Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

BREAKiNG NEWS: Panthers interested in trading for Trey Hendrickson


Recommended Posts

24 minutes ago, carpanfan96 said:

The cowboys reportedly just turned down two firsts, a second, and Gary for Parsons. 

ace-attorney-edgeworth.gif.1e74b39cca24fe3c519c278733573444.gif

 

Gary is a great DL guy that can play in any system, he's 27 too. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remember that Khalil Mack was traded for 2 firsts and some change at the end of his rookie deal to the Bears.

The Bears ultimately won the trade as Mack was a continuous PB/AP player and the Raiders squandered all the draft capital on players worth far less. 

It's dumb to turn down that kind of haul, but it's definitely not hard to completely squander.

 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Remember that Khalil Mack was traded for 2 firsts and some change at the end of his rookie deal to the Bears.

The Bears ultimately won the trade as Mack was a continuous PB/AP player and the Raiders squandered all the draft capital on players worth far less. 

It's dumb to turn down that kind of haul, but it's definitely not hard to completely squander.

 

Like we did with the CMC trade

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, WhoKnows said:

And Burns wasn’t Parsons. Shows again how dumb we were.

Not even close!!! BURNS was a one trick pony who had a big game or two a year in the sack collum and was invinsible the rest of the time....

 

Heck hes gonna be the Giants fourth best rusher this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Camp Fodder said:

Like we did with the CMC trade

Oh, 100%. There is no logical reason we shouldn't have won that trade, given what we received in return. But....Fitterermagic prevailed and it was all squandered.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

Remember that Khalil Mack was traded for 2 firsts and some change at the end of his rookie deal to the Bears.

The Bears ultimately won the trade as Mack was a continuous PB/AP player and the Raiders squandered all the draft capital on players worth far less. 

It's dumb to turn down that kind of haul, but it's definitely not hard to completely squander.

 

The Bears may have won the trade, but neither team has much to show for it. 

 

I think Parsons is great, but unless we are one player away from being a SB contender, i avoid that deal like the plague.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

The Bears may have won the trade, but neither team has much to show for it. 

Yeah everybody was so concerned about who would win the trade years down the line.  But what if nobody does, and the only people who remember the trade are Panthers fans, Bears fans, and NFL trivia buffs?  That's most trades.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...