Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

DJ Wonnum effect


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

I agree it looked better.  We no longer look historically bad. But we still need to make a lot of additions in the offseason.  

But playing against the Giants does help statistically.  

Bears offensive line is much worse and the defense couldn’t do anything. Morgan is building the right way but 2025 draft class needs to hit on both sides

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, NAS said:

Bears offensive line is much worse and the defense couldn’t do anything. Morgan is building the right way but 2025 draft class needs to hit on both sides

Bears offensive line may be worse, but their offense overall is better.  Statistically, the Giants offense is the worst in the NFL.  

But as I said, it was still a good showing. In truth, the defense has played better overall the last few weeks.  I thought they played well against the Saints at least in terms of the pass defense.  The run defense still needs a lot of work.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wonnum looked good against the pass and the run, and that was exciting to see. Weak opponents sure, but he looked great for his first game back after all his setbacks this year. Makes a massive difference for Clowney as well as teams can’t only focus on him. 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Bears offensive line may be worse, but their offense overall is better.  Statistically, the Giants offense is the worst in the NFL.  

But as I said, it was still a good showing. In truth, the defense has played better overall the last few weeks.  I thought they played well against the Saints at least in terms of the pass defense.  The run defense still needs a lot of work.  

I don’t know about that we have young really good WRs and a up and coming stud TE on rookie deals, compared DJ Moore making big time money Keenan Allen eating up cap on the last year of his deal. Cole Kemet makes 12 mil a year compared to 1 mill a year for JT. If Brooks is anything close to his college days him and Chubba will be dynamic for a very small price overall as far as cap implications are concerned. Our line is way better then theirs I don’t know what you’re seeing but insert a QB and we’re a very good offense at a very manageable price where we’ll be able to add pieces because we have so many rookie contract major contributors. I think our offense is way better then Chicago especially moving forward the next 2-3 years.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Bears offensive line may be worse, but their offense overall is better.  Statistically, the Giants offense is the worst in the NFL.  

But as I said, it was still a good showing. In truth, the defense has played better overall the last few weeks.  I thought they played well against the Saints at least in terms of the pass defense.  The run defense still needs a lot of work.  

My bad lol you mean Bears compared to Giants I thought you meant compared to us. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NAS said:

Defense looked rejuvenated yesterday, first time seeing an actual pass rush.  
 

6 tackles (2 for loss)

1 sack

2 QB hits

If we had Derrick Brown back they would really be cooking 

Wonnum was great yesterday.  Exactly what the defense needs right now.

 

Morgan needs to stay patient and stick with the youth movement.  Keep adding young hungry guys and let them compete. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure 19 is too high for Rodriguez anymore.  He looks to be moving up boards, but it could be smokescreens.  
    • I see XL this way---great athlete.  Good person.  When we drafted him, we knew he was raw.  One year of WR in college (starting) and in HS, he was a QB, I believe. We knew we would need patience with him.  I think year 3 will be make or break.  He is older, and I think that people with his athletic ability have always been better than those with less---but those with less can become more successful.  Why is that?  in my view, it is mental. XL can learn the mechanics and nuances of playing WR if he becomes focused on it and works at it.  I had the opportunity to talk to Armanti Edwards one day after OTAs (great guy) and he discussed how overwhelming it was.  He seemed shocked.  At that time, I knew that Fox hated the pick (I heard him mock Armanti to another coach when he saw Edwards drop a punt from a jugs machine--then I saw Armanti look back at Fox as if to suggest that he was feeling the pressure to please the coach. We forget that these are kids in their early 20s.  At the time, Fox was a lame duck.  Remember when he had Clausen as the #3 QB and was forced to move him up the ladder?  I liked Fox, but I think the climate and culture was influenced by the politics.  Currently, I see another Wr from SC who is struggling, but he is ina  very nurturing, positive culture. Let's see what happens with XL.  I am frustrated too---but XL was a second round talent who was raw and we traded up to get him.  He had 500 yards as a rookie--lets call 2025 a sophomore slump and see if we can't get at least 50 yards per game out of him.  If not, cut bait.
    • Sadiq feels like a lazy comp.  Sure he would be a big improvement over what we have but at a position we don't and maybe can't (midget qb) utilize.  I hope the staff puts together a list of players you automatically take at 19 (Freeling, Lemon, Downs, Faulk) and if none are there, trade back to look at (Thieneman, McNeil-Warren, Proctor, Lomu, Allen, Iheanachor, Banks, Woods).  I get the people that think an OT would be a waste because we temporarily patched that hole, and ILB and safety are a waste because that is high to take those particular positions, but by trading back we get extra picks to fill every need.  A draft that has an OT, S, ILB, slot WR, and C would really put us in a good position moving forward if we get an extra first three rounds additional pick.   
×
×
  • Create New...