Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Scott Fowler on game


raleigh-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, PantherChris said:

That's just from memory bub, and considering how awful we have been for 7 years that aren't memorable in any way...  its basically 5 years lol. In 2015 people were melting down about the offensive line swearing cam would be on IR by week 5. 

 

And I completely agree, the saying is Rome wasn't built in a day and all. 

 

Like I've said my expectations for this year aren't grandiose or crazy with homerism I want a watchable/entertaining offense....

If our defense could get up to about #22 overall I would be extatic.... I have zero expectations on that side of the ball. 

3-1 in our warm up games in 2015 by the way.   But it’s all “recency bias”. 

Dating back to 2003 (which is as far back as ESPN goes)…..Panthers have never had a winning season paired with a bad preseason (losing preseason) 

Every winning season paired with a .500 or better preseason since 03

and I think the only winning preseason paired with losing season was 04 when 89 broke his leg week 1. 

maybe there is a game I missed somewhere.  But that’s not recency bias.  It’s just the way it has been in Carolina since 2003.   Could it just be a coincidence? Sure.  As I don’t really care about wins in a preseason.  But it is a consistent trend in Carolina that results in a random fact 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone has done a pretty in depth analysis on reddit

https://www.reddit.com/r/nfl/s/cLRbUjn68k

Spoiler alert, there is no correlation between preseason performance and regular season performances. From the Rams going 0-3 and winning the Super Bowl to the Browns and Lions going winless after going 4-0. 
 

Fans want to bring up a correlation specifically with our team and ignore how it has none on the whole NFL. You are looking at different staffs and rosters over the years as well so any correlation would just be a coincidence. 
 

From the Reddit post

“In conclusion, the preseason is many things. A battle for roster spots, a reprieve for NFL fans starving for games, a chance to see your team’s draft picks in action. But one thing it is definitely not is a crystal ball for the future of a team at large. Enjoy the preseason for what it is, but take it with a grain of salt, especially if your team doesn’t give its main QB any preseason snaps. The only fair conclusion might be that if your stating QB plays in the preseason and you have a double-digit point deficit, that may not be a good sign for postseason hopes. This may be statistical noise however, as we’ve only had one year of a three-week preseason, and thus a small sample size to draw from.”

Edited by ForJimmy
  • Pie 3
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the end of the day you can draw conclusions to fit your narrative and pulling numbers from other teams to try and prop up the franchise with the worst win percentage in professional sports under the Tepper's is no different.

The fact of the matter is this franchise has been putting out a mediocre to terrible product for a long time now. Even under Richardson we had a losing season every other year. You can't assign the same benefit of the doubt as you would other franchises (even the Jets and Browns have been at least marginally better than us as of late) unless you are engaging in some level of cope. And if you want to do that hey great for you. Call it what it is though.

Edited by frankw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Castavar said:

All this game showed me was:

1. Starters will be decent

2. We have terrible depth

3. Special teams will be..............special

Oh yeah, and Andy Dalton sucks ass

About depth:

S: I think we have 3/4 that can start.

CB: With Thornton, Horn, Jackson, and Smith Wade, Bartholomew and Evans behind them--we are deep (somehow).

ILB:  No depth.  We need some badly

OLB:  Wonnum, Jones, Scourton, Princely, and maybe a fifth--we are deep.

DE: Brown, Robinson, Wharton---and Ray, who I think sucked last year--maybe we could use one more.

DT:  Brown, Cam Jackson, Shy Tuttle--not bad--Shy better play better

OFFENSE

WR--TMac, XL, AT, Coker, Renfrow, and Horn--good depth

TE--Tremble, Sanders, Evans--not flashy but solid

OL--Christensen, Mays, Zavala--that is pretty good depth.

RB--Chuba, Dowdle, Brooks, Etienne---stable full

QB--Young, Dalton, Plummer---not much depth

So I think we have depth issues at

1. ILB  (personally, Rozeboom is a backup and Wallace is not without flaws)

2. DE  (need a fourth)

3. QB (Hard to find a backup better than Dalton, and that is sad)

Surprisingly, DBs on paper look good.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, frankw said:

Stopped reading after he said another ass whooping didn’t matter.

Yeah it's preseason and these games don't count but getting our asses whooped has been the consistent story more often than not of the Carolina Panthers since at least 2018.

That matters.

Thank you, ... Tired of the same old same old.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, CRA said:

The logic of Bryce looked terrific and then say BUT keep in mind Sanders did what he did vs backups…..is some type of logic 

Lmaoooo...all you can do is laugh at this point. 

Down playing a rookie in his very first game vs a guy in his 3rd season. The logic. 

Edited by CPF4LIFE
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, CPF4LIFE said:

Lmaoooo...all you can do is laugh at this point. 

Down playing a rookie in his very first game vs a guy in his 3rd season. The logic. 

Son, this is a Panthers' forum.

Feel free to go here to be excited about the Browns' new QB.

Edited by Icege
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, frankw said:

At the end of the day you can draw conclusions to fit your narrative and pulling numbers from other teams to try and prop up the franchise with the worst win percentage in professional sports under the Tepper's is no different.

The fact of the matter is this franchise has been putting out a mediocre to terrible product for a long time now. Even under Richardson we had a losing season every other year. You can't assign the same benefit of the doubt as you would other franchises (even the Jets and Browns have been at least marginally better than us as of late) unless you are engaging in some level of cope. And if you want to do that hey great for you. Call it what it is though.

Carrying the water for both Jimmy Haslam and Woody Johnson is wild but go off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

Someone has done a pretty in depth analysis on reddit

https://www.reddit.com/r/nfl/s/cLRbUjn68k

Spoiler alert, there is no correlation between preseason performance and regular season performances. From the Rams going 0-3 and winning the Super Bowl to the Browns and Lions going winless after going 4-0. 
 

Fans want to bring up a correlation specifically with our team and ignore how it has none on the whole NFL. You are looking at different staffs and rosters over the years as well so any correlation would just be a coincidence. 
 

From the Reddit post

“In conclusion, the preseason is many things. A battle for roster spots, a reprieve for NFL fans starving for games, a chance to see your team’s draft picks in action. But one thing it is definitely not is a crystal ball for the future of a team at large. Enjoy the preseason for what it is, but take it with a grain of salt, especially if your team doesn’t give its main QB any preseason snaps. The only fair conclusion might be that if your stating QB plays in the preseason and you have a double-digit point deficit, that may not be a good sign for postseason hopes. This may be statistical noise however, as we’ve only had one year of a three-week preseason, and thus a small sample size to draw from.”

The winning and losing is irrelevant. How your players play and team looks is a different thing, IMO.

Especially back in the day, it wasn't uncommon to see starters get whipped for a couple of series but then a turnaround by 2nd or 3rd string units.

Also, it's largely a bunch of vanilla playcalling. These are exercises in player evaluations, nothing more. 

So, there isn't a reason to freak out about getting beat by 30 by the Browns. Now there are ample reasons to be concerned about some of the players and how they performed. The depth being trash, I mean....if you couldn't tell that from just looking at the roster, I don't know what to say. This is very likely the second worst roster in Panthers history, behind the 2024 roster.

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

The winning and losing is irrelevant. How your players play and team looks is a different thing, IMO.

Especially back in the day, it wasn't uncommon to see starters get whipped for a couple of series but then a turnaround by 2nd or 3rd string units.

Also, it's largely a bunch of vanilla playcalling. These are exercises in player evaluations, nothing more. 

So, there isn't a reason to freak out about getting beat by 30 by the Browns. Now there are ample reasons to be concerned about some of the players and how they performed. The depth being trash, I mean....if you couldn't tell that from just looking at the roster, I don't know what to say. This is very likely the second worst roster in Panthers history, behind the 2024 roster.

Player performances would definitely be a good thing to look at. Special teams also lets us know our depth is bad but we all already knew that. I don’t think anyone is expecting us to be great this year. The hope is they can build on how they finished last year and get some more wins. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Player performances would definitely be a good thing to look at. Special teams also lets us know our depth is bad but we all already knew that. I don’t think anyone is expecting us to be great this year. The hope is they can build on how they finished last year and get some more wins. 

Yeah, just show me we finally have some pieces to build with and that's a start. IDC if Canales is the guy or not. We can find coaches if we start gathering talent and show competence.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CPF4LIFE said:

Thanks,  I forgot the forum name excuses making jackass comments. I gotta stay on top of these things. 

It would be fair to classify comments openly cheerleading an opposing player playing well against our camp bodies while ignoring that he played nowhere near as well against the guys who are likely to be on the final roster as "jackass comments".

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Exhibit A of why Woods was cut....   Trying to shoulder knockdown the best WR in the NFL ends up with air   Also not sure what the h*ll coverage Horn was playing but covering nothibg after a poo jam 
    • I'm just telling you what the team is currently looking at. Aho, Jarvis, Staal, KK as the four centers in that order as of right now.  Obviously id prefer them to go get McTavish but the asking price is pretty damn high. 
    • Summary Austin Corbett being named a starter already might be strategic because it allows the team to have Cade Mays compete to play LG if Damien Lewis continues to have shoulder issues going into the season. Brady Christensen is most valuable to the team as the sixth-man/swing tackle for the OL and having him start a game at guard only to have to kick out to tackle (should there be an injury) is less than ideal. Was the weakest link on the OL when he was the starting LG and though he has short arms he is too athletic and so good in space that playing him at tackle is better. RT makes more sense as it's brawn-on-brawn more than it is on the weakside where somebody like Princely Umanmielen can out-athletic him. Cade Mays provides similar versatility that Christensen does, but can stick to the interior while Brady stays on the outside (unless, Lord forbid, there's multiple injuries that requires Mays + Christensen on the interior and Nijman to takeover at OT). Kaye thinks that the only keep two QBs on the roster and while he's seen some of the angst that Andy Dalton caused from the preseason opener but through the first two weeks of training camp he looked like he could be in the conversation if there was a competition for QB1. Not because of any lacking one Bryce's behalf, but just based on the great looks he's given the second-team defense. He's lofted balls into the endzone including a big TD to Coker. Also threw about 45yds through the air to TJ Luther for a TD. Zietlow empathizes with the fans because they can't see anything from training camp. Mike has the team keeping three RBs with Raheem Blackshear as the odd-man out with Etienne set to take over as one of the two returners. Former Ragin' Cajun and Horned Frog Emani Bailey has looked good running the ball in the last couple of practices as well as during the preseason opener. Likely priority practice squad candidate. Thinks that the team should only keep six WRs in order to take an extra OL or DL into the season, but summoning his inner Eric Eager Kaye doesn't see how they justify not keeping seven WRs without a trade. Doesn't think if it's a failure if a trade can't come to fruition to move that seventh WR if they do that. Loves what he's seeing out of McMillan, Coker, and Legette. TMac is starting to surge and Jimmy Horn Jr might be the lead punt returner. With the team being so light on quality special teams players, David Moore might be somebody that they can cut and bring back. All of the WRs further down the roster are also making plays (lists Tremayne, Luther, and George). Alex likes their initial numbers: two QBs, three RBs, and seven WRs. Mike points out that with seven WRs there's no way the team takes four TEs. Will Tremble be healthy and if not who makes the roster while he recovers? James Mitchell has looked good and like it might be him if that's the route. Poses the question of do they take 10 OL? Probably going to have eight active on game day but with DLew's injury, TMo's history, Hunt getting dinged up recently in practice, Corbett's back-to-back season ending injuries creates a legitimate conversation about whether or not they go into the season with ten OL and then try to stash one on the practice squad afterwards. Couple of minutes of debate over the classification of the word hero... Don't have LaBryan Ray, Shy Tuttle, nor Akayleb Evans on their final 53. Quick intermission as they bring on The Houston Chronicle's Jonathan Alexander (formerly of The Charlotte Observer where he was once the Panthers' beat reporter). JA thinks that some of the critique of CJ's game last season was overblown but also understands that folks want to see growth from year one to year two rather than regression but he still had some good moments. Still had a decent TD:INT ratio (20:12) and was listed at #39 in the recent NFL Top 100. Texans were dealing with a lot of injuries early in the summer: Joe Mixon has a foot issue from an off-field injury, Nick Chubb is returning from a season ending injury and recently came back from a concussion as well, Dameon Pierce who is coming back from a quad injury and just recently practiced in full for the first time, Dare Ogunbowale is their do-it-all guy (including emergency kicker), and they drafted Woody Marks out of USC in the 4th round of the 2025 draft. The team might even try to sneak five RBs on to the roster. Chubb isn't a guarantee to make the roster with how much they like Pierce, Dare, and recently invested a 4th in Marks. Talked issues in the secondary after CJGJ's injury and Jimmie Ward's felony assault charge. CJGJ injury was really tough even though he'll come back at some point during the season. Stingley and Lassiter provides them with two lockdown outside CBs. Kaylin Bulock is a ball hawk that struggles in the run game but Jaylen Petri is one of the best hitters/blitzers at the nickel position in the league (though he gives up some in the pass game). They're still going to be strong in the secondary even without CJGJ. DL is one of the best in the league. Will Anderson Jr and Danielle Hunter on the outside with a deeper DT room. DL + secondary are the strongest areas of the defense. Houston WR room has a lot of names that even casual football fans know of (Nico Collins, Christian Kirk, Tank Dell, John Metchie III, Braxton Berrios, both of the Iowa State WRs, etc). Main four are Collins, Kirk, Higgins (Iowa St), and Noel (Iowa St). Open competition for the remaining two to three spots depending on what Berrios has done since coming back from injury. If Berrios is good to go, they could keep seven. John Metchie III, Xavier Hutchinson (a former Iowa St WR himself), and Justin Watson (former Chief) are all competing for those remaining spots with Berrios. Rookie contract guarantees have been getting deeper and deeper every year, so when Higgins was drafted the Texans didn't want to deal with the back-and-forth so they just guaranteed the full deal. Asked about what the external view of Bryce Young is outside of the Carolinas. Jonathan says that the league respects Bryce and the Texans do especially. CJ and him are close, Will Anderson is close with Bryce, Henry Too'too is close with Bryce, Metchie is close with Bryce. Whenever they're asked about him they show nothing but love, including saying that he was going to turn things around in Carolina. Folks around the organization and others outside of Carolina around the league feel like the Panthers didn't put the necessary tools around Bryce in his rookie season. They gave him the tools in his second season, but it was all about his confidence then. They think he's going to be one of the better QBs in the league for a long time. End of Jonathan's segment. Back to just Mike and Alex. Roster bets! Can't be guys that you know are going to be on the roster or win jobs. Outside of the kicker competition there isn't too many positions up in the air. Of the guys in the 45 - 55 range, stake their claim on who they think will make the roster. MK starts with Jaden Crumedy, last year's sixth-round pick. Likes what he's been doing in the run game, feels like he complements DB well. A'Shawn Robinson is complemented by Turk Wharton and Bobby Brown III is complemented by Cam Jackson. AZ points out how Crumedy played in five different defensive schemes in college. AZ goes with Ja'Tyre Carter. He had a solid rest of the game after giving up his initial sack which wasn't exactly egregious. This training camp has shown how important OL depth is and with how much has been invested they're going to want to make sure to keep the strength a strength (especially with three of the five starters already dinged up). Could make the roster as OL10. He's serviceable and part of a group that needs as much depth as possible, so sees the logic in keeping him. MK's next pick... Thomas Incoom. He's been terrific at practice on defense and was solid against the Browns on special teams. Doesn't see why DJ Johnson would be kept over Incoom as the latter is a better pass rusher and a much, much better ST contributor (doesn't hurt that he's outperformed DJ Johnson in every which way). Pointed out a play where DJ Johnson froze up on a reverse when he's supposed to be a good run defender. They've put a lot in and while Evero was pro-DJ Johnson, he was ultimately a selection of the previous regime. Pointed out Brandt Tillis' comments about not cutting Turk Wharton because it would lose the team trying to stash him rather than fielding the best 53 players. Morgan + Tillis don't benefit from storing a player that they didn't draft, and Incoom brings so much on special teams while also providing a pass rush despite needing to improve against the run. AZ's pick... Nick Scott. Both agree that he's a special teamer and a back-up, but Scott also brings a legitimate leadership quality to the team that's well-liked by everybody. Both agree that Ransom and Richardson deserve reps over Nick Scott, but he provides a great locker room presence that benefits the team. If he can be the defense's version of David Moore then he provides even more value than he does as a starter. Ransom has been one of the best defensive players in camp and Richardson showed that he is a very capable defensive player at safety. End.
×
×
  • Create New...