Parsons to Green Bay

[WhoKnows]

4 hours ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

I saw two 1st rounders. Didn't see any additional picks so far. Fittershits was exceptionally stupid for rejecting the Rams offer for Burns. 

HFS. We got offered more for Burns and people were happy we turned it down only to get a 2nd and change a year later. SMH, it was so damn obvious that we should have made the deal. Burns has never taken over games like Parsons has.

[Hoenheim]

2026 draft is shaping up to be extremely interesting now, we have the Cowboys, Rams, and Browns all with 2 first rounders next year in what people are assuming to be a QB laden draft. 

Cowboys better hope Ezeraku ends up being extremely good. They didn't just lose Micah Parsons this off season, they also lost Demarcus Lawrence.   And iirc their best linebacker Overshown went down partway through the season last year. Trevon Digs (CB) is coming back from a major injury. 

They might have an absolutely abysmal defense this year.  Jerry really fuged them by giving Dak his most recent contract.  They could have traded his ass too and did a hard reboot .

Edited 10 hours ago by Hoenheim

[Hoenheim]

5 hours ago, Basbear said:

47 million per?!?!?!

 

 

That's Quarterback money, insanity . If green bay doesnt make the super bowl during this contract they gave him, its basically a failure with that level of compensation of money and picks.  

Edited 10 hours ago by Hoenheim

[ECHornet]

16 minutes ago, Hoenheim said:

That's Quarterback money, insanity . If green bay doesnt make the super bowl during this contract they gave him, its basically a failure with that level of compensation of money and picks.  

I mean, every team has the same amount of money to spend, and almost all will fail to win the Super Bowl regardless of how they spend it. Now, if Parsons isn’t in the running for DPOTY every year and win it at least once over the next four years, it’s a failure. 

[csx]

 

29 minutes ago, ECHornet said:

I mean, every team has the same amount of money to spend, and almost all will fail to win the Super Bowl regardless of how they spend it. Now, if Parsons isn’t in the running for DPOTY every year and win it at least once over the next four years, it’s a failure. 

If he helps them win a super bowl the individual award is irrelevant.

Edited 9 hours ago by csx

[SmokinwithWilly]

2 hours ago, WhoKnows said:

HFS. We got offered more for Burns and people were happy we turned it down only to get a 2nd and change a year later. SMH, it was so damn obvious that we should have made the deal. Burns has never taken over games like Parsons has.

A competent GM could have turned that Burns trade into 4 or 5 day 1 picks and still ended up with BY. Fitts was just so fugging bad. 

[PleaseCutStewart]

7 hours ago, Shocker said:

I just saw an interview between Steven A and Jerry Jones and holy smokes.  Jerry looks at least 150 years old.  This man is hideous.  Wow

Yeah.. I felt like he looked 80 years old like 30 years ago... Dude has aged terribly and I feel like he has to be pretty close to death's doorstep

[BIGH2001]

4 hours ago, Hoenheim said:

That's Quarterback money, insanity . If green bay doesnt make the super bowl during this contract they gave him, its basically a failure with that level of compensation of money and picks.  

There’s no way it will work out, it never does. See: Deshaun Watson and, going a little further back for a better comparison, Khalil Mack. Super Bowl teams aren’t built on a huge free agency splash signings. This will be more of a distraction than anything else. Unless it’s a multiple SB winning QB (and there’s only one of those right now) no one player is worth this kind of capital to acquire.

[Little Goody Two Shoes]

Great, with those 1st round picks, watch the Cowboys draft the next Micah Parsons. 

[*FreeFua*]

If you think you have your franchise QB and the Packers clearly believe they do this was a good trade to make for them

2 1sts and washed Kenny Clark for a bonafide hall of famer entering his prime 

If our FO truly believe Bryce was 100% that guy then this was a move we should’ve made. Micah Parsons is as special as it gets on the defensive side of the ball

Edited 2 hours ago by *FreeFua*

[ECHornet]

6 hours ago, csx said:

 

If he helps them win a super bowl the individual award is irrelevant.

Of course, but not winning the Super Bowl doesn’t automatically make this a poor deal. If Parsons wins DPOTY each of the next four years, I wouldn’t view the contract as a failure. 
 

To me, there are two ways this contract isn’t a massive failure:

1) win a Super Bowl

2) Parsons is the most dominant defensive player over the next 4 years

[Move the Panthers to Raleigh]

12 hours ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

And to think we could have traded burns, a pass rusher much worse than Parsons, for almost the same as Parsons...

God we blew that chance 

That will haunt me for a long time