Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tepper Era Strikes Again!


TylerDurden
 Share

Recommended Posts

This post was shared on Facebook via another Panthers fan and organizer (and former huddler) I’m friends with…. He’s not the guy that wrote it, but shared it.

no fun league indeed.  I just don’t get poo like this at all.  Even on a win, Tepper finds a way to leave fans feeling alienated, violated, frustrated, and disgusted with this franchise.

Smh…

IMG_5078.thumb.jpeg.fb65b0133e558c2f01c1a6ce11b507e2.jpeg

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, hepcat said:

A sign damaged their team loyalty? Not the 38-83 record since Tepper bought the team?

Yeah, that last part is a bit dramatic. “Damaging” team loyalty is weirdly worded.  But, point remains…  that’s a weird fight to pick from the organization.  And why now?  And it can’t “touch” the stadium?  You mean the stadium that the fans paid (and continue to pay) for?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is so much context missing here that I don't have an opinion. Seems like someone is looking for their few minutes of fame and went to rage bait to get recognition over a sign. If a sign cannot be affixed to the wall, and it's been that way since 2015, just hold the sign. I also assume that they were there for the Falcons game, so what changed there? I have a feeling that there is another side to this that isn't being told and as a result, I refuse to take the bait.

Too much rage bait online nowadays. Something happen you don't like? Call Saul, he will make a quality rage bait post which ensures you will get the attention you need to have your needs peddled to.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, CPcavedweller said:

There is so much context missing here that I don't have an opinion. Seems like someone is looking for their few minutes of fame and went to rage bait to get recognition over a sign. If a sign cannot be affixed to the wall, and it's been that way since 2015, just hold the sign. I also assume that they were there for the Falcons game, so what changed there? I have a feeling that there is another side to this that isn't being told and as a result, I refuse to take the bait.

Too much rage bait online nowadays. Something happen you don't like? Call Saul, he will make a quality rage bait post which ensures you will get the attention you need to have your needs peddled to.

I agree.  I’m cautious to engage in many “take up my cause” posts nowadays.  But, this was shared by RoaringRiot’s founder that used to be a prominent guy here.  And he’s always been credible, so I figured it was pretty cut and dry.  I’m sure there is more to it, but idk…  I’m also finding a lot of people in this political and social climate are, as Charlie Murphy famously coined, “habitual line steppers.”  In this case, maybe an over zealous, “security is my life” guy making something his business that really wasn’t?

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CPcavedweller said:

There is so much context missing here that I don't have an opinion. Seems like someone is looking for their few minutes of fame and went to rage bait to get recognition over a sign. If a sign cannot be affixed to the wall, and it's been that way since 2015, just hold the sign. I also assume that they were there for the Falcons game, so what changed there? I have a feeling that there is another side to this that isn't being told and as a result, I refuse to take the bait.

Too much rage bait online nowadays. Something happen you don't like? Call Saul, he will make a quality rage bait post which ensures you will get the attention you need to have your needs peddled to.

I also doubt, if it has been in the rules since 2015 that Tepper would have any part of telling people to go take it down.   I would say that call came from a lot of levels below him.   Its not a new rule, why would you blame Tepper.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tr3ach said:

I also doubt, if it has been in the rules since 2015 that Tepper would have any part of telling people to go take it down.   I would say that call came from a lot of levels below him.   Its not a new rule, why would you blame Tepper.

Because Darth Tepper is the root of all evil in Panther land and must be purged from the galaxy. 

Edited by SmokinwithWilly
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where is this Tepper’s fault? Did he come down and tear down the sign and piss on it? He probably had zero clue it happened and some random stadium worker was trying to be difficult for whatever reason. I doubt he even knows the name of the stadium worker. 
 

Bad owner, yes. But y’all give him too much credit for all these different ways he’s impacting the franchise, I highly doubt he is that clever to find a new way everyday to torment fans. He’s barely been around from what I can tell since the end of 2023. 
 

Y’all have got to stop turning him into the bogeyman, like he’s pacing backing in forth in his office in BOA thinking of new ways to torture the fair weather fans of the Carolina Panthers night and day. He is just not a very good owner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ProcessBlue2 said:

Y’all have got to stop turning him into the bogeyman, like he’s pacing backing in forth in his office in BOA thinking of new ways to torture the fair weather fans of the Carolina Panthers night and day. 

I wish he would. He fugs up everything else so him trying to make Panthers fans miserable would probably actually work out great for us.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure 19 is too high for Rodriguez anymore.  He looks to be moving up boards, but it could be smokescreens.  
    • I see XL this way---great athlete.  Good person.  When we drafted him, we knew he was raw.  One year of WR in college (starting) and in HS, he was a QB, I believe. We knew we would need patience with him.  I think year 3 will be make or break.  He is older, and I think that people with his athletic ability have always been better than those with less---but those with less can become more successful.  Why is that?  in my view, it is mental. XL can learn the mechanics and nuances of playing WR if he becomes focused on it and works at it.  I had the opportunity to talk to Armanti Edwards one day after OTAs (great guy) and he discussed how overwhelming it was.  He seemed shocked.  At that time, I knew that Fox hated the pick (I heard him mock Armanti to another coach when he saw Edwards drop a punt from a jugs machine--then I saw Armanti look back at Fox as if to suggest that he was feeling the pressure to please the coach. We forget that these are kids in their early 20s.  At the time, Fox was a lame duck.  Remember when he had Clausen as the #3 QB and was forced to move him up the ladder?  I liked Fox, but I think the climate and culture was influenced by the politics.  Currently, I see another Wr from SC who is struggling, but he is ina  very nurturing, positive culture. Let's see what happens with XL.  I am frustrated too---but XL was a second round talent who was raw and we traded up to get him.  He had 500 yards as a rookie--lets call 2025 a sophomore slump and see if we can't get at least 50 yards per game out of him.  If not, cut bait.
    • Sadiq feels like a lazy comp.  Sure he would be a big improvement over what we have but at a position we don't and maybe can't (midget qb) utilize.  I hope the staff puts together a list of players you automatically take at 19 (Freeling, Lemon, Downs, Faulk) and if none are there, trade back to look at (Thieneman, McNeil-Warren, Proctor, Lomu, Allen, Iheanachor, Banks, Woods).  I get the people that think an OT would be a waste because we temporarily patched that hole, and ILB and safety are a waste because that is high to take those particular positions, but by trading back we get extra picks to fill every need.  A draft that has an OT, S, ILB, slot WR, and C would really put us in a good position moving forward if we get an extra first three rounds additional pick.   
×
×
  • Create New...