Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2025 NFL Draft - Day 3 Discussion


Bear Hands
 Share

Recommended Posts

Final Day is here!

82672664007-2152363369-2.jpg?crop=4465,2

Recap so far:

1-8 Tetairoa McMillan WR Arizona

2-51 Nic Scourton OLB/DE Texas A&M

3-77 Princely Umanmielen OLB Ole Miss

--

We've still got 5 picks left after two trade ups, no future picks mortgaged:

4-114 (Pick 12)

4-122 (Pick 20)

5-140 (Pick 2)

5-163 (Pick 27)

6-208 (Pick 32)

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, jfra78 said:

Dt, safety and ILB.  Also i wouldn't be surprised if they don't pick a safety today

If talent is equal i'd be leaning ILB first personally. All the beat guys like Bowman at S but I've seen him listed 5'9", major knock is missed tackles which I'm sure most on this board are sick of already. 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jackie Lee said:

If talent is equal i'd be leaning ILB first personally. All the beat guys like Bowman at S but I've seen him listed 5'9", major knock is missed tackles which I'm sure most on this board are sick of already. 

 

Yea i really like Chris Paul if he's there after that Stutsman

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, frankw said:

This is where I really need to see some improvement. We've gotta find some gems in these mid rounds. Really no need to trade up just let the chips fall.

We really do need all 5 shots at finding some 53 man roster guys lol. Defensive depth is horrid

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Deone walker... get another huge plug for the Nose instead of Shy Tuttle.  Riley Leonard or Donovan Smith as project qbs.  A running back like Cam. I wouldnt reach to get any safety left, at this point they won't start. Get  a vet or 2 safety, continue to develop Richardson. Get a vet tight end.  Possible return specialist. 

Edited by Lurk21
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...