Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Philosophy of drafting a raw prospect


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

Putting all your chips on a "raw prospect", seems foolish to me. Having to take the time of training him up and then hoping for the best in the end.

If the move doesn't work out, it's then a waste of a pick and time. This team has been down this road before, and I can't think of one that has worked out. No matter what position.

Stop gambling and playing "magic eight" ball in the draft. Choose players that you are sure have the necessary tools to excel. Pick a player who checks all the boxes, especially with a high pick.

 

Edited by Jmac
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, countryboi said:

What is the context of this?

The late first round WR that seems to have hands of stone. Hoping that he will "learn" to catch properly and that they can train him up.

Edited by Jmac
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Risk/reward. When it's an older prospect who is still considered raw that's a serious red flag. When it's a young guy with off the charts physical ability that you seem highly coachable then it's tempting. A lot of raw prospects get drafted in the mid-late rounds. I mean, pretty much all of those guys are either going to be raw or have serious concerns on whether or not their college success can translate to the NFL.

  • Pie 3
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Jmac said:

Putting all your chips on a "raw prospect", seems foolish to me. Having to take the time of training him up and then hoping for the best in the end.

If the move doesn't work out, it's then a waste of a pick and time. This team has been down this road before, and I can't think of one that has worked out. No matter what position.

Stop gambling and playing "magic eight" ball in the draft. Choose players that you are sure have the necessary tools to excel. Pick a player who checks all the boxes, especially with a high pick.

 


DJ Moore was pretty raw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Risk/reward. When it's an older prospect who is still considered raw that's a serious red flag. When it's a young guy with off the charts physical ability that you seem highly coachable then it's tempting. 

Yeah, I feel like this is what people are missing the most with Legette.

Cam Newton was "raw".  One could argue Thomas Davis was "raw".  But those guys still had multiple years of college production (albeit one of Cam's years was at Blinn).  Legette wasn't even a middling receiver his first 4 years; his production was nonexistent.  It is very concerning that his best and only year came when he was older and more experienced than most of the guys covering him.  When will that be the case in the NFL?  Is he "raw" so much as he just isn't that good?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Isn’t XL playing with an injured wrist? I honestly think he will get his drops corrected. The man clearly worked hard on his route running this offseason and it looks to have paid off. 

 

It's pissing me off. He had a terrible hand injury weeks ago and everyone has forgot about it. Just like they forgot the hospital hit he took on like the 3rd snap of the game. By some miracle he was able to keep playing. He's probably got 5 other injuries we don't know about. He's a raw rookie taken with the 32nd pick and made most of our fans retarded. Mingo, TMJ, and DJohnson were supposed to be starting while XL learned how to NFL WR. Just silly to read most of the comments. 

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dude never dropped balls in college.  He was aggressive and high pointed balls all the time.  I think either something is still wrong with his wrist or he just needs to get his confidence.  I don't think he was/is as raw as some people think.  He is a rookie at the end of the day.  Just like many rookies on this team that many here want to judge after a couple of games. I remember when many on this board were saying Derek Brown was a bust after a few games.   I thought XL should have caught that pass yesterday and hopefully whatever is going on can be corrected.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Basbear said:

 

It's pissing me off. He had a terrible hand injury weeks ago and everyone has forgot about it. Just like they forgot the hospital hit he took on like the 3rd snap of the game. By some miracle he was able to keep playing.
 

Yeah bunch of people who’ve never played sports in their life don’t appreciate the hit he took. 

He probably went for a CT after the game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

Yeah bunch of people who’ve never played sports in their life don’t appreciate the hit he took. 

He probably went for a CT after the game. 

Legit 45 MPH car wreck Gs. the next series he was in the huddle, Id be telling the trainers- "Im batman"...

but fug him for catching 98.4% of a deep pass he had to reach out to his extreme long catch radius for. 

Edited by Basbear
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's time this team stops gambling on this type of stuff. The Ladd vs XL is a prime example for me our team is not good enough to take on the risk of the gamble. 

If someone has elite traits coming in that you know will translate stop bypassing them for the size/speed specimen in a hope of coaching them up 

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So the last guy who had the job got hired by his former team directly into a role he has no direct experience in?
    • Hard to pass up millions for a couple of days work per week for a coaching gig in the NFL that is 60-80 hours each week during the season and a more relaxed 50 hours a week during the off season. Yeah, I'd love to see him as our DC but hard to see him giving up the cushy job there if he gets it. And he's going to be a great commentator for the network.
    • Really, I think that is where negotiations come in. If you've got a QB getting you to 10 wins but statistically he's not a great performer, then you say look you can take $22 million or you can try it on the market. Because let's face it, out there, any leadership skills that we're seeing aren't going to be on the table, it's just going to be performance and that lands him in the QB2 market, which is much, much less lucrative (although any of us would love that money).  No one is saying that Bryce will be a $50 million QB, barring something short of a miraculous jump. I'm just saying that if we are winning somehow with him at the helm, then it would be fuging stupid to dive back into the rookie pool all over again. Let's say we do hit the 10 win mark, heck, let's call it 11 and a second round in the playoffs. I think we can all say that would be a really uplifting result and one that should be doable if we have good play. What do we do then? Here's what I would offer if I were Morgan and Tepper. $25 million a year for 3 years, each year with up to $10 million in incentives for touchdowns, wins, playoff depth, being under 10 interceptions, completing a full season, passing yardage milestones, taking less than 15 sacks. Look, Bryce isn't a Ferrari, he isn't a Corvette, or a mid-level BMW. He's probably a new Toyota Sienna that will definitely get you somewhere and bring the whole team along with it, no fuss but not a lot of pizazz.  And really, it's about the destination, not about what drove you there.
×
×
  • Create New...