Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Message to the 2025 Panthers Front Office

CRA

By CRA,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

TylerDurden Grand Master

TylerDurden

Posted
Posted
37 minutes ago, CRA said:

It's totally the Panthers way to put out someone week 1 who isn't a punt returner in the NFL and just pray.....

It's like Donald Trump and Joe Biden had a baby....and then that baby was dropped on it's head.  That's the Panthers. 

I’m not worried about PR.  Horn did it some in college, but even watching him in preseason, he’s a natural at it.  He has shiftiness and playmaking ability naturally as well.  
 

but I absolutely do think HR, nursing a hammy or not, should 1000% be on this roster over Moore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, CRA said:

high drop %, horrific YAC per reception , and doesn't get open.  David Moore doesn't actually do anything well. 

He is a ST team warm body. 

There are reasons we are the worst team in all of pro sports.  It the decision makers.  I mean, forget Renfrow.  Moore still being on this roster highlights all you need to know about why we stink.  Easily better options everywhere to upgrade over dudes.  Now multiple it out.  If they can upgrade the glaringly east stuff.  You know they can't do it elsewhere. 

 

We'll see. I'll be keeping tabs on the snap counts for Moore versus the younger receivers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, Proudiddy said:

I’m not worried about PR.  Horn did it some in college, but even watching him in preseason, he’s a natural at it.  He has shiftiness and playmaking ability naturally as well.  
 

but I absolutely do think HR, nursing a hammy or not, should 1000% be on this roster over Moore.

I got no issue w/ Horn taking a spot. I don't love him as a week 1 PR guy though. 

I mean, if they cut Renfrow and Moore? I'd be like......sucks but I get it.  Moore being on the roster just highlights negatives about our decision makers....and you know it isn't going to just be Moore where they exercise their bad decision making.  We are where we are because of it.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PadresPanthersFan Experienced

PadresPanthersFan

Posted
Posted

I've seen moore around the NFL for years. He offers nothing dozens of other players can do with 0 upside.

Renfrow IMHO offered slightly more with wayyy more upside and reasons to root for him and the team. 

That being said we are getting upset about a 5th or 6th wr. 

That also being said he'll probably sign with someone else, ball out and we can all say told you so

Link to comment
Share on other sites
frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted (edited)
49 minutes ago, Joe Bear said:

As bad as he was, I was more impressed with Bryce as a rookie than XL as a rookie.

Makes no sense. Bryce Young as a rookie at times looked like a fish out of water as an NFL QB.

XL despite his issues with the drops was getting open and blowing past defensive backs.

Definitely noticing a tendency from certain people who harp on XL more than others.

Edited by frankw
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      That's it. How do you feel about this draft class.

      By strato · Posted

      I was watching a YouTube and it was said that scout and GM insider types were saying the NIL had killed rounds 4-7. I don’t know that I buy it, seems like it might for a year or maybe two but then those guys have to move on.  NCAA is apparently about to give 5 years of eligibility. It is gonna skew those entrants older maybe.   
    • ForJimmy
      Panthers attempted to trade up with Ravens?

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • tukafan21
      Panthers attempted to trade up with Ravens?

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...