Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: Bryce Young ankle injury is “just a one-week injury”


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

30 minutes ago, Super Grateful said:

jesus christ, what weird subforum did I stumble upon where people are talking like Dalton is this incredible back up that is going to throw for 400 yards and 4 TD's like we haven't seen him in this role before, and that there is this master plan to fake Bryce's high ankle sprain in order to bench him during a winning season with favorable stats?

People said it about XL so why not Bryce.

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

You had me until the literal last 2 words of this post

favorable stats?

Bryce is literally in LAST place in passing yards amongst the QBs who have started every week this season.

But sure, I guess you could consider that "favorable"

What about TD to INT ratio? I don’t care about yards he’s not my fantasy QB and Rico been getting us to the red zone lmao.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

God could you imagine the reaction if Canales used this ankle tweak as an opportunity to switch to Dalton and not look back. 
 

“No it’s okay Bryce, just sit this one out, your health is most important, bud”

”Man, you know Andy just looked great with those 200 yards and 2 TDs, we just need to put ourselves in the best situation possible.”

Would be funniest thing ever.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Super Grateful said:

jesus christ, what weird subforum did I stumble upon where people are talking like Dalton is this incredible back up that is going to throw for 400 yards and 4 TD's like we haven't seen him in this role before, and that there is this master plan to fake Bryce's high ankle sprain in order to bench him during a winning season with favorable stats?

The person that said 500 yards was trolling. Some of the responses were not serious. 
If he ends up with 300 or something we are probably getting our butts whipped and it’s garbage time.

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Super Grateful said:

What about TD to INT ratio? I don’t care about yards he’s not my fantasy QB and Rico been getting us to the red zone lmao.

His INT% is about career average(1.9, 2.3, 2.2). It's his TD% that is at a career best(2.1, 3.9, 4.9).

Edited by kungfoodude
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Super Grateful said:

What about TD to INT ratio? I don’t care about yards he’s not my fantasy QB and Rico been getting us to the red zone lmao.

It has nothing to do with Fantasy, he's 10th in pass attempts but something like 27th in yards with the only players below him being QB's who haven't started 7 game this year.

There is just flat out no rational way to say that is a good thing and he's playing well, those two stats are a terrible look when put together.

His TD to INT ratio is "good" because he barely throws anything other than little dink and dunk passes.  I'd be very curious to know what his TD to INT ratio is on passes that were more than 10 yards downfield, I'd bet it isn't near as good.

Edited by tukafan21
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Paa Langfart said:

He has almost as many fumbles already this season as he had all of last season.  At this point it looks like he is regressing with ball security.

I just think defenders know he's fumble prone at this point so there even more emphasis on trying to strip him. It's not like trying to tackle a Cam or Allen or even a Maye or Herbert. You're not really worried about Bryce breaking a tackle and taking off so you're less concerned about securing the tackle allowing you to focus more on trying to get the ball out.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...