Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Former RB Mike Davis on Rhule and CMC


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, WUnderhill said:

There was one post pooed in this entire thread and you seemed to be having trouble connecting the dots. Just trying to help out.

Speaking of connecting the dots. In actuality the poo function itself used to be only merely symbolic. It was changed to reflect neg rep as a counter measure for truly egregious posts spammers and rude rival fans. But there are unfortunately a few people who use it solely for personal retribution on a fairly regular basis now. If that sounds like an unhealthy toxic personality that's because it is. Glad I could help you connect those dots.

  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, WUnderhill said:

Everybody can speak for themselves, but my guess is you got poo’ed for immediately reverting to the “Do you work for the Tepper’s” comment in an otherwise normal discussion.

I've got him on ignore, but if I happen to see his histrionics being quoted and see the usual personal attacks I go and give it the poo it deserves. 😛

If it bothers him that much he could try being less unpleasant, or put me on ignore as a mod requested. At the very least, he could stop insulting others just because he's not capable of understanding and accepting any scenario other than the one he feels validates him.

 

Rhule-wise... Teddy tried to warn us. People wanted to hate him because he wasn't Cam though.

Mike Davis, in the same episode, was highly complimentary of how former players are treated by the team. That was cool to hear.

Edited by Icege
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/27/2025 at 8:25 PM, frankw said:

Speaking of connecting the dots. In actuality the poo function itself used to be only merely symbolic. It was changed to reflect neg rep as a counter measure for truly egregious posts spammers and rude rival fans. But there are unfortunately a few people who use it solely for personal retribution on a fairly regular basis now. If that sounds like an unhealthy toxic personality that's because it is. Glad I could help you connect those dots.

And of course I had to poo this. It’s an online message board. It ain’t that deep, it’s supposed to be fun. We’re supposed to banter, we’re supposed to have nemeses. And when it comes to petty misguided radicals like yourself I’ll poo you every time and buy you a drink in person. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/27/2025 at 10:20 PM, Icege said:

 

Rhule-wise... Teddy tried to warn us. People wanted to hate him because he wasn't Cam though.

Mike Davis, in the same episode, was highly complimentary of how former players are treated by the team. That was cool to hear.

People also were just bending over their backs to defend everything about Matt Rhule.   I think the lack of reporting/eyeballs because of COVID made that defense possible because there was really no way to know what was going on in house then given how limited things were. 

I think going into that next season when camps were back open to the reporters, with Teddy's messaging in my mind, it was pretty glaring how in over his head Matt Rhule was if you wanted to see it.  For awhile it was always some else's fault.  Teddy was the idiot.  Then it was Joe Brady.   Took folks longer than it should of to be like.....oh wait, it's the head guy running the show that doesn't know what he is doing. 

I also don't think Matt Rhule is the villain some want him to be.  I think generally speaking, most of Rhule's players liked him as a human.  He just had no clue how to do the NFL thing.   Tepper just can't get it right.  Rhule was the HC that needed Jim Caldwell/Capers.   Then he gave that to the HC that didn't need it in Frank.  But I do think through all the hires and fires, you can see evidence of Tepper trying to get the puzzle. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/27/2025 at 1:32 PM, Captain Morgan said:

i was real lols when Mike said "that was selfish."  Looks like it wasn't CMC's fault though.

Those seasons, our offensive wasn't as good as it could have been because every play was basically, "give the ball to CMC"

While CMC did perform well in that circumstance, he could have been so much better if giving him the ball wasn't 80% of our play calls

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, AceBoogie said:

And of course I had to poo this. It’s an online message board. It ain’t that deep, it’s supposed to be fun. We’re supposed to banter, we’re supposed to have nemeses. And when it comes to petty misguided radicals like yourself I’ll poo you every time and buy you a drink in person. 

Sounds like mental illness to me.

Hope it gets better for you bud.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It seems the needs for the Panthers are at positions that tend to require intelligence to lift others--going from "good to great"--FS, ILB, and C--as you say. While i like Rodriguez a lot (can see the Hurricanes [Jarvis] and Panthers with a mustache player to get the fans into it)--I also like Golday (WLB?).  However, take a look at smallish Kyle Louis (Pitt).  He is known to be cerebral, but he is small (5'11" I think) and for that, I moved him lower.  But look at the different LB events at the combine--he is near the top in most of them.  I see him as a sleeper.  So if we wait until the second round, we can get a solid LB.   So what if we grab a free agent edge specialist (veteran) for pass situations and help develop Princely.  We draft FS (Oregon) first--maybe trading back to do so--I dunno.  We sign a free agent ILB and draft a rookie like Rodriguez or Louis.  In the third, we could probably find a center, like (former OT Parker from Duke) or Slaughter or Pew (may have to trade up).   So, as you say, others are fighting for Edge players, WRs, and OTs early like seagulls on the beach fighting over spilled corn chips, We sit back, grab intelligent players that make others better.  FS, ILB, and C. OT scares me more that Edge if we do this--but for those screaming for an edge--we have edge players--2 with starting experience who have had some degree of success.  JC Davis can play either T spot and he is good at pass blocking--a bit raw--but could be developmental depth that could play in a pinch. Or you could draft a solid OT with shorter arms that are driving them down into day 3--and convert them to G or C later.  Nijman and BC being re-signed could provide enough to hold down the job until a developmental OT (World, Oregon?) prepares for a shot at it.  Wagner (ND) could play LT but is probably a future RT--he is expected to be drafted early day 3.  My favorite day 3 OT sleeper?  Keagan Trost, Missouri. Great run blocker, soild pass blocker in SEC--just shorter arms.  Maybe a guard down the road, but for the time being, a T.  Not ideal, but at least you are building for the future.  
    • I'm not like most people in this thread in regards to Love. I'm not like most in regards to RBs either. I think certain ones will always be drafted in the first round because they are valued that highly. From an on-the-field perspective, they are as valued as ever; business-wise and contract-wise at times to re-up, that's where things can get tricky with valuation. That being said, Love oozes potential and makes higher-ups' mouths water. I know that he if somehow he is available at 19, he will be considered if not taken. You don't leave that type of talent on the board unless there is another compelling player of arguably equal or more value at another position of need that may have a higher priority (like maybe Sonny Styles). Now all that being said, I  don't realistically see either one of them being there at 19 according to the draftniks.
×
×
  • Create New...