Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If We Ended Up with Pick #1, Who Do You Beleive the PANTHERS would draft?


Hoenheim
 Share

Recommended Posts

I don't like this year's QB class much and would try to move down a few  slots.

 

Next year's class has a lot more talent than this year, trade down draft BPA or above Edge pick up anther first next year.. 

Get the 2025 #1 overall and draft one of the truly elite talents in that class and use the extra #1 and all the picks we get from the incoming sell off to reset.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CRA said:

I want them to trade down and draft all defense (generally speaking). 

we have a good OL.  We have young skill talent all over the map we are supposed to be developing.  We should go out and rent a good vet QB.  That should be the play. 

Go tell Deion to drive up our draft haul with another team.  Deion going to make a big fuss when the dust settles this season and sees us at #1.   

Just for sh¡ts and giggles, who is this "good vet QB?"

Edited by TD alt
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Next years class is pretty uncertain as well. People are touting Arch as a great prospect and we’ve barely seen him play. Then behind him there’s Nico? He’s struggled since they’ve played better comp. 
 

How many of these guys are confidently above  Sanders right now?

Maybe Arch does hit and becomes a clear QB1. And then what are your odds of getting him? That we draft a good edge, sign a better veteran QB, and yet still end up with the worst record in the league?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MartyClemons said:

Next years class is pretty uncertain as well. People are touting Arch as a great prospect and we’ve barely seen him play. Then behind him there’s Nico? He’s struggled since they’ve played better comp. 
 

How many of these guys are confidently above  Sanders right now?

Maybe Arch does hit and becomes a clear QB1. And then what are your odds of getting him? That we draft a good edge, sign a better veteran QB, and yet still end up with the worst record in the league?

Never really understood the “build the team then go get the QB” mentality. Say we don’t get a QB in the next draft and improve the team. We will likely win our way out of any top QB unless we trade up again or one falls to us. 
Ward and Sanders have issues but they could be good and I have been impressed with Ward. We have free agency and draft picks to improve the defense. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

Never really understood the “build the team then go get the QB” mentality

If you have a QB that is alright but not a franchise guy, it makes sense to build up the team and then go all in on a true franchise QB. Sort of how the Chiefs did it before going all in on Mahomes. They had a good team, but realized Smith wouldn't get them over the hump. So, they put all their chips into Mahomes' basket.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m not sure who I would choose since I have not been keeping up with the college prospects. I know two people who would be risky but could end up being really good:

Shadure Sanders-not sure I have spelled that correctly.

Jaxson Dart-if he can avoid the Ole Miss curse that claimed Chad Kelly and Matt Corral.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

Never really understood the “build the team then go get the QB” mentality. Say we don’t get a QB in the next draft and improve the team. We will likely win our way out of any top QB unless we trade up again or one falls to us. 
Ward and Sanders have issues but they could be good and I have been impressed with Ward. We have free agency and draft picks to improve the defense. 

I mean, if you DO want a rookie QB for your very own and want the top one or two then yeah you probably won't have the top pick again in 2026. 

I am not saying I want that, just agreeing that you take one when you have the best shot at one rather than waiting.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Most are afraid to admit Sanders is legit because they don't like his father.

 

Sad, but it's the truth!

I think it's pretty universal that Sanders and Ward are the top 2 QBs in this draft.  People may not like him because of his dad, but he is talented. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, strato said:

I mean, if you DO want a rookie QB for your very own and want the top one or two then yeah you probably won't have the top pick again in 2026. 

I am not saying I want that, just agreeing that you take one when you have the best shot at one rather than waiting.

I feel like we invested in this OL, took a RB that can catch high in the draft, drafted a pass catching TE, and a big target WR to better evaluate Bryce AKA help the QB. Now we know Bryce isn’t the answer but we still have this whole “evaluation” setup on offense which could be good for a rookie QB. It’s not a bad time to draft one honestly. Maybe sign a vet WR and extend BC and your offense should be ready to grow with a young QB. Use FA and the rest of the draft on defense. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He’s overthrown WRs numerous times deep,I don’t think his arm strength there is a problem, def seems to be and issue in the 20-30 yard range, I don’t see a lot of outbreaking routes being completed, whether that’s due to his lack of ability to drive the ball to the outside hash or our WRs, especially XL cornering at the top of there routes. regardless of his weaknesses, the question is can a team be built around him to mask them, or can he overcome those weaknesses and adapt. I know it’s beating a dead horse, but something big is missing from Bryce’s qb play that’s leading to so many sub 200 yard passing games, all signs lead to a physical trait that’s the cause of this, wether it’s arm strength or his height  
    • That was fully intentional, because something people who engage in hyperbole can't stand is to be systematically told why and how they don't have a clue. It's the prevalence of this farcical idea that everyone's opinions are valid and the more impassioned they are about them, the more valid they are. And the point of the post wasn't merely to cut the knees of the exaggerators, but to illustrate why it shouldn't seem miraculous that someone like Mayfield and Darnold could come through Charlotte and fail and then suddenly seem much more successful elsewhere, when the reality is that there's far more to being successful at that position than one's own talent. It's also why young quarterbacks like Caleb Williams and Cam Ward deserve much longer leashes to determine their long-term viability and not be written off immediately, because the circumstances surrounding them are hardly conducive to success.
    • I think at some point you top out what God gave you.  He can use leverage via his mechanics to maximize what he has and When he pays attention to it the throws are better.    IMO as a layman a lot of it is what kind of ‘headroom’ you have. The guys who are gifted don’t have to use maximum effort to get good results and stay within themselves but they have it in reserve. They can do an arm throw for substantial distance without max effort.    I think what we may be seeing with these ‘lasers’ is a throw that Bryce puts the max effort into and does his mechanics right and has his base right and it works together.    To get to the payoff here, I think his best velocity throws take dall that whereas  a naturally gifted guy doesn’t need to go full effort to get that same velocity. I have said this three or four times over the years and it never gets picked up on but the accuracy is more consistent with an easier motion and max effort can produce less predictable location. It is a baseball pitcher thing but it applies to throwing a pass too. It isn’t that you can’t make an accurate throw with full effort it is just not as reliably accurate to the same degree. Someone said something about his pro day and that is where I saw it too. He took a little extra step on the deep throws. Some call it a hitch but I don’t see it that way because I don’t see it on shorter throws. He does it trying to get distance. I saw that and just wanted no part of it at 1.1 . That is not tne characteristic of a 1.1 passer.  He should have been at best, late first  I had him second day. Of course I am no one and certainly not a pro evaluator, it is just that he was so easy to suss out. It is kind of in your face obvious.  They must have thought they could fix him. Changing a lifelong throwing motion with the footwork tied into it is not fuging easy. Anyone that had decent success with ‘their’ way and tried to change it to get more, can tell you that.     
×
×
  • Create New...