Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers agree to 1-year deal with RB Rico Dowdle


UNCrules2187
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

and thats pretty fuging stupid, this rb draft class is absolutely loaded and to get one on a cheap 4 year deal is gold, its like Morgan is doubling down on his stupidity and not taking the L in brooks

Why take an L when he could still he a good player

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

ive been complimentary of morgan and these signings for the past 2 days not sure what you are talking about.  This is simply not a good signing

It's 1 year, $3m incentive laden deal for a pretty decent vet back. Not sure why you think it's so bad. Doesn't preclude getting a mid-round RB, but clearly they want some experience behind Chubba given Brooks injury, Miles being cut, and likely not retaining Blackshear.

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, uncfan888 said:

Rico Dowdle from Week 12 on last year:

 

🔵 677 rushing yards (4th)

⚫️ 498 yards after contact (1st)

🔵 27 missed tackles forced (6th)

⚫️ 17 explosive runs (5th)

 

I'll take it for 3 mil

Contract isn't bad at just $3 mil. Still, a rookie RB contract is cheaper and can potentially get a far better player

 

Edited by kungfoodude
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

and thats pretty fuging stupid, this rb draft class is absolutely loaded and to get one on a cheap 4 year deal is gold, its like Morgan is doubling down on his stupidity and not taking the L in brooks

 

broooooo, please rethink without the Morgan/Panthers dislike. 

Like with Michael Jackson and Christ, I believe its a great signing.

I spend enough hate in the Wharton and that's without blasting paying top billing to a fuging safety. 

There's room for all Dans move, good and bad.

This is winner in my book.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, jfra78 said:

No need to draft a rb now just pick up a udfa 

What? This is the best RB class in a long time. If we let Dowdle on a 1 year deal  stop us from selecting a RB, we really are the worst drafting team out there. We have a lot of day 3 picks and there is no doubt there will be several RBs as BPA for a few of those.

Personally, I feel like we are throwing money away. That $6M covers a 4th/5th round RB’s 4 year rookie deal. I’d rather have Hubbard, Brooks and a 2025 rookies as our RB corps.

It just seems silly that we’re going to be paying our RBs $17M in 2025 and we won’t have our RB of the future playing at all.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Basically agree.  He is the one of that bunch that offers upgraded pass catching along with he is supposed to be kind of special.   Then you have the OL and the ideas that if they perform you can have JAG backs and still do well. So okay we could be fine.  But Brooks is important and to me that receiving element sets him apart.  So there sure is something riding on him.     What strikes me as incongruent is people over in Atlanta or those that follow them look at Penix with a third surgery and act like it is no big deal.      And we are on pins and needles over Brooks.  Either they should worry a lot more or we should worry a lot less.  
    • I usually go a game or two optimist over the consensus here but this is too early for me to say. I need to see some players on the field.  I am not feeling real optimistic though.  
    • Okay as a ‘take CJ’ fan I actually don’t obsess over CJ and Houston, contrary to the narrative.  But I thought I picked up some noise that his OL left a lot to be desired.    Not a single Beyce supporter would judge him harshly if he had a crappy OL. We all know that.    So be fair about it.  A QB needs to be protected.  Especially a guy that gets to his spot and wants to finish the play from there. Which CJ is.  
×
×
  • Create New...