Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tershawn Wharton to sign with Panthers


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

This is the type of guy that scares me. Undersized and was basically a low level rotational guy until finally showing up in a contract year. Hopefully he was just a late bloomer but he looks like the prototype FA bust.

Or you could look at it as player devolment for an Undrafted rookie free agent 🙄

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, PantherChris said:

I'd rather pay for future production with 25 year olds than past production 

Cool. Just Hella risky. That's all. Hella risky. A lot of guys catch lightening in a bottle for one season and NEVER get close to that kind of production again. Never.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get the apprehensive approach from some people but these guys we are signing along the DL are all young with their best years ahead of them. I like that we're investing in the trenches.

One thing for sure. Evero won't have any excuses this year. He's getting plenty of help.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

feels like a jalan walker/tet type draft

OR, Mykel Williams, Starks/or the kid from SC. If no qbs go in the top 10, which is looking more like a possibility each passing day, there could be a run on defense at the top. Those qb needy teams may wait until round 2 to take a chance on one of these qb's. 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, frankw said:

I get the apprehensive approach from some people but these guys we are signing along the DL are all young with their best years ahead of them. I like that we're investing in the trenches.

One thing for sure. Evero won't have any excuses this year. He's getting plenty of help.

seems like a more prudent approach than paying DK 30 million per.  But fug man I hope this doesnt screw up our cap situation, we were so fuging close to having some actual breathing room with no poo deals.  But if a couple of these guys get sideways we have a lot of money on the books

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
×
×
  • Create New...