Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

BY with another record


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

I'm happy we won and I'd love nothing more for the light bulb to go off but I've seen enough to know we need more talent in that qb room. Purdy and countless other qbs have been more consistent  than Bryce and aren't the answer for their respective  franchise. I'd love that Stat more if he didn't have such a lopsided  win/loss  thing going on. Going to celebrate the win but we need consistency! We should be leading the division  right now and just like he did his part in a couple of our wins, he's done just as much damage in our losses. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

Honest question, how many games in his career has he not even had the opportunity to do this?

If we're down 1 point entering the 4th quarter and we score a TD on the first play of the quarter and then never give up the lead, that counts as a GWD for this stat.

The Falcons shutout this year obviously is one, but outside of that, have we ever entered the 4th quarter with a lead and held it until the game was over?

I'd love to know how many chances Peyton and Allen even had compared to Bryce at the same time frame.

If you look at all our wins, excluding the 30-0 Atalanta win, they are all by three (with some in OT) and one 7 point win against the jets. I think that’s interesting. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, The Lobo said:

If you look at all our wins, excluding the 30-0 Atalanta win, they are all by three (with some in OT) and one 7 point win against the jets. I think that’s interesting. 

Isn't this a young team just learning ways to win? How many times were we on the losing end? Great teams win the tough ones, there's a new culture growing in the building, and it starts with the QB, no matter how many times he is counted out, he Keeps Pounding 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CarolinaReaper said:

Isn't this a young team just learning ways to win? How many times were we on the losing end? Great teams win the tough ones, there's a new culture growing in the building, and it starts with the QB, no matter how many times he is counted out, he Keeps Pounding 

I guess we will see if we are great, I hope we are 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, CarolinaReaper said:

Isn't this a young team just learning ways to win? How many times were we on the losing end? Great teams win the tough ones, there's a new culture growing in the building, and it starts with the QB, no matter how many times he is counted out, he Keeps Pounding 

Yes, young teams need to learn how to win close games.

But an overwhelming number of wins (or losses) in 1 score games is usually more about just better luck than anything else.  It's why those teams with such a drastic W-L record in 1 score games are usually widely predicted by experts to have the opposite happen in the following season, and it goes for both wins or losses (see the Vikings and Chiefs this year for example).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, TN05 said:

No one has ever scrutinized the GWD stat as much as this forum has since Bryce Young started winning games

GWD is the critical stat for an NFL QB. What you need for perspective is GWD %.  This is how many opportunities he converts. 2023 was 12.5%. 2024 was 33.3%. 2025 is 50%. Career is 28.9%.

A consistent playoff winning QB is in the 30% range. A championship caliber QB is in the 40% range. He has been tracking well even with his major limitations under the development of Canales. This is the only reason he is holding on, but he is at the same level of a Derek Carr with the Raiders. Carr was 32.4% GWD in his first 3 seasons with 12 GWD in 37 opportunities.

This gives you perspective on why he is frustrating to evaluate. Carr did what for the Raiders? 2 winning seasons in 9 seasons with 4 different HCs/OCs. This is what we want as Panthers fans? A decade of average with potential and many moments of hope? At least he'll win a QB skill competition like Carr, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Given how any one score game likely results in a GWD, it’s a stat I’ve always thought was a fun fluffer add for guys who were already good to make them sound even more elite.

It’s never just been advertised so heavily, particular for a guy people still aren’t sure about.

its not a stat that just inherently proves he’s great.

That aside, this was a solid game by him. But it wasn’t really until the first 4th throw that really got him in motion. Was pretty frustrating Q1 through half of 2

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Basbear said:

"hater" checking in or super fan..... BY played great. Elements and great rams D, I mean verse is down right horror fuel.

Besides the INT, Panthers D could not stop the rams.....BY and his key 3rd&4th throws helped the Panthers pull off the upset. 

There were 2 INTs and can't forget the strip sack by Brown on Stafford. Defense played a huge part in this game. Without them stepping up when they did, this is a L. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

There were 2 INTs and can't forget the strip sack by Brown on Stafford. Defense played a huge part in this game. Without them stepping up when they did, this is a L. 

Yes sir, 3 TOs(one in the end zone other in the red zone HUGGGGEE!). Still I think the rams only punted once, they could have ran it down the Panthers thoats cause they were getting 6 yards on the bad runs. Panthers D just had no answers.....except GETTING 3 TOS!!!! Big passes 51, 31, just could not stop them. They are the #1 and MVP for a reason, super happy Panthers upset them. 

Edited by Basbear
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
    • Classic example on what AI is not currently good for.  It will create a baseline of statistics (which are fine but must be used alongside tape and other evals) and partner that with every rumor mongering dips*&$t on the web.  
×
×
  • Create New...