Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Free Agent Qbs. 2025


raleigh-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

I'd pass on Winston. He's a turnover machine. I'd rather stick with Dalton. 

Rather stick with someone who is already in place than to have Winston. 

We're in need of a lot of defensive help. Take Edge round 1 and maybe if an upside QB falls to round 2 we take one. 

I don't see any QB on this list, that isn't already on our roster, that will improve us. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, TEClemson53 said:

He couldn't even accel in Kyle Shanahan's system, it doesn't get much easier than being in SF with those weapons and that system. 

He played in 8 games for SF.. Thats a small sample size to say he couldn't accel. He's 4-4 in those 8 games, then was injured. Him being traded had more to do with him not fitting Shanahans system and injuries then it did anything else. 

Edited by scratched
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There will/should be more QBs- Geno Smith could be cut

{puts on poo defender armor} daniel jones cut/traded

derek Carr - cut

 

Herbo maybe on the trade block, I was once the biggest beliver......I suuure have cooled 

Rams have put out feelers about Mathew Stanford being traded, he could be cut too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’d just stick with the plan if I believed in it. Which is you have a guy who knows the NFL QB game, as well as anyone you have had maybe since Dan Henning (Chargers QB). Excluding Reich who was a radar blip basically. 
You work with him to identify your next move. Whatever you do about Dalton there needs to be two more people added. 
Keep in mind whoever they get may not not be the guy he wants, just the best he can get.  
Whoever Canales thinks is the best option, go. What I’d do, not having the benefit of being on the inside. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Anthony Hill Jr or give me death
    • We need a Sam Off Ball Backer to pair with Lloyd. Lloyd is a strong Interior Will especially in Pass Coverage- but that is also Trevin Wallace’s archetype. Need a Rozeboom style run stopper. Rodriguez and Allen fit that
    • There aren’t that many ways to screw Day 2 up.  That’d be them making an obvious reach, or selecting at one of the few positions that we are pretty solid at. Because as excited as we are for the growth and improvement this team is showing, it’s still not an overly talented or deep roster. Honestly, there aren’t really many positions I’d feel bad about. Feelings about Bryce aside (because we are not going to select a QB), it’s really RB (bad positional value) and that’s it. I guess OT too since we grabbed Freeling in Round 1.    While not as high on my wish list as other spots, you can justify WR or TE.     Interior offensive lineman who would likely take over an interior spot either this year (at center) or guard (next for cap casualty of Hunt or Lewis)? Fine by me.   Dlineman? Yes, that’s a highly rotational position and we have zero quality depth.    ILB? Yep, could stand for an upgrade over Wallace.    EDGE? Absolutely wouldn’t hate another option to spell Phillips, Scourton, and Princely.    FS?  Would love to add better coverage skill set to the backend of the defense. Moehrig and Ransom are great in run support but not as good deep. Adding a more traditional FS would allow us to mix and match/run some 3 safety sub packages and or a big nickel type look with a SS down near the line for better run support in possible pass downs.    CB? Could stand to get better at nickel. 
×
×
  • Create New...