Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PFF grades from last night...Ransom had a night


Recommended Posts

And also, regarding Perkins…. I literally told one of my buddies, his first three throws last night were better than any and every throw Plummer attempted for two whole seasons.  That tells you all you need to know.

If the BY experiment goes off the rails early, I would love to see Perkins get some reps.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, TD alt said:

Hell, I said it may be the game thread. Bryce P. already looked better than Plummer, if not Dalton. With some time in the system, he should easily be a decent backup.

Yep he needs to be the guy moving forward unless a really good surprise cut falls our way 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Captain Morgan said:

and so did Perkins.  I want him for QB3 and QB2 in the near future.

Edgar Salmingo, Jr. ✌🏽
@PanthersAnalyst
·
2h
PFF's highest-graded #Panthers on offense for preseason game 3 v. the Steelers: (min: 15 snaps)

🥇 QB Bryce Perkins - 79.5
🥈 TE Dominque Dafney - 73.7
🥉 RB Emani Bailey - 71.1
4️⃣ WR David Moore - 69.4
5️⃣ RB Raheem Blackshear - 65.0

Watch Bailey--he is playing, imo, better than Blackshear

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, TD alt said:

Hell, I said it may be the game thread. Bryce P. already looked better than Plummer, if not Dalton. With some time in the system, he should easily be a decent backup.

Perkins passes were tight and mostly accurate when he had time to throw. Impressed with him only have a couple practices. I think Plummer was looking over his shoulder last night and was straight up awful. Even his touchdown pass looked pretty bad. Perkins should make the practice squad over Plummer. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, gakonline said:

Perkins passes were tight and mostly accurate when he had time to throw. Impressed with him only have a couple practices. I think Plummer was looking over his shoulder last night and was straight up awful. Even his touchdown pass looked pretty bad. Perkins should make the practice squad over Plummer. 

That sky ball that hung in space forever would've certainly been picked by a first team unit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Proudiddy said:

I didn’t listen to his interview, as I had the volume down, but that is awesome.  I’m kind of hyped about safety bc I think Richardson is also a helluva player in his own right.

Same I think Randsom is a baller..... hopefully we don't have to suffer through 4-8 games of Scott blowing azz to get him on the feild.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Moehrig basically straight up said during his 2nd half sideline interview that Ransom should be the other starting safety. 

Yeah, caught that, raised an eyebrow...

I know there's been a lot of speculation that we're going to try to acquire another starting safety before week one. Don't know how seriously to take that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean you literally are attempting to justify our -60 differential as unimportant in your first post in this thread. Well, having a negative point differential(to the tune of -3.8/ppg) through 11 games is a very strong indicator of being a bad team. If anything, we have largely been overachieving stastically.  The on field results also bear that out. So if we end up, and I think this is likely, as a 7-8 win team, with an even more substantially negative point differential at the end of this season how would this statistic not matter? Point differential is the most basic statistic in existence that one can look at to largely guage the results. You do need to score more than your opponent to win.
    • Yeah, it is wild that we keep clawing back and thriving with all these different lineup combos and players coming and going. Say what you want about how some things have gone over the past few years but our roster construction is exceptional. We really have loaded up on guys in free agency and through the draft that really fit Rod's system. It's gonna come down to the usual things, I think. Can we elevate our play in the playoffs? That's the big thing we have lacked. Eventually we just hit an opponent that can dig deeper and scrap harder than us.  It's funny because we always have these teams we cannot seem to get past in the playoffs(Bruins, Tampa, NYR, Florida) that we eventually outlast and outbuild. I guess possiblu that will be the way we win a Cup in the end. Just outlast and outbuild them all.
    • I wouldn take Nystrom allll day over Reilly. He is a gem. 7th rounder that bought in and is playing great.  The injury’s on D actually got him the playing time he needs. He will be a cane for a long time. 
×
×
  • Create New...