Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

MLB Devin Lloyd for WR Jalen Coker??


Basbear
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, TD alt said:

Did I say that? Try again. In fact, I said the exact opposite in several respects.

I don't run a football team, and I wouldn't presume to know what the ball boy knows, much less Eric Eager (for example). I can only know so much. 

I may question someone's opinion within the context of giving my own, but clowning people and personal insults are not my go-to style. Now, as some have learned over the more than last couple of decades, I can and will get stupid with people who get stupid with me.

 

 

 

All of this bullshit over a hypothetical pursuit of a LB on the 31st ranked defense in the league and a fundamental misunderstanding of PFF and link after link proving I was right.

Awesome.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

It doesn't work for us.

Which angle? 

It would add around 1.5mill to the cap and Panthers get a top 15 PFF LB to lead the defense for the 2025 season?

Chemistry wise, I don't know if Coker is liked or hated or loner or ______ . I just see hes got a few players in front of him.

 

I think that's the biggest take-away, well besides all the cokeheads being too scared to call his stats or if he's active. Huddle has Coker rated as a ring of honor, I like him and all, but not that high......

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Basbear said:

 

Wow, thanks for answering the question! The other cokeheads are scare or unsure, they don't even know if he will be active or scare to post his projection 2025 stats.

 

You for sure have a open mind about this, I knew the reason before I posted it. Psssssst but don't tell the other cokeheads, he was nursing a injury is what I heard.

 

Ill drop this from the list, no biggie!

I really feel sorry for your lack.of communication skills.  

I'm not scared.  You're acting like a damn joke right now. Certainly nothing to ever be scared of. 

Like Linville has said, we dont know Cokers role in this season's offense.   We know he thrived last season. 

The jags aren't going to ask for Coker,  and the Panthers aren't going to call the Jags.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, pantherclaw said:

I really feel sorry for your lack.of communication skills.  

I'm not scared.  You're acting like a damn joke right now. Certainly nothing to ever be scared of. 

Like Linville has said, we dont know Cokers role in this season's offense.   We know he thrived last season. 

The jags aren't going to ask for Coker,  and the Panthers aren't going to call the Jags.

 

You gave me the keys- You cokeheads don't know his role. That's the the whole kit and caboodle, I know lloyd and his top 15 rating would be leading the Panthers defense while cokeheads don't know his role! 

 

Uu0bPP9.gif.633fd385c08b98f0b79fc2117429d187.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Basbear said:

 

You gave me the keys- You cokeheads don't know his role. That's the the whole kit and caboodle, I know lloyd and his top 15 rating would be leading the Panthers defense while cokeheads don't know his role! 

 

Uu0bPP9.gif.633fd385c08b98f0b79fc2117429d187.gif

Yeah, you know......

 

Whatever you say sweetcakes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

could we use a Devin Lloyd type? probably. 

does Coker really have anything to do with that type hypothetical? I don't see.  I think most teams generally have their own version of Coker (which doesn't make him relevant in terms of player acquisition IMO. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CRA said:

could we use a Devin Lloyd type? probably. 

does Coker really have anything to do with that type hypothetical? I don't see.  I think most teams generally have their own version of Coker (which doesn't make him relevant in terms of player acquisition IMO. 

I think Coker's value is only so high to the Panthers. He had good production for a udfa and he has some favorable advanced stats, but the reality is he had limited production. I love the guy and personally think at worst He's very solid depth... but... He's not getting traded straight up for a starter right now. 

As an aside... What's with this cokehead stuff?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, XClown1986 said:

Why does this have 11 pages?

I was going to say how I can't believe that this thread has 11 pages lol

5 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

I think Coker's value is only so high to the Panthers. He had good production for a udfa and he has some favorable advanced stats, but the reality is he had limited production. I love the guy and personally think at worst He's very solid depth... but... He's not getting traded straight up for a starter right now. 

As an aside... What's with this cokehead stuff?

He thinks it's funnier than it is. I got the play on words and it's cute if you use it once but repeating it over and over takes that away and feels like he's trying to be insulting.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, flagfootballcoach28 said:

I thought the same thing. Somehow i missed this thread and the whole idea of trading an up and coming young WR for a LB with an expiring contract is silly. 

Basically it's 11 pages because two people can't accept this and have concluded that means that everyone else is stupid.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

idk if this would make sense for the Jags. BTJ is their #1, they traded up for Travis Hunter, and Dyami Brown is on a 1yr deal after showing promise in Washington (as well as Jags training camp).

Coker would likely compete with Joshua Cephus for WR4. Doesn't seem like a very good transaction for them.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would be happy with Lomu or Iheanachor at 19. Fano is intriguing but I don't think he makes it.
    • II see it this way: We have to look at long-term needs and current depth.  We have filled some key spots with players on one-year contracts.  I firmly believe that they intend to pay Bryce some big bucks next year.  That means you cannot hope that your rookies in 2027 can fill the spots vacated by the veterans you could not afford to re-sign.   We need to consider the cap and the fact that the need to start a rookie is not viewed as a positive by coaches and general managers, but they value first contracts--so it is a delicate balance. I think they have to look at the cap by position--"Can we afford a $50m QB and a $100m OL?  That is half the cap, before you pay your WRs and RBs and TEs.  They need to start getting younger on the OL as well.   I am not suggesting that we draft OT in round 1, but we could and I would get it.  RT on a 1-year deal, they may have intel about Ickey (who was not the best LT, to be honest) and 32-year old Moton is on a bad wheel.   Now if you go by Morgan's history, you can almost tell what position we are going to address with the first pick by noting the positions he has not focused on in free agency.  DT, considering the lack of performance by those not named Derrick Brown and the loss of Robinson, is screaming to be addressed with a top player.  Wharton is not an early down DT (DE if you want to get technical) and our LBs need to be clean--they were not in 2025.  Look for a DT early. I also think we will address ILB (pass covering Will) on day 2.  The other day 2 pick will be an OT, in my view. Do not rule out CB.  We are thin there too, and Jackson is in his final year.  I am not sure that we love Smith-Wade.  Some crackhead on here talked about moving him to S----stay tuned.   Hopefully, a team wanting Ty Simpson will move up and offer us a pick or two to move back. DT WILB OT OC QB  (you heard it here 337th--but this pick could come sooner than you think.      
    • Bryce had some bad games, but he had some good ones as well (and this is coming from a Bryce skeptic). I think it's a little simplistic to put all the offensive woes on Bryce, you also should be looking at O-line play, receiver play, RB and TE play, and also coaching. There's no way when I look at the offense in it's totality am I ready to say that a so-so to bad offense was all on Bryce, and, I also can't say that we don't need to upgrade any position on offense, save Tetairoa McMillan (who also wasn't perfect) and maybe the starting guards and T-mo.
×
×
  • Create New...