Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Brady Christensen praise


BeenPounding
 Share

Recommended Posts

Can we MAYBE focus on some positive.....

Brady Christensen, in my opinion, is certainly a key player we need to retain at the end of the season.  He is the perfect 6th offensive lineman.  He needs to be paid as a top back-up lineman after the season.  The guy is so solid and versatile.  Anyone else agree? 

What's the over/under before this post tailspins into the negative?

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 BC was a solid pick. I agree that Rhule made a major blunder by not allowing him to play LT initially, which was/is his natural position. I’d love to see him stay but I wouldn’t  blame him for wanting to catch a 1-way ticket out of Charlotte.

Imagine how things would be in Carolina if the team hadn’t wasted a 2nd round on TMJ at #58 and picked Alabama center Creed Humphrey instead and then nabbed Brady in the next round. We could have been set at RT (Motion), LT, and C for most of the decade then drafted some solid players in the mid rounds to solidify the guard positions on  the interior line.

With the exception of Moton, all of those guys would still be on their rookie deals and we could have used our draft picks and cap money to build a stronger roster with better talent.

Edited by SCO96
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's his 4th year and he is a backup. Great to have but he isn't healthy enough to make me want to see a long term deal. I don't get BC. Physically talented but he kept getting beat by competition at so many different spots.

They need more rookie contracts on the online with Ickey coming up for his payday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don’t go back and look at the espn but there live it definitely said 1 shot 1 goal when it happened. I guess they had not added them yet. Still allowing goals that early is rough. Blue line is a total disaster still. Even with Slavin back. Miller and Nikishin keep making mistakes after mistakes. 
    • I generally disagree with the concept of picking a position because of value early in the draft. For instance, if there's a really good safety, RB or ILB at pick 10, I'm choosing him over a project WR or DE. Better players make the team better. A bunch of ok players will give you an ok team. The number 1 goal of the draft should be to improve the overall talent on the team. Not to fill positions of need.  Deciding beforehand that you're picking a LT in the first or second round because Ickey went down is not the way to improve the team. Now if Dan has similar grades on 2 or 3 players and one happens to be a LT, then yeah go for it. But don't pass on your guy at ILB because you have a gap at LT or need to improve the pass rush with a DE. When those guys don't pan out then you haven't improved your team. But that LB could have been a franchise cornerstone for years to come. See Luke Kuechly and Christian McCaffrey. 
    • Thank God we are inthe NFC South--
×
×
  • Create New...