Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Any interest in Kyle Juszczyk?


kungfoodude
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Jackofalltrades said:

While I'd love to get back to a power run scheme and I'm 100% supportive of having a lead blocking FB, I don't think he'd be the guy with his age. 5 years ago? Absolutely!

One or two year contract. Brooks won't be available in 2025. Why draft another RB when we could use the draft capital on other needs. I wouldn't mind with a decent contract. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, grimesgoat said:

I'd rather draft Warren.  He can play TE, FB, and Wildcat QB.

I feel like re-signing Tommy Tremble kind of signals that we're not seriously considering Warren at #8.

Not that his ceiling isn't FAR higher than either Tremble or Sanders, but we don't need all three of them.

Had they let Tremble walk I'd be more convinced that Warren is on our radar as Sanders could pretty seamlessly move into the TE2 role, but Tremble's contract screams "TE2!" and I don't see them giving up on Sanders after one fairly promising year.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SetfreexX said:

Lol at best receiver at TE, or RB....

He catches dump offs and the occasional wheel, or depth completion off misdirection.

Age 33, no real YAC potential...I'm good.

But he does actually catch them. That's the problem with a lot of our TE's currently(minus maybe Sanders).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CPcavedweller said:

Honestly, the style of game that Bryce plays, I could see Kyle being a huge benefit. Having a true H-Back that can stay in and block, catch, and run at times? At this point, I'm all for going more physical on offense, as I was under Wilks and in hoping we would retain him. 

I think getting Kyle, drafting Skattebo and Tyler Warren, and picking up a shifty receiver to learn under and around Adam, would be all this offense is missing.

I'd also like Mekhi Becton. I don't want him to start. I just want him as an extra tight end in goal line situations with Tyler Warren and Cam Skattebo lined up in the backfield to take either the tush push or to do a sort of wild cat play. You could also have Kyle back there because he can both block and catch. 

That would be a nearly unstoppable force within 5 yards of the goal line, every time. 

Becton is too expensive for what you are talking about, however. He has too many starting opportunities in the league.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Jay Roosevelt said:

I'm not sure we even have use for a traditional fullback in our offense. Did we even have one on the roster last year?

I feel like Tremble can be that guy if needed.

Tremble needs to become this if he wants to stay in the NFL. Honestly he could be great in this role. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

Becton is too expensive for what you are talking about, however. He has too many starting opportunities in the league.

This was his first season playing where he was healthy. I have never seen anyone be given more chances to get healthy than this guy. I don't know what contract he will get, but someone will be gambling that he will be available.

If he could be had for back-up guard money, I'd go for him quickly, and use him situationally as an extra tight end. If he can't be, that's fine. In my fantasy scenario, we have completely remade our offense under a new and improved Bryce with an Offensive Coordinator (Canales) who finally figured out how to run the offense later in the year. 

I can dream. And all of my dreams have been wrong. We will not get Warren, Skattebo, or Becton, and all three will be major contributors wherever they go. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure why the hate on Tremble. He's a very athletic TE that has an old school mentality. Loves to mix it up and plays tough. And that mofo is constantly looking to hurdle someone. He's my kind of crazy. Just needs to keep developing as a route runner and catching the dang ball in heavy traffic. And he's still very young. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, CPcavedweller said:

This was his first season playing where he was healthy. I have never seen anyone be given more chances to get healthy than this guy. I don't know what contract he will get, but someone will be gambling that he will be available.

If he could be had for back-up guard money, I'd go for him quickly, and use him situationally as an extra tight end. If he can't be, that's fine. In my fantasy scenario, we have completely remade our offense under a new and improved Bryce with an Offensive Coordinator (Canales) who finally figured out how to run the offense later in the year. 

I can dream. And all of my dreams have been wrong. We will not get Warren, Skattebo, or Becton, and all three will be major contributors wherever they go. 

Yeah, I think his success at OG will put him well out of that range. But, you are also talking about using him in a way we could likely get a versatile backup in the draft and do similar. Maybe not be the pure freak Becton is but at a reasonable price.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Navy_football said:

Not sure why the hate on Tremble. He's a very athletic TE that has an old school mentality. Loves to mix it up and plays tough. And that mofo is constantly looking to hurdle someone. He's my kind of crazy. Just needs to keep developing as a route runner and catching the dang ball in heavy traffic. And he's still very young. 

I don't think it's hate. I didn't agree with the size of the deal was the main issue I had. We paid him like he is a pretty good TE, which is a very much not. He is basically a blocking TE, which are a dime a dozen in the NFL.

Yes, certainly if he develops into a pass catching threat the deal looks great but it's been three seasons without much in the way of development there. 

I think he just is who he is, an athletic blocking TE.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...