • Create New...