Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Coker to IR; Renfrow signed to 53


amcoolio
 Share

Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, uncfan888 said:

We signed renfrow for league minimum only to cut him and then sign him back for a contract worth up to 3 million

 

Lol

Posted this earlier it was in Renfrows best interest to get cut. But fug the Panthers. I cashed out my comeback player of the year bet for even money because of this nonsense. Should have had him on the original 53. I'm sure te 4 james mitchell would have been just fine to lose instead of costing yourself an extra 3 million to bring hunter back

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, frankw said:

Thielen took a paycut to leave. He wanted out.

He took a paycut AFTER he left.

But PLEASE let it come out that the Vikings and Thielen's agent had a secret discussion we didn't permit about Thielen taking a paycut if they made the trade.

Would end up netting us another draft pick in the end.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

he made it known he wanted out per Morgan, this was never going to end well for the panthers

I don’t care. Morgan should not care either. We got a 4th it wasn’t like we got a haul. You stay and play or stay and sit out. No damn reason to just let him do what he wants because we want to be a nice FO and look good to other players. So stupid 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

Renfrow really didn’t look good during those preseason games

Justin Jefferson would look bad if I was throwing balls to him. 

preseason game issue clearly a bad QB issue.   Multiple hospital balls and throws to wrong routes 

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jb2288 said:

I don’t care. Morgan should not care either. We got a 4th it wasn’t like we got a haul. You stay and play or stay and sit out. No damn reason to just let him do what he wants because we want to be a nice FO and look good to other players. So stupid 

A 4th is a decent return plus dumping part of his cap hit. You aren’t getting a 3rd for a WR his age on his last year. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jb2288 said:

We didn’t have to trade him. He was under contract. I hate this poo about “doing a vet a solid”. Do the fuggin team a solid instead. 

In theory I agree with you. But in practical terms it's not realistic. And the team got something for him rather than nothing at all.

5 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

He took a paycut AFTER he left.

But PLEASE let it come out that the Vikings and Thielen's agent had a secret discussion we didn't permit about Thielen taking a paycut if they made the trade.

Would end up netting us another draft pick in the end.

Don't hold your breath on getting anything from a league office that enthusiastically allowed our only MVP in franchise history to be headhunted multiple times on national television.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Today, we are all Kucci... I miss our feral Russian attack goalie!
    • That was a good segment. Watched every minute of it and would highly recommend it to all fans.
    • "So much of what the Panthers are going to do next week isn't dictated by their preference, but by what happens above them. That's another benefit of not getting locked into need. For instance, if you're thinking you want a receiver, seeing five or six of them go off the board and reacting by taking the sixth or seventh off your list instead of the first (or second or third) something else isn't necessarily wise." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-back-into-the-weeds-of-the-nfl-draft-bryce-young-charlotte-hornets-mock-draft This is what some don't seem to get, I don't care how many times it is said: You're NOT going to draft an inferior person at one position, just because that position is perceived as, or is in fact, a bigger need. That would basically nullify, or at least lessen, the reason why you set yourself up via free agency to be able to take the BPA/BAP on the board in the first place.  Yes, the process is complex, very much involved and ongoing, but the overall philosophy is not rocket science. You set yourself up in order not to be pigeonholed into taking a lower graded player at the expense of a higher graded one. This is why Morgan, Gantt and countless of others say the same thing. This is why it's just nonsensical to set yourself in a position where you don't have to, but then act like you have to come hell or high water: "Oh, we have to draft [whatever position], and we can't draft [this position]."  I'm good with whatever they do, until proven otherwise, but even then, you have to be mature enough to know that drafting is an imperfect exercise, filled with hits and misses. And, you generally don't know if you've hit, and especially missed, right away. Moreover, like I've said before, sometimes two players--different positions or not--can both be hits on their respective teams, so in that sense, it's not purely about a right or wrong pick as much as it's about putting puzzle pieces together at the time the best way that you know how.  At the end of the day, people are going to believe what they want to believe, but one thing that's true is that what the Panthers do regarding the draft is dependent upon what others do, and what others do can and does change things. That being the case, it's just another reason why you can't go in with tunnel vision. The thought of doing that is preposterous.
×
×
  • Create New...