Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bryce Young - Good and Bad, what say you?


CLG
 Share

Recommended Posts

I watched most of this game from an airport and plane, saw almost everything and at least followed updates for what I didn’t see. Landing now but I’m curious on yalls take.

Good:

Pocket Movement and Awareness

Improvisation in the pocket, extending the play

Clear Confidence and Demand all game

Pushing the ball downfield 

Throwing the 50/50 1:1 Balls

Good decision making passing and running 

Accuracy outside of the redzone

Composure - not only with defensive pressure but with receivers dropping balls and multiple dumbass offensive line false starts penalties ruining and potentially ruining drives he kept cool.

Ability to fit the ball in tight windows.

Juice - You gotta show some of that personality and dawg to drive energy to your team.

Cons:

Redzone, have to at least give us a chance to catch the ball. Threw plenty that may as well been a throw away.

Ball security in the pocket still an issue.

 

Im landing now but tried hard to find pros and cons quickly and was hard to find cons truthfully as fast as the pros. What say you? 

 

 

  • Pie 7
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

With the game on the line over two drives, Bruce threw it away on a must make third down, threw a couple bailout DPIs, and completed clutch handoffs. 

finally reached the elusive 7 ypa threshold 

Dude led a game winning TD drive despite a drop by XL that woulda gone for 30...

The Thielen throw is a TD without DPI.

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tbe said:

Compared to last year and the beginning of this year, he is throwing when guys are “nfl open”.

He’s much more willing to push the ball downfield.

He’s more accurate.

Redzone passing needs work.

This game was not the same as the packers game last year. This was a very good defense.

He’ll get another year here. If he keeps improving, he might be worth keeping.

He actually threw a couple balls he previously didn't, but still left some out with throw aways in the end zone and out of bounds on scrambles. He looked much better but still limits the playbook and that will never change just based on physics

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am trying to remember when I EVER said reach for need. My thing if someone falls you jump, if you can trade back a few slots and get help at the right value and pick up some ammo to move up from 51 which I think is outside the money zone, then you do that.   Take a WR later. Plenty of capable WRs have come from the 3rd round. Though this year I would go for C there if there was a reasonable choice. Take a TE if you must. I see more reason to take WR than TE. I think you give guys drafted two years ago and last year a chance to develop before cancelling them.    I think it is kind of unrealistic to throw everything all in on offense in hopes of going deep in the playoffs after an 8-10 year, even if it did have some nice bright spots in it.    And outside of this argument but relevant to it, I am bothered by Canales and Morgan and their apparent posture that we have arrived and are now in the big boy club. I don’t know where that comes from. They are out there talking like they are winners at 8-10. Backing into the playoffs in a real convoluted tie breaker scenario. They had some good games, yes. But the big feather n the cap, the LA Rams matchups, did you see what the Rams did? They didn’t fire the coaches but they fired their defensive backs. Bryce beat them yes, and it was pretty, but it was kind of like the Bucs and Mike Evans picking on our decimated secondary in 2022. Someone (Wilks) went down for allowing that to happen and they went down in LA too.  Wr aren’t as good as a whole lot of homers think we are. Shore up the trenches.    I think too many fans buy into it because they are so starved for anything that looks like a winner. 
    • How exactly does one win OROY "by default"? Wouldn't winning the award mean that of the two, McMillon stayed strong the entire year while the other guy didn't and fizzled out? That's like saying Secretariat only won by default because the other horse stopped moving midway through the race. Absolutely zero logic in that statement, which makes me very glad that I've never really paid much attention to Walterfoozball.
    • I agree, teams in the past have fired the HC in order to retain a coach on staff...hell it happened to Mcderp this year, rams in the past and Im missing another.  The fall off for the Panthers team defense was huge once Mcderp leftd and Ron could not fix it even when he named himself DC. 
×
×
  • Create New...