Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PFF grades from last night...Ransom had a night


Captain Morgan
 Share

Recommended Posts

And also, regarding Perkins…. I literally told one of my buddies, his first three throws last night were better than any and every throw Plummer attempted for two whole seasons.  That tells you all you need to know.

If the BY experiment goes off the rails early, I would love to see Perkins get some reps.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, TD alt said:

Hell, I said it may be the game thread. Bryce P. already looked better than Plummer, if not Dalton. With some time in the system, he should easily be a decent backup.

Yep he needs to be the guy moving forward unless a really good surprise cut falls our way 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Captain Morgan said:

and so did Perkins.  I want him for QB3 and QB2 in the near future.

Edgar Salmingo, Jr. ✌🏽
@PanthersAnalyst
·
2h
PFF's highest-graded #Panthers on offense for preseason game 3 v. the Steelers: (min: 15 snaps)

🥇 QB Bryce Perkins - 79.5
🥈 TE Dominque Dafney - 73.7
🥉 RB Emani Bailey - 71.1
4️⃣ WR David Moore - 69.4
5️⃣ RB Raheem Blackshear - 65.0

Watch Bailey--he is playing, imo, better than Blackshear

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, TD alt said:

Hell, I said it may be the game thread. Bryce P. already looked better than Plummer, if not Dalton. With some time in the system, he should easily be a decent backup.

Perkins passes were tight and mostly accurate when he had time to throw. Impressed with him only have a couple practices. I think Plummer was looking over his shoulder last night and was straight up awful. Even his touchdown pass looked pretty bad. Perkins should make the practice squad over Plummer. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, gakonline said:

Perkins passes were tight and mostly accurate when he had time to throw. Impressed with him only have a couple practices. I think Plummer was looking over his shoulder last night and was straight up awful. Even his touchdown pass looked pretty bad. Perkins should make the practice squad over Plummer. 

That sky ball that hung in space forever would've certainly been picked by a first team unit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Proudiddy said:

I didn’t listen to his interview, as I had the volume down, but that is awesome.  I’m kind of hyped about safety bc I think Richardson is also a helluva player in his own right.

Same I think Randsom is a baller..... hopefully we don't have to suffer through 4-8 games of Scott blowing azz to get him on the feild.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Moehrig basically straight up said during his 2nd half sideline interview that Ransom should be the other starting safety. 

Yeah, caught that, raised an eyebrow...

I know there's been a lot of speculation that we're going to try to acquire another starting safety before week one. Don't know how seriously to take that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is a question.  Could Coby White be a solid replacement for Ball? Seems he could be an upgrade. Seems he played well in replacement of Ball.  I normally get the highlights and don't get to see any games but I liked when White was on on the court. 
    • Honestly, the guy does a TON of good research. His videos are always high quality and his insight is always stellar.  This video however changed my mind...dramatically about the draft.  Anyone who's seen my opinions knows Im a all in BPA guy, HOWEVER, this kind of changed my mind...Im now a BPA...at position of value dictated by the board.  A lot of words to say, weighted average is important. We all all know that having a good qb on a rookie contract is important, but what about a good edge...or reciever...or tackle?  THOSE things make a different and this opened my eyes to that.  With that said, not that I think we SHOULD go receiver in the first, HOWEVER, IT DOES MAKE SENSE.  If you have good young recievers coming in on rookie contracts, then you have more to build the rest of the roster at a lower cost.  If we were a team loaded at Receiver then things would be different, however, we only truly have 2 reliable WRs, so would another Receiver be a bad pick...I actually dont think so now based on value going forward.  Its just something to consider for everyone.    
    • Yeah, it's fool's gold. Darnold always had the tools. He just needed a tram with an elite D, a top 5 WR, and a Super Bowl MVP RB to carry him so he wouldn't be asked to press where he becomes a turnover machine. Darnold settled in once he was in a situation where he could just be a very talented game manager. People try to tell themselves Bryce can do that without realizing that Darnold still forces the D to respect the throws he can make that the coaches would rather he not attempt where as Bryce simply doesn't have the physical ability to force that respect opening up other opportunities. Like Parcells said leading up to the draft that based on his physical tool set "he better walk on water". What he was politely trying to say is that Bryce simply doesn't have an NFL physical tool set.
×
×
  • Create New...