Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Will the Real Shady Please Stand Up?


CPcavedweller
 Share

Recommended Posts

i think he could be decent with a strong pass pro o line and running game.  our o line melted when they started playing normal nfl defense again and got out of prevent.  Not many qbs can succeed when they know you have to throw and cant get 2 seconds clean in the pocket.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/14/2025 at 7:12 PM, KSpan said:

Which is not a particularly high bar in and of itself.

Dude threw for almost 400 yards, and carried the offense on all of the second half touchdown drives. On the last one we only ran once in 13 plays and still scored. That is called "asserting your will". Typically it's in the run game, but we managed it passing. 

If Canales can somehow find a way to also run the ball, the Panthers probably win that game because the final drive wouldn't have been such a cluster fug. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, CPcavedweller said:

Dude threw for almost 400 yards, and carried the offense on all of the second half touchdown drives. On the last one we only ran once in 13 plays and still scored. That is called "asserting your will". Typically it's in the run game, but we managed it passing. 

If Canales can somehow find a way to also run the ball, the Panthers probably win that game because the final drive wouldn't have been such a cluster fug. 

It amazes me that people still fall for Bryce padding stats against prevent defense. He looked like trash to start off the game because the Cardinals were running their game plan. Once up big they started focusing on containment with their rush and soft zone coverage just to avoid giving up chunk plays. Why? I don't know. NFL coaches for the most part are just super conservative and risk averse. Let's stop doing what's working spectacularly because we're scared. As soon as they were forced to abandon the prevent D and go back to playing aggressively Bryce went right back to looking like trash again immediately.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CPcavedweller said:

Dude threw for almost 400 yards, and carried the offense on all of the second half touchdown drives. On the last one we only ran once in 13 plays and still scored. That is called "asserting your will". Typically it's in the run game, but we managed it passing. 

If Canales can somehow find a way to also run the ball, the Panthers probably win that game because the final drive wouldn't have been such a cluster fug. 

lol. 

3rd quarter - The Cardinals were up 24 points and Carolina got to touch the ball once.  Here is what the Cards set up for them in the 3rd quarter to eat clock.  

run

TE checkdown

TE checkdown

run

run 

RB check down

TE checkdown 

run

TE checkdown

incomplete

TE checkdown

run

now they finally arrive end at the 4 yard line and finally hits a WR , and he hits Renfrow in the endzone.  

THAT is not asserting your will.  That's not NFL QB play.  That is the Cardinals allowing a bad team to bleed the clock and take up the entire quarter. 

 

  • Pie 6
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It amazes me that people still fall for Bryce padding stats against prevent defense. He looked like trash to start off the game because the Cardinals were running their game plan. Once up big they started focusing on containment with their rush and soft zone coverage just to avoid giving up chunk plays. Why? I don't know. NFL coaches for the most part are just super conservative and risk averse. Let's stop doing what's working spectacularly because we're scared. As soon as they were forced to abandon the prevent D and go back to playing aggressively Bryce went right back to looking like trash again immediately.

Poor football IQ from those who think Bryce "balled out".

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bryce had three drives that mattered in that game.  The first two which resulted in turnovers and made it a multi score deficit and the last drive which was as ugly and as incompetent as it could be.  Everything in between was basic soft strategic concession by the Cardinals.  They almost played too loose and flirted with concern, so they locked in one last time and made BY9 look like a bum despite multiple friendly whistles.  

Edited by Newtcase
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, CPcavedweller said:

Dude threw for almost 400 yards, and carried the offense on all of the second half touchdown drives. On the last one we only ran once in 13 plays and still scored. That is called "asserting your will". Typically it's in the run game, but we managed it passing. 

If Canales can somehow find a way to also run the ball, the Panthers probably win that game because the final drive wouldn't have been such a cluster fug. 

The multiple posts above me pretty much said it all.

Arizona did literally everything in their power to gift the game to Carolina, which is why Bryce padded some stats, and Bryce and the team STILL couldn't get it done. Dude is just not good enough to build on, full stop.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a feedback loop...bad playcalls make the players look bad, bad players make the playcalling look bad. It's just a carousel of fk ups to be honest. Someone is chitting down their leg on almost every play and obviously the quarterback is prone to doing that the most since they handle the ball every snap and we leveraged 3 years of our future to get him. 

As bad as we've been I actually do believe they can turn it around, I just don't believe they will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/14/2025 at 7:34 PM, electro's horse said:

Guys. 

Arizona went prevent in the second half and stopped blitzing  

and they all got hurt  

and when it mattered, with the refs on his side, nothing  

 

No matter how many times it’s said, they just can’t hear it or don’t want to.  Either way it’s tiresome having to point it out every single time.  The kid can’t play at this level.  Period.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...