Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

4-3


bigrod9
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, kungfoodude said:

Yeah, it doesn't matter the scheme you are running if you simply cannot get the right players. 

Its been two years now, tuttle trys his best, but hes barely 305 and theres limit to his absorbing blocks and being moved off his spot. 

Simply put they MUST find or trade for legit NT if they want to keep up this 3-4 program.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Basbear said:

Its been two years now, tuttle trys his best, but hes barely 305 and theres limit to his absorbing blocks and being moved off his spot. 

Simply put they MUST find or trade for legit NT if they want to keep up this 3-4 program.  

Yeah, elite 3-4 nose tackles are as hard to find as elite 4-3 DEs. But there’s only one instead of two, so I guess we got that going for us lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

He was playing DE in our odd alignments 

That’s probably his best fit too. DE in a 3-4 so I’d probably keep it for now. Horn (if he can be relatively healthy) and  Brown should be the defensive pieces moving forward looks like Wallace is flashing sone talent too.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, KaijuGato said:

4-2-5 with Stephen Belichick as DC. Doing good things at the University of Washington.

Legit, that may be the future with the way football is coached from HS through college. Try to get a 4-3 style front with solid MLB's then fill in with a mixture of speedy CB's and LB/safety style players.

 

I really can't take an offense to anything we do at this point.  We are ravaged by injury.  By far, the worst injury situation in the league.  We have lost a laundry list of starters, not just depth to injury.  The only other teams that are close are TB and SF.

Proof = https://www.espn.com/nfl/injuries

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Brown at DE. He doesn't get stuck as the big guy in the middle and takes those double teams out wide. For a 3-4 DE that should free up the passrush to do some fun things. This team has just stunk at their edge approach. Brown only had 2 sacks last year but the O has to account for him. They get one guy who could be decent in a tandem but they never have a decent 2nd option. Like WTF is going on at the other OLBer spot? They can't get backup quality play out of one of those guys in run game and any sign of life at all in the passing game? 

The NT spot could use an upgrade. The problem I have with that spot is all of those guys are under 310 and I thought they were supposed to be the biggest dlinement in a 3-4? That doesn't seem right to me IDK

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's go back to the immortal words of Mel Kiper Jr:  "They should ban the cover 2!"  Why?  It's limiting explosive passing plays.  It makes it harder for young QBs to play well because it forces everything in to condensed fields.  Agree, disagree, it doesn't matter.  The NFL won't do that (will it???).

So let's look at what real NFL defenses do?  They have a base D for the depth chart, but they have a variety of packages and looks: for short yardage, blitzing, prevent, intermediate, 2 deep, single high, man, etc...  What it comes down to in the modern NFL is you need guys who can occupy and get past the OL.  You need guys who can rush the passer from the outside in.  You need guys who can guard behind the DL until the DBs take over.  You need guys who can cover.  You need guys who can tackle.  You need good communication.

Right now, we have guys who get pushed around, guys who don't do a great job filling gaps, guys who can't get past OL, guys who don't communicate well, and guys who make bone headed decisions.  How do you scheme them into getting better at playing football?  

I think Evero is trying to do too much with these guys.  There are too many new pieces on a weekly basis.  They can't play fast because their heads are spinning.  Evero is a smart, serious dude.  I like him a lot.  But this is not working.  Time to go back to the basics, and let the players play fast.  Sure, we'll continue to get beat by better players and schemes, but we can look competent, make some stops, and give some hope...

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think the scheme is the issue. I think that the roster situation and health is the issue.  Pick something and stay with it.  One positive of the 3-4 is that 4-3 tweeners have potential in the odd front.

 

We are currently no more equipped to play 4-3 than 3-4

Edited by csx
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, BIGH2001 said:

The 3-4 works when you have a space eating DT, ie Derrick Brown. Now that he’s gone that scheme is a terrible fit for what’s left.

It's even better with a Haloti Ngata, Vince Wilfork type guy and OLBs like TJ Watt. Watt can hold the line of scrimmage and rush the passer like a 4-3 end which is what you need when they are sending the house off tackle. If a team goes true smash mouth with a pulling lineman, lead blocker, and tight end we have almost nothing to stop it. It is just easier to outfit a 4-3.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • First, apologies @MHS831, I know you began this about tackles, and it was good. But... Frank, your post is just another Bryce sucks post. You obviously believe, like your buddy, that if we draft a WR it's all about evaluating Bryce Young or coddling Bryce Young. In short, it would be about improving the damned team. If anything, if Bryce is as destined to fail (or is already a failure right now... irredeemable), then another playmaker at WR would just seal the envelope and send him on his way. In my world, that's a good thing.  If some of you think that Bryce is a lame duck, then why wouldn't you want to set the offense up for the next QB to come in and be dropped into the offense to have success? Or, maybe you think it's all a moot point anyway because Tepper sucks, Dan Morgan sucks, Canales sucks, Ejiro sucks, Brandt Tilis sucks---everybidy sucks! If that's the case, then why does anyone care who or what we draft? Obviously some of you have all the answers and can run a gotdamn franchise better than the FO does now.
    • Yeah man, idk. I’m not super big on looking at the position group overall and damning the group. I’ll do the same with less words for WR. I think Proctor is the ultimate fit because he could be your future left or right tackle or left or right guard. Guys a starter, how much Zavala, Christensen, Curhan, and Corbett did we see last year again? Mauigoa will not be there when we pick, but you take him for the same reason you take Proctor minus maybe the LT. Freeling *could* be an upgrade at LT for the future. You don’t take Miller or Iheanahor because the position flexibility isn’t there, likely RT only guys. Those Utah guys are light in the ass, don’t want. Now I do WR. All extremely unproductive when compared to previous Round 1 WR. Tate- Gone Lemon- Complete player, not a burner, would take at 19 Tyson- Made of glass, Colorado washout  Cooper- Not the best hands. Like 300 of his yards were lucky ass stumble blooper looking poo. Bernard gives you similar but better in the 2nd. KC- Slaps then catches the ball. Lightning fast for about 20 yards. Good return man. poo QBs probably more to unlock. Would take at 19 if Proctor, Freeling, Lemon were gone. Washington guy- Lumbers, the smoothness Canales hyped for TMac, not there with him. We need a different style player.    
    • Logically yes. Boston has the right balance though. Jalen Brown is #2 in the paint and their best shooters are 17th and 19th. While our best shooters are #1 and #2 and we have one player in the top 50 for points in the paint. And my understanding looking at the information I just referenced is we were basically at the exact same paint percentage last year in Charles Lee's offense. At the end of the day we either want to compete for a playoff series winner and the finals or we just want to stumble our way to another play in. We've already done that with James Borrego.
×
×
  • Create New...