Panthers possibly trading Thielen?

[ProcessBlue2]

Do it. Get something out of it. Either way he is probably done after this season. Maybe we can get some LB or secondary depth out of it. 
 

Renfrow is the same type of player on a less talented level. 
 

Give McMillan, Legette, and Coker the top 3. Gives you a path to also keep Renfrow, Horn, Tremayne, etc. 

[csx]

Im not against the idea. 

[kungfoodude]

Curious to know what was offered. Decent draft picks should be what we want.

[csx]

3 minutes ago, ProcessBlue2 said:

Do it. Get something out of it. Either way he is probably done after this season. Maybe we can get some LB or secondary depth out of it. 
 

Renfrow is the same type of player on a less talented level. 
 

Give McMillan, Legette, and Coker the top 3. Gives you a path to also keep Renfrow, Horn, Tremayne, etc. 

Thielen is a tall air yards guy. Renfrow is a short yac receiver. Not too much in common really.

[Fenrir]

For a mid-round draft pick, you absolutely have to make this move. AT has been good, but he’s losing a step each season and his value will never be higher.

[Skack25]

Yea send us Ivan Pace back haha

[PantherBoy95]

I'd do it; as long as the pick is right. I think a 4th and if we're lucky a future later round pick would be great.

I love what Thielen brings, but we're pretty deep at WR now (and it's actual young talent with a lot of promise), I'd miss his veteran presence and reliability though for sure.

[outlaw4]

I'd ask for a king's ransom. An extra draft pick would be nice, but this receiver room's only real vet without Thielen would be Moore, and that's if we keep him around. 

[LinvilleGorge]

6 minutes ago, outlaw4 said:

I'd ask for a king's ransom. An extra draft pick would be nice, but this receiver room's only real vet without Thielen would be Moore, and that's if we keep him around. 

Renfrow

[MHS831]

We should do it--we are loaded at WR.  Keeping him on the roster means we cannot add a young guy--let Renfrow be the old veteran-and add some draft capital.  We are not winning a super bowl this year, but we are another draft (like this one) away from becoming relevant--when AT would be gone.  I worry about Bryce's development too, but maybe have AT gone will HELP his development.

XL, TMac, Coker, Renfrow, Horn, Moore, AND Brycen Tremaine is probably better WR depth than we have ever had at the position.  

[Jay Roosevelt]

The only reason I'd be open to this is because I feel like Hunter Renfrow can play the same role that Thielen has the last couple years. But I certainly wouldn't ship him off for a late round pick or anything. He's far more valuable to us than that.

[outlaw4]

9 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Renfrow

If the idea is for Renfrow to take Thielen's place... I'd feel more comfortable if I felt Renfrow can actually play an entire season of football. 

Again, what are we getting in return? Just saying if we got a fourth for Mingo...

[kungfoodude]

5 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

We should do it--we are loaded at WR.  Keeping him on the roster means we cannot add a young guy--let Renfrow be the old veteran-and add some draft capital.  We are not winning a super bowl this year, but we are another draft (like this one) away from becoming relevant--when AT would be gone.  I worry about Bryce's development too, but maybe have AT gone will HELP his development.

XL, TMac, Coker, Renfrow, Horn, Moore, AND Brycen Tremaine is probably better WR depth than we have ever had at the position.  

I am gonna push back on this "loaded" notion. There are some potentially nice pieces here but I don't think "loaded" is a word many in the NFL would use about us. 

Could it be? Maybe.

[LinvilleGorge]

4 minutes ago, outlaw4 said:

If the idea is for Renfrow to take Thielen's place... I'd feel more comfortable if I felt Renfrow can actually play an entire season of football. 

Again, what are we getting in return? Just saying if we got a fourth for Mingo...

I'd say Renfrow would take his place in the locker room, moreso Coker on the field.