Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Thursday joint practice tweets (@HOU)


Icege
 Share

Recommended Posts

I feel like there is a widespread misconception of WR1, 2, 3, etc.

These are fantasy terms to categorize the production of receivers. They arent concrete positional buckets that players are placed in and limit production. 

Coker would have been considered the last receiver of 7 to make the 53 last season but didn't end that way.

 

 

Edited by csx
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, csx said:

I feel like there is a widespread misconception of WR1, 2, 3, etc.

These are fantasy terms to categorize the production of receivers. They arent concrete positional buckets that players are placed in and limit production. 

The NFL #1 WR has been a mythical beast for years on here. You're pretty much a #2 at best unless you're a future HOFer.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, csx said:

I feel like there is a widespread misconception of WR1, 2, 3, etc.

These are fantasy terms to categorize the production of receivers. They arent concrete positional buckets that players are placed in and limit production. 

Coker would have been considered the last receiver of 7 to make the 53 last season but didn't end that way.

 

 

our WR 1 for a nice stretch was Greg Olsen.  

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, csx said:

No, that would be TE1

I mean, WR1 is generally speaking who your pass game is built around.  And that was Greg Olsen. 

Back in the day the X was normally your best player in the pass game and who the pass game went through.  So often that was the "WR1" position.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, uncfan888 said:

Disappointed Rick And Morty GIF by Adult Swim

Part of me has started prepping for more 42-14 regular season scores. It wasn't the Browns game that did that because it is preseason. But it exposed the lack of depth the Panthers have. Also, the fact the Browns 2nd team managed to get to the Panthers 21, before ultimately winning out on a 4th and 1 where Stefanski went empty with a rookie QB, is concerning. The Browns also should have had a first down their first drive but Diontae dropped a ball and the receiver didn't get enough depth on 2nd down where he caught the ball at the sticks. 

concern level is high. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, CPcavedweller said:

Part of me has started prepping for more 42-14 regular season scores. It wasn't the Browns game that did that because it is preseason. But it exposed the lack of depth the Panthers have. Also, the fact the Browns 2nd team managed to get to the Panthers 21, before ultimately winning out on a 4th and 1 where Stefanski went empty with a rookie QB, is concerning. The Browns also should have had a first down their first drive but Diontae dropped a ball and the receiver didn't get enough depth on 2nd down where he caught the ball at the sticks. 

concern level is high. 

Our line backers are all current or past UDFA’s and we don’t have a pass rush…so yeah.

And we have one good corner than gets hurt a lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...