Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

panthers offense 30 of 32 in yards per play


fanpanther
 Share

Recommended Posts

33 minutes ago, frankw said:

Also ironic that just yesterday there were a few people who said that expecting more completed passes beyond a measly 5 yards is basically akin to throwing into double coverage downfield and throwing bombs.

I don’t think I will ever accept that 20 yards is a deep ball. The Red Zone is 20 yards. That is supposed to designate that you are close to the end zone lol. 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, strato said:

I don’t think I will ever accept that 20 yards is a deep ball. The Red Zone is 20 yards. That is supposed to designate that you are close to the end zone lol. 
 

I agree. It's indicative of how much standards have been pushed back just to justify our decision.

But if you ask too many questions about these things the boot lickers come out. I'm looking at you @csx

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, frankw said:

I agree. It's indicative of how much standards have been pushed back just to justify our decision.

But if you ask too many questions about these things the boot lickers come out. I'm looking at you @csx

I hesitated to speak the opinion because of the villagers and theirpitchforks. 

I don’t know when that happened, the 20 yard deep ball. Maybe FF brought it about. 
20 yards for a chunk play, I get that. It’s a nice gain. 

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, strato said:

I hesitated to speak the opinion because of the villagers and theirpitchforks. 

I don’t know when that happened, the 20 yard deep ball. Maybe FF brought it about. 
20 yards for a chunk play, I get that. It’s a nice gain. 

Let them come.

It's a combination of things. The definition of a deep pass will always be what past iterations of football was for many despite what these statistical outlets try to push in order to prop up their newer generations of favorites. But even with all that. It's still situational. It's okay to take what defenses are giving you as long as your guy has the prerequisite physical talent to adapt to a more downfield attack. The problem is when that doesn't exist you need everything to go perfect or the other team to flounder and gift you field position and points. Which is where we're at.

Edited by frankw
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This stat has very little to do with winning games. Philadelphia is 28th at 4.4 and Tampa is 22 at 5.1 but both are undefeated. Meanwhile Dallas is 7th but is at 1-2.

Points  made per game versus points surrendered is the only stat that matters  and we are 19th at around 20 points per game. Not great but a good recovery after week 1. Why aren't we using that stat? I guess because it doesn't look so bad and we need to keep pushing the bad Bryce narrative.

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

This stat has very little to do with winning games. Philadelphia is 28th at 4.4 and Tampa is 22 at 5.1 but both are undefeated. Meanwhile Dallas is 7th but is at 1-2.

Points  made per game versus points surrendered is the only stat that matters  and we are 19th at around 20 points per game. Not great but a good recovery after week 1. Why aren't we using that stat? I guess because it doesn't look so bad and we need to keep pushing the bad Bryce narrative.

JFC. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

just let him go dude, he clearly doesnt get it

I get a lot more than you. Scheme dictates average yards per play for example. If you run a lot like Philly your average yards per play will go down versus a team that passes all the time. And if you only play 3 games  then one outlier like Jacksonville holds more weight than it should. Plus yards per play doesn't correlate to wins for example versus effectiveness in the red zone. So yeah I get it and know that stats like yards per game much like yards per play have little correlation with wins and loses and the final score is the only thing that matters at the end of the day not some BS cherry picked stat.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah the only way current set up is fun is if every year a different tiny school builds a super team and makes a run. You just need 1 rich guy to say you know what would be funny, if I drop 30 million and my school has a shot at a national championship.   They won't ever do it but put some sort of tiered salary cap in place and sign them to 4 year deals. You can only transfer up or down tiers no lateral moves because mean ole coach at texas doesn't play me enough so I'm going to Tennessee. So a player at prairie view can transfer to texas and get paid more or a player from UNC can transfer to UNCG because he isn't getting playing time. If a guy is transferring "up" he can get a salary bump if the team has salary cap space. A guy transferring down has to stay at the same salary as he signed his 4 year deal for so the lower tier team would have to have the cap space to sign him. It would stop the money chasing for lateral moves but allow guys who improve massively at lower schools to make more money as juniors and seniors and hopefully keep more guys in one place because the contract is for 4 years.
    • Bryce youngs first starts for 3 years   51 of 103 49%     153 yards avg 6 ints 2 tds   But this is the year he turns it around
    • His third year was worse than Bryce's third year, significantly so.  And he had a game where he threw for 120 yards, two inteceptions, and had a fumble.  He had multiple games where he threw for more int's than td's.  
×
×
  • Create New...