Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Current draft order

CRA

By CRA,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

Panthers sitting at #7. 

Giants just fumbled the bag.  How you going to play a QB that just don’t give a fug like this guy and think you are safe lol

image.gif.b77b7898354a28037b954b0c830473bf.gif

  1. New England Patriots: 3-13 record; .465 strength of schedule
  2. Tennessee Titans: 3-13; .509 SOS
  3. New York Giants: 3-13; .551 SOS
  4. Cleveland Browns: 3-12; .537 SOS
  5. Jacksonville Jaguars: 4-12; .472 SOS
  6. New York Jets: 4-12; .496 SOS
  7. Carolina Panthers: 4-12; .498 SOS
  8. Las Vegas Raiders: 4-12; .546 SOS
  9. Chicago Bears: 4-12; .553 SOS
  10. New Orleans Saints: 5-11; .513 SOS
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ProcessBlue2 Mentor

ProcessBlue2

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, CRA said:

Panthers sitting at #7. 

Giants just fumbled the bag.  How you going to play a QB that just don’t give a fug like this guy and think you are safe lol

image.gif.b77b7898354a28037b954b0c830473bf.gif

  1. New England Patriots: 3-13 record; .465 strength of schedule
  2. Tennessee Titans: 3-13; .509 SOS
  3. New York Giants: 3-13; .551 SOS
  4. Cleveland Browns: 3-12; .537 SOS
  5. Jacksonville Jaguars: 4-12; .472 SOS
  6. New York Jets: 4-12; .496 SOS
  7. Carolina Panthers: 4-12; .498 SOS
  8. Las Vegas Raiders: 4-12; .546 SOS
  9. Chicago Bears: 4-12; .553 SOS
  10. New Orleans Saints: 5-11; .513 SOS

I'm told he only scored 5 TDs today because he is surrounded by pro bowlers and hall of fame talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tukafan21 Grand Master

tukafan21

Posted
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

Yes the Giants did, but so did we last week.

We'd be sitting at #2 right now had we lost last week.

And now that I think about it after my other post in a different thread about how I think NE beats the Bills next week.

There is a very real chance that winning last week will end up costing us the #1 pick in the draft.

Which means we could have traded back into about the pick we're going to end up having in the end.  So that win last week will less be about the draft position it cost us, but more the additional draft picks we would have picked up by trading back to the same spot we'll end up.

So that win might have cost us a couple extra future 1st round picks in reality.

 

Edited by tukafan21
Link to comment
Share on other sites
tukafan21 Grand Master

tukafan21

Posted
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, frankw said:

I hope we don't try to get cute and start trading up with any of these additional picks. Just let the draft fall to us.

Yes and no

No, don't do it with any of the picks in the first 4 rounds, let those chips fall.

But I'd be all for using all of the 5th round and later picks to get additional 3rd and 4th rounders which have a better chance on hitting.  I'd rather have 2 more late 3rds or early 4ths than have the 6 picks in rounds 5 and 7.

11 rookies aren't making the Week 1 roster anyways, I'd package them all up for whatever we can get in the 4th round or better.  And if we can't get them, I'd just trade them for picks in next year's draft where we might be able to use them to trade up for a QB if needed. 

Edited by tukafan21
  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Admiral Ackbar Community Regular

Admiral Ackbar

Posted
Posted (edited)

very real possibly we have top 5 pick, at worse something like 9. Could be as high as 2 if Jags, Gaints and Jets win and we lose against the Falcons.

My hope is we are inside the top 5 with a team like the Giants or Raiders chomping at the bit to get a QB and they trade up so we can gather some top picks. Would be a nice to "recoup" from the Bryce trade and still possibly get a top edge rusher. 

And if that doesnt work out, hey we still will probably get a top defensive player inside the top 10.

Edited by Admiral Ackbar
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SCO96 Veteran

SCO96

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, frankw said:

I hope we don't try to get cute and start trading up with any of these additional picks. Just let the draft fall to us.

Agreed. This team is woefully lacking in talent, especially on the defensive side of the ball. A shrewd GM should be able to walk away with 3 starters on defense in 2025 just by picking the best available defensive player on the board when when our number come up during the the first 2 days of the draft.

We could even find a starting center to replace Corbett. A stat I posted a couple of weeks ago showed that 50% of the CENTERS in the NFL are found on day 3 of the draft or are undrafted. Cade Mays has been better than I thought, but you could probably find a better player to play the position in round 4.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ProcessBlue2 Mentor

ProcessBlue2

Posted
Posted
19 minutes ago, SCO96 said:

Agreed. This team is woefully lacking in talent, especially on the defensive side of the ball. A shrewd GM should be able to walk away with 3 starters on defense in 2025 just by picking the best available defensive player on the board when when our number come up during the the first 2 days of the draft.

We could even find a starting center to replace Corbett. A stat I posted a couple of weeks ago showed that 50% of the CENTERS in the NFL are found on day 3 of the draft or are undrafted. Cade Mays has been better than I thought, but you could probably find a better player to play the position in round 4.

Cade Mays = Matt Paradis

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      Mini camp tweets

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      How am I all over the place?  I'm still saying that. I'm saying that Chark at his best and T-Mac right now, on the same team right now for the 2025 season, T-Mac would be ahead of him on the depth chart Week 1. Because in the same way everyone is saying, "T-Mac hasn't played a snap in the NFL yet", the very same is true to say, "nothing Chark did in his past matters moving forward" His peak was a 1,008 yard season where he was the only decent WR on a terrible team.  He didn't put up the 1k yard season because he was a great WR, it was because of how bad the rest of them on the team were. His stats aren't the same as his ability, and his ability was never all that good to begin with. Hell, most of this board agrees that T-Mac is our #1 right now, even if Thielen is Bryce's #1 option early in the saeson just because of the comfort level there, he's still just a slot safety valve and T-Mac is our #1. If you put peak Chark on the roster RIGHT NOW (even without T-Mac)... is anyone even putting him over Thielen, XL, or Coker going into this season? I'm honestly not sure many of us would consider him as such, because even at his best, he was just a JAG.  So if the same people who are okay with T-Mac being ahead of those guys right now, wouldn't put Chark above them, how can you in the same breath say Chark was better than T-Mac already is now?
    • LinvilleGorge
      Mini camp tweets

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • tukafan21
      Mini camp tweets

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
×
×
  • Create New...