Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Panthers’ Offensive Spending Is Misleading — and Bryce Young Is Paying the Price


cranky
 Share

Recommended Posts

I'd say we did invest in our offensive line with free agents and receivers with draft picks.

With our O-line, Corbett is meh and perpetually hurt while we lost Hunt this year. Also, I feel our pass protection will have really bad moments at times. Given how O-line injuries derailed many Panthers seasons of past, this is fairly typical Panthers luck. That game where Cam got sacked nine times.... oh, boy.

Receivers... this team has been incompetent in drafting them for as long I've been a fan. And you can't blame the QBs because all the busts/bleh receivers didn't suddenly play better with other teams. We seem to be too enamored with projects when we should be seeking guys that can produce. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Id sacrifice a small farm animal to have Jameis running this offense and dave refurbishing him.  It never was about the physical play it was all mental with him.  He doesnt give a poo and thinks he can make every throw.

He's never seen a Post route that he doesn't like. 

1 Safety? 2? fug it, I can fit it in there. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CPF4LIFE said:

I would get excited about jameis. Thats just me. I would still look to get somebody to develop behind him tho. 

Jameis is on a very cheap two year deal and is effectively backing up Jaxson dart and I cannot believe I’m saying this about that white trash little freak.

the nyg qb who’s available is unfortunately Russell Wilson, though I do think a this offense is basically Russell Wilson bullshit lite. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...