Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What is the probability...


Zod

Recommended Posts

Historically less than 50%. around 40% chance for the last 15 years

http://www.nfl.com/draft/history/fulldraft?type=position

Based on that i would say

2007 - Kolb 2nd or Edwards 3rd

2002 - Garrard 4th

2001 - If you take Brees (32nd pick) over Vick (1st)

2000 - Brady 6th

1997 - Jake Plummer

1996 - No QB taken

However many of those years (2001, 2000, 1997, 1996) only had 0 or 1 QB in the first.

Given 4 possible QBs in the top 10 I would put the probability at 10-20%

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we'll have people on here calling a trouble free cam newton a thug and screaming that mobile QBs don't work while newton has taken the bills to the playoffs 3 times.

meanwhile we'll be looking at the falcons, bucs, and saints from below still convinced that you don't need to have a great QB to be a good team and making excuses for the "bargain" we tried to find in the 4th round.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am high, but that’s besides the point! The blue line is not good right now. I’ve said it all year. I don’t think this group meshes well. Slaven has been just OK Niki up and down Miller up and down ghost and Walker have been your most consistent guys. Maybe it comes together more towards the playoffs
    • I was expecting to see more cap room moves by now, which may be to suggest that we are not going to be that aggressive.  I have mixed emotions about that (because I think we have 3 needs on D and 3 needs on O--starters).  If you look to the draft for 3 starters, that is ambitious.  We need 6
    • Yeah we shouldn’t be competing with teams, bidding wise, to sign a WR. There will be one for us and our budget.  I keep saying, how many balls will there be to go around anyway? One thing good I will say for this offense is the ball has been spread around at times. Seems like I remember seeing a large number of guys have caught passes in a game. Or been targeted at least. 3 RBs 4 or 5 WRs 2-3 TEs type of stat lines. 10-11 guys.  Not every week but that happens.    As far as WR in general, we need the smaller agile and quicker component to compliment what is there. After that it should be about depth, having good backups for the starters so we can run things consistently still, if a guy is out for a week or two. That is especially important in game where you have to finish the game with who you made active. 
×
×
  • Create New...