Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

No nice toys

SmittysLawnGuy

By SmittysLawnGuy,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

SmittysLawnGuy Veteran

SmittysLawnGuy

Posted
Posted

We need almost any trade back. (Even in a slight loss) All of our guys will be gone. Graham, Carter, Hunter. It's a crap shoot after that, Id say Pierce but he's an ahole. Green, but that's probably the color of his member. Walker, T rex that can't workout. Tet hides cause he's slow. Stewart, 1 sack per year. If we can't trade back uggh! At that point I'd take either of these 4. And forget your Kiper boards Give me Walter Nolan (DT), Nick Emanwari?(safety from S.C.), Tyler Warren (TE) or Matthew Golden (WR) Mykel Williams ehh. I give up. It's just us, every pick above us is valuable. We fall into the next 20 guys. It only hurts a lot. Mommy!

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PleaseCutStewart Grand Master

PleaseCutStewart

Posted
Posted
52 minutes ago, SmittysLawnGuy said:

We need almost any trade back. (Even in a slight loss) All of our guys will be gone. Graham, Carter, Hunter. It's a crap shoot after that, Id say Pierce but he's an ahole. Green, but that's probably the color of his member. Walker, T rex that can't workout. Tet hides cause he's slow. Stewart, 1 sack per year. If we can't trade back uggh! At that point I'd take either of these 4. And forget your Kiper boards Give me Walter Nolan (DT), Nick Emanwari?(safety from S.C.), Tyler Warren (TE) or Matthew Golden (WR) Mykel Williams ehh. I give up. It's just us, every pick above us is valuable. We fall into the next 20 guys. It only hurts a lot. Mommy!

While that is nice in theory, I think most teams will want to do the same. So the problem becomes that nobody wants to trade up and if they do, it's a buyer's market so they won't offer close to value. I highly doubt we are trading back unless some team in the Early - mid 10s sends us a really good offer

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, WarPanthers89 said:

I disagree. Not many blue chip players in this draft and one will be available at #8 no matter what. We need so many players that we need to take BPA. I’m all for trading down with any other pick but no way I would trade #8

The pool of obvious elite players is extremely, extremely small. Likely all of them will be gone at 8.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Waldo Grand Master

Waldo

Posted
Posted

In drafts like this there are so few wow players that the media will have to overhype up guys to fill the time. It's plausible someone falls in love and makes a move. Not every team has needs as gigantic as the Panthers. It's not a lock for sure but given what's likely to be available # 8 it's what I am hoping for as it stands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TD alt Grand Master

TD alt

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, chknwing said:

If a QB is there, we can get a decent haul

Jaxson Dart, Tyler Shough, Quinn Ewers, Brady Cook, Will Howard...?Cam Ward and Shedeur Sanders aren't necessarily locks to go before us either--they probably will, but there will be some surprises.

A blue chip player, or especially a trade back is still very much a possibility.

Edited by TD alt
Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, TD alt said:

Jaxson Dart, Tyler Shough, Quinn Ewers, Brady Cook, Will Howard...?Cam Ward and Shedeur Sanders aren't necessarily locks to go before us either--they probably will, but there will be some surprises.

A blue chip player, or especially a trade back is still very much a possibility.

Yeah, this is pretty universally acknowledged as a very, very weak QB draft. I don't think we get a QB bump unless Sanders or Ward slides but that is also a scenario where the NFL's most QB desperate teams are passing on them, which is a bad sign for value to trade up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CPcavedweller Grand Master

CPcavedweller

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, SmittysLawnGuy said:

We need almost any trade back. (Even in a slight loss) All of our guys will be gone. Graham, Carter, Hunter. It's a crap shoot after that, Id say Pierce but he's an ahole. Green, but that's probably the color of his member. Walker, T rex that can't workout. Tet hides cause he's slow. Stewart, 1 sack per year. If we can't trade back uggh! At that point I'd take either of these 4. And forget your Kiper boards Give me Walter Nolan (DT), Nick Emanwari?(safety from S.C.), Tyler Warren (TE) or Matthew Golden (WR) Mykel Williams ehh. I give up. It's just us, every pick above us is valuable. We fall into the next 20 guys. It only hurts a lot. Mommy!

I would like Warren early, defense next three picks, then Cam Skattebo in the 3rd or 4th round. You can’t teach elite grit. You can’t teach elite everything which Warren has. 
 

warren and Sanders would almost definitely provide the duo teams have been reaching for with tight ends since the Gronk Hernandez days. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TD alt Grand Master

TD alt

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah, this is pretty universally acknowledged as a very, very weak QB draft. I don't think we get a QB bump unless Sanders or Ward slides but that is also a scenario where the NFL's most QB desperate teams are passing on them, which is a bad sign for value to trade up.

True true, but one man's trash is another's gold. If there's a surprise or micro slide, some GM is going to be chomping at the bit to exploit their newfound opportunity. Moreover, somewhere within their minds will be Michael Penix Jr. and Bo Nix. Someone's gonna call Dan, but will what they're offering get him to move? That will be the question. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Saca312
      In addition to Evero there's one large change that likely should happen.

      By Saca312 · Posted

      It's honestly pretty interesting just seeing this pairing play out. Canales’ offenses (Seattle, Tampa) are run-first, under-center, play-action systems built around defined reads and intermediate/deep timing throws. That structure worked when he had QBs like Baker Mayfield or Russell Wilson in a system that created clear launch points and sightlines. His success has always been tied to a credible run game + play-action gravity. You can see that with the Panthers team building philosophy as well. Coker and TMac both are bigger receivers that won't get the best YAC production but thrive as possession receivers in contested scenarios. They're not the best in space and creating additional yardage in such, and would likely fair better systematically with a stronger armed QB who can create better opportunities on those boundary 1v1 matchups with stronger throws. Bryce, on the other hand, is a spread-native QB. His strengths are rhythm, spacing, quick processing, and off-script creation. Asking him to live in condensed formations with long-developing play-action concepts just hasn't been his forte. And well, his boundary throws are limited in velocity which takes a big chunk of the playbook off. And I mean a QB like Bryce can still work, it's just Dave's offensive philosophy and foundation is very much at odds with Young's physical limits and his own experience. So it's certainly still a learning experience for Dave to figure out how he can mesh his offensive philosophy with Young's strengths. He's very inexperienced with maximizing Bryce's strengths with his system. Would love to see us bring in an OC with spread experience and adaptability to implement a cohesive system with Dave to allow Bryce to thrive, as it's obvious we're sticking with him for a bit longer.   
    • Puresteel55
      Carolina Panthers pick No. 19-2026 NFL Draft

      By Puresteel55 · Posted

      Bryce Boetcher
    • TylerDurden
      CBS Sports brief discussion about questionable Canales decision making

      By TylerDurden · Posted

      Only thing I really agreed with is questioning why we didn’t take any timeouts on their last drive.  I know hindsight is 20/20, but I think it would’ve saved clock bc they were desperate to score as soon as the opportunity presented itself, but I also think it could’ve helped the defense regroup and maybe give us a better chance to stop them.
×
×
  • Create New...