Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

OFFICIAL Dallas Cowboys vs Carolina Panthers week 15 GameDay thread


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Hoenheim said:

This game is gonna open a huge can of worms for panther fans everywhere lol

so many people crowned bryce on a very small sample size of good games and now he has a horrible game against a bad cowboys team

im not saying this wipes out the progress that bryce made. But boy oh boy does it mean that QB isnt a solved problem for this organization. This game shows you its still an unknown.

i wouldnt expect the panthers to draft a qb in R1  but . Any other round? I wouldn't be surprised. Especially if bryce has another bad game or multiple before the year ends

Brilliant 

Top 5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, I think what we’ve learned in this stretch since BY has been back in the lineup is BY isn’t as bad as he looked, but he still isn’t the future, and Canales is a really good coach who can get the most out of any QB.  Today, the defense and OL have been a huge problem, but I think we’re still in this game without Bryce’s turnovers.  He’s not as horrible as he looked last year and the first two games this year, but he is still only a backup-level QB in the pros.

The fumbles are one thing, but that can of corn he just threw on top of that?  We’ve seen enough.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mav1234 said:

Whatever Young had on his deep throws vs KC and TB has just been gone today.

If we see another game like this this year I think we should consider a QB if one actually falls to us.

Honestly my friend I'm looking at it like those games were possibly a fugazi just like that Packers game was last season.

These small sample sizes of better play aren't enough to judge. At best right now all we can say is he is up and down. And his definition of up really isn't that high not to justify a first overall pick. But his definition of down? It's really bad.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...