Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Pre-Draft thoughts from Diana Russini


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Final words of wisdom: As you are getting ready to watch the draft and feel good about what your team is going to do based on need and options, I’ll share with you what a Super Bowl-winning coach once told me: “Don’t ever discount that there are dumbass teams.”

Best advice ever in sports.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 3
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I started watching this and I'm about half done. He starts at the beginning of the concepts and keeps building upon it. I almost walked but then he kept expanding. I can't tell where he is going yet but it's well done to the half way point. 

  • Pie 4
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Marshall’s Mike Green are in play for Atlanta.

I really don't want Green going to one of our division rivals, he may be the best of the bunch when it's all said and done, his previous off the field issues and not being on a better program are the only reasons he isn't discussed more in the top 10 

Edited by NAS
  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't really understand the knock on sanders being sacked a ton.  When it happens in the NFL it's get the qb a better oline not he can't play.  I think most of sanders sacks were his line being below average more so than him not seeing the field well.  I'd take sanders over ward

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, toldozer said:

I don't really understand the knock on sanders being sacked a ton.  When it happens in the NFL it's get the qb a better oline not he can't play.  I think most of sanders sacks were his line being below average more so than him not seeing the field well.  I'd take sanders over ward

It has to do with their style...

The quarterbacks who get sacked the least are the Marino / Brady / Brees types who make quick reads and get rid of the ball fast.

Likewise, if you have someone who's trying to play "hero ball" and make a big play every time, that style doesn't translate well to the NFL. 

Pretty sure Sanders has been criticized more than once for holding on to the ball too long.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Manna said:

that might even be an upgrade for us =/ 

Considering we've had a regime the last several years who felt it was prudent to assembling a winning roster to look over the bottom of dumbass teams rosters for talent like the Jaguars and the Jets and send them assets for their rejects well... sadly yeah. In the current term we've at least moved on from that foolishness so I guess that's a plus.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, frankw said:

Considering we've had a regime the last several years who felt it was prudent to assembling a winning roster to look over the bottom of dumbass teams rosters for talent like the Jaguars and the Jets and send them assets for their rejects well... sadly yeah. In the current term we've at least moved on from that foolishness so I guess that's a plus.

I just can't put stock into Morgan until after I see what we do this draft. I am making no assumptions and have tampered expectations until I see real change.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, TD alt said:

I just can't put stock into Morgan until after I see what we do this draft. I am making no assumptions and have tampered expectations until I see real change.

Buffalo literally follows the Carolina model. It works for them because of their stability and their drafts have hit. 

They also play in a garbage division.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yes, but those guys aren't depth guard signings, they're likely going to wait and see who has injuries or players under performing and then sign there. I also think that if Ickey really is going to be able to play at some point this year, that's where our guard depth comes from.  As if he gets to the point of being active, we'd then have 3 LT's on the roster with him, Freeling, and Walker, gotta think one of them not named Freeling gets kicked inside if needed.
    • lol imagine being Hill and this is what your coach thinks about you replacing a guy giving up over 4 goals per game.
    • I don't think Tyreek is a bad player to play with on the field, for sure not in the same way that Diggs is, as he's a cancer on the field with how he acts, and wouldn't take kindly to being 2nd fiddle behind T-Mac. It's that Tyreek is just a terrible person who realistically shouldn't even be in the NFL, his insane athletic ability is why his off field transgressions have been overlooked.  If he was a WR3, no team would have kept him around, it was only that he was a 1st ballot HOF level talent that kept him around. Just zero interest in having a person like that around our young WRs, that's really all it comes down to for me with him. Again, if we were true contenders this year, that changes things and I'd rather bring in the best possible players and hope it works out.  But they're trying to build something here and to do that, you need high quality people, not just great talent.
×
×
  • Create New...