Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

ProFootballFocus presents: Carolina Panthers 7-round mock draft: Bryce Young gets some help, defense gets reinforcements


Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

ound 1, Pick 8: WR Tetairoa McMillan, Arizona

Adding a true dominant X receiver like McMillan would help the Panthers unlock the full potential of 2024 first-round pick Xavier Legette. Despite frequently facing rolled coverage, McMillan still put up elite production in 2024, hauling in 86 catches for 1,327 yards and eight touchdowns. He thrived in contested situations, securing 18 of 32 such targets—often against multiple defenders—while also forcing an impressive 29 missed tackles.

Round 2, Pick 58: S Malaki Starks, Georgia

Starks' production dipped in 2024, but his coverage performance in 2023 showcased his impact. That season, he allowed just 18 completions on 37 targets while recording three interceptions and seven pass breakups.

Round 3, Pick 74: DI Aeneas Peebles, Virginia Tech

Peebles pairs his agility and quickness with excellent hand usage, making him a highly effective interior pass rusher. He led all defensive interior players in college football with a 27.3% win rate on true pass sets.

Round 4, Pick 109: T Brandon Crenshaw-Dickson, Florida

Crenshaw-Dickson transferred to Florida from San Diego State for the 2024 season and delivered the best performance of his career, allowing just one sack and no quarterback hits.

Round 4, Pick 112: DI Jordan Phillips, Maryland

Phillips is a force against the run, recording 20 stops and seven tackles for loss or no gain in 2024.

Round 5, Pick 140: LB Kobe King, Penn State

King's 89.2 run-defense grade in 2024 ranked fifth among all linebackers in this year's draft class.

Round 5, Pick 146: LB Billy Bowman Jr., Oklahoma

Bowman has a natural instinct for making plays in coverage, tallying 11 interceptions and 10 forced incompletions over the past three seasons at Oklahoma.

Round 5, Pick 163: WR Antwane Wells Jr., Mississippi

Wells was a big-play machine in 2024, averaging 19.4 yards per reception. He converted 20 of his 29 catches into first downs, including six touchdowns.

Round 7, Pick 228: CB Mac McWilliams, UCF

McWilliams transferred to UCF from UAB last year and allowed just 23 receptions for 137 yards on 41 throws into his coverage.

I think I hate all of these picks except for Peebles. I hope this isn't close to our actual draft...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is actually an amazing draft, not sure why people are complaining about us prioritizing safety. It’s a a major need and our front office has come out and pointed it out as such. Don’t be surprised if we sign a FA and draft someone or draft two, this is a great safety class. I would be shocked if Starks fell to the second, but he would fit Everos defense to a tee.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, shaq said:

This is actually an amazing draft, not sure why people are complaining about us prioritizing safety. It’s a a major need and our front office has come out and pointed it out as such. Don’t be surprised if we sign a FA and draft someone or draft two, this is a great safety class. I would be shocked if Starks fell to the second, but he would fit Everos defense to a tee.

Landing WR1/WR2 + S1 in the first rounds alone make this draft a steal. Peebles + Phillips makes the DL better, Bowman provides extra LB depth + possible ST contributions, and Wells Jr on day 3? That's a haul of talent, even if it's missing an edge rusher.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Icege said:

Landing WR1/WR2 + S1 in the first rounds alone make this draft a steal. Peebles + Phillips makes the DL better, Bowman provides extra LB depth + possible ST contributions, and Wells Jr on day 3? That's a haul of talent, even if it's missing an edge rusher.

Could not have said it better myself, basically all of these picks are considered steals in terms of current draft projections. Kobe King is a real Mike LB, 6’1 245 he is thick. Been around him in person a lot he is a really nice guy, and he is one of those guys where he is an absolute unit. He will definitely rise predraft, would love to see him as a Panther.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I gave you a full breakdown and examples from last year as to why I think it's unfair to expect 1k from T-Mac this year if everyone stays healthy. But the TLDR version is we will have 4 legitimately good WRs next year, most rookies who get to 1,000 yards don't have any others on the team with them let alone 3 others, it will be hard for him to put up 1k with out the others being injured or falling short of expectations themselves, but in 2026 without Thielen it's different.
    • Ulcerative Colitis is not CTE. 
    • Last year Thielen had 615 yards in 10 games (had more ypg than his 1k season in 23).  XL had 497 in 16 games with tons of drops and Coker had 478 in 11. They also only had only 192 of our 518 targets to get those numbers. So if Thielen has 1,000 yards again, XL and Coker each improve to say 600 yards each, and T-Mac comes in at 800 yards, you're going to say that's not good enough?  Especially if he ends up with close to, if not getting to, double digit TD's like I think he will, as he's going to be a red zone monster for Bryce? Because if that's the breakdown of just the Top 4 and Bryce plays all 17 games, he's going to be pushing a 4,000 yard season as the TEs, RBs, and other WRs will probably add up to 750-1k yards as well, and I think that would be far more than anyone here could be expecting of him this season. Last year the Giants only had 2 players with more than 331 yards besides Nabers and they were 699 and 573 while Nabers "only" had 1,200 yards (granted in 15 games).  While the Jags second leading receiving was a TE with 411 yards and BTJ also "only" had 1,282 but in all 17 games. If everyone stays healthy and XL/Coker have improved, I think Bryce is going to spread the ball around rather than focus on T-Mac in a way that most of the 1k rookies have been able to get. Again I point to MHJ and the Cardinals last year. They had 3,859 yards receiving.   McBride had 1,146, MHJ had 885, then their 3rd and 4th in rec yards were 548 and 414. Take the 146 and 85 that McBride/MHJ had over my example for our guys and give them to the other two and they get to 7 yards shy of the 600 I'm using for XL/Coker, while the rest of the team added up to 866 yards. So, if you expect T-Mac to get to 1k, where are you taking those yards from? if anything, XL and Coker each getting 600 yards seems like a low projection, so they wouldn't come from there. Maybe they come from Thielen now that we have T-Mac as the true #1.  But I think if anything, having T-Mac draw attention will just make it easier for Thielen to get open and him and Bryce have great chemistry already, he's not going to stop throwing his way if he can pick up easy chunks of yards there. So maybe they come from the RBs, TEs, other WRs, but it's I think a very fair example to show why expecting 1,000 yards if everyone stays healthy isn't necessarily fair to him. It's also why I said I'd then expect at least 1,200 yards in 2026, as once Thielen leave and all 3 of T-Mac/XL/Coker get better, they absorb that 1,000 yards Thielen leaves behind with T-Mac probably taking close to half of it and the other two splitting up the other half.
×
×
  • Create New...