Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If Graham is gone, fo you take Carter?


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

It’s very likely that all of Will Johnson, Mason Graham, and Tetairoa McMillan will be gone.

A safety hasn’t gone in the top 10 since Jamal Adams in 2017. But if there’s a safety that deserves to go in the top 10 it’s Malaki Starks.

He graded top 10 against the run and the pass at his position and his ball skills are insane.

 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MillionDollarCam said:

It’s very likely that all of Will Johnson, Mason Graham, and Tetairoa McMillan will be gone.

A safety hasn’t gone in the top 10 since Jamal Adams in 2017. But if there’s a safety that deserves to go in the top 10 it’s Malaki Starks.

He graded top 10 against the run and the pass at his position and his ball skills are insane.

 

A ball hawking safety; not an in-the-box safety.  Great hands, but not overly aggressive given chase and definitely doesn't pop when tackling. He strikes me as corner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 45catfan said:

If he kills it in the offseason workouts he will be.  Remember, this dude came up just a few yards short of breaking Berry Sanders record.

image.png.1cdd6a3ca40a4761b0dd608fe0d11cf1.png

image.png.65fef559c0f93c16bf4d8a673ef1865d.png

 

He won't be on many draft boards. I have 2 rbs I would take over him and I would not draft either of them higher than late 3rd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Taking a safety in the top 10?  No way I would do that, unless he is Sean Taylor or Ed Reed which Starks isn’t.  We would be lucky if Carter lasts to #8.  There are the two Georgia edge guys to fall back on if he is gone 

Edited by Shocker
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Taking a safety in the top 10?  No way I would do that, unless he is Sean Taylor or Ed Reed which Starks isn’t.  We would be lucky if Carter lasts to #8.  There are the two Georgia edge guys to fall back on if he is gone 

Has to be generational and Starks is not.  Top 10 you take players that help make (QB, WR, OT) or break (Edge, CB) games.  All other non-STs positions have to be close to, if not generational, for consideration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, R0CKnR0LLA said:

Very possible the top 7 taken are the 2 QBs, Carter, Graham, TMac, Travis Hunter and Will Johnson.

And the phone's not ringing, nobody wants to trade up. So you can't trade down either.

Who you taking then?

 

It's got to be pearce Jr or a Georgia dawg.(both are edges and scary)

Plenty have mocked the combine, but I feel its key for this draft. I think Carter will measure small, even with all the PEDs those guys take. 

 

I think 10 DL will be in the first 22 picks. 

 

*But there are stud OTs still there, some team would trade up for campbell or Simmons. Banks as well, that 8th spot is looking like the best spot for a trade up for a LT. There should be heavy action here, no BS. 

So take the best DLman or best offer for a OT stud. 

Edited by Basbear
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...