Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

some rando's opinion... Evero *will be* first to be fired


Frank9999
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, CRA said:

said it before the first ball was kicked off...Evero was setup to be the fall guy this year from the jump.  Whatever happened this year, Canales team was going to be setup at a minimum...to at least be able to point at Evero for blame/change. 

Evero wasn't allowed to leave.  They gutted the D roster.  Everyone knew it was going to go backwards by front office design.  

It's a scapegoat business.  Generally there is always someone going into a season where if it goes bad will be the blame guy.   It's why I like clean slates without holdovers.  The holdovers are always the blame guys.  That can be coaching or front office.   It's why Fitterer should of gone w/ Rhule.  Why we shouldn't of hired Morgan.  Always a carry over to lay blame at their feet. 

He was put in a bad situation and he should have been allowed to interview elsewhere.  That said, he did pick out a lot of his guys to bring in,  a lot of players don't seem to like playing in his system, and I personally just hate his scheme in general.   Both things can be true, he was put in a crappy situation, and he didn't do a very good job also.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you separate defensive playcalling vs personnel, it’s a bit hard to tell IMO because the talent has been so depleted. But he’s did get a lot of his guys (Jackson, Fuller, Hill, Robinson, Jewell, etc) And the lack of pass rushers is one of the worst d situations in the league the past 5 years easy.

I will say, he was advertised as a Fangio disciple but blitz heavy with simulated pressures all over the place, and he originally lived up to that.  Now, I don’t know if he’s changing unknowingly or failing to prescribe what works with our crap talent. But it’s not quite working.

Honestly, this could be a defensive Joe Brady situation but I do think we’d be better suited to have Canales identify what he wants to build.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, thunderraiden said:

Im sorry but just based on that companies unemployment premium possibly going up if the fired employee's new job falls through and how flimsy pips hold up in unemployment court as opposed to a voluntary quit, that is quite possibly the most retarded thing i have ever heard an employer do.

Imagine working for them every day. I mean that literal. 67 days at one point 10+hours per day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, NYPantherFan said:

Why would he be the first name fired? He's likely to be a HC candidate even with this unimpressive defense. Hold out to see if he gets hired so we can get draft comp.

All that is hot air IMO, hate to say it but he's just an interview candidate for teams to tick the Rooney Rule check list 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was thinking this, I don't think he's the worst, but he's taking the brunt of everything.  I think when provided specific personnel for his scheme, it can be good to great, but it takes specific personnel that fits his specific scheme.  Problem is, Everything wont always be perfect, need to adapt to the personnel you have.  There's the old poker adage, "Play the hand you're dealt, not the one you wish you had" and because he couldn't adapt to his personnel, he'll lose his job. He'll rebound and be a fine DC somewhere, just not here.

As for us, was thinking about what options are out there and thought about.  Would wonder if Tepper and wilks would be willing to mend their bridge.  I do think Wilks can be a good defensive coordinator, do think some of his old concepts would be decent with our personnel especially with his blitz heavy approach.  That said, shouldn't be our first choice, but I also don't think it would be the worst option considering there's still players here with relationships with Steve and they clearly wanted him to stay in 2022.  Just a thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Carolina Cajun said:

Was thinking this, I don't think he's the worst, but he's taking the brunt of everything.  I think when provided specific personnel for his scheme, it can be good to great, but it takes specific personnel that fits his specific scheme.  Problem is, Everything wont always be perfect, need to adapt to the personnel you have.  There's the old poker adage, "Play the hand you're dealt, not the one you wish you had" and because he couldn't adapt to his personnel, he'll lose his job. He'll rebound and be a fine DC somewhere, just not here.

As for us, was thinking about what options are out there and thought about.  Would wonder if Tepper and wilks would be willing to mend their bridge.  I do think Wilks can be a good defensive coordinator, do think some of his old concepts would be decent with our personnel especially with his blitz heavy approach.  That said, shouldn't be our first choice, but I also don't think it would be the worst option considering there's still players here with relationships with Steve and they clearly wanted him to stay in 2022.  Just a thought.

I don't think Wilks could be drug back here. He will be in college somewhere is my guess. I'm a bit of a nerd when it comes to coach vacancies/hirings. I don't see it happening. I think it will be somebody with a clear connection to Brandt, Morgan, Canales, or Goodwin. 

Bob Saleh, Joe Cullen, Aaron Curry, Ken Norton Jr, somebody in that realm. If we are lucky, James Bettcher.

IMO we are more likely to land Ron than Wilks which I think would do more harm than good.

Edited by ProcessBlue2
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, ProcessBlue2 said:

I don't think Wilks could be drug back here. He will be in college somewhere is my guess. I'm a bit of a nerd when it comes to coach vacancies/hirings. I don't see it happening. I think it will be somebody with a clear connection to Brandt, Morgan, Canales, or Goodwin. 

Bob Saleh, Joe Cullen, Aaron Curry, Ken Norton Jr, somebody in that realm. If we are lucky, James Bettcher.

IMO we are more likely to land Ron than Wilks which I think would do more harm than good.

wouldnt be sad to see robert saleh here.  Bad HC, but he knows defense.  Similar IMO to Wade Phillips.  I do know Canales being young has a limited connection to other NFL coaches which will/would make the search a little different than some.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...