Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dan Morgan: “We’ll explore signing Bradley Chubb”


Recommended Posts

Article:

Bradley Chubb is available to sign with any team right now and the prospect of the Panthers pursuing him came up during General Manager Dan Morgan’s press conference at the Scouting Combine on Tuesday. 

Chubb was released by the Dolphins earlier this month, which means a team can add him to their pass rush options before free agency opens at the start of the new league year. The Panthers had 30 sacks during the 2025 season and Morgan said that he doesn’t think a team can ever have enough strong pass rushers in general before answering a question about specific interest in Chubb. 

Morgan said Chubb is “still playing at a really good level” and indicated the team is looking into the possibility of adding him to the defense.

“I don’t think anything is going to be off the table,” Morgan said, via the team’s website. “We’ll explore that, we’ll talk to his agent, but I wouldn’t say anything’s upcoming, but we’ll definitely stay on that, and we’ll see where that goes.”

Chubb missed all of 2024 with a torn ACL, but returned to record 8.5 sacks for the Dolphins last season. Derrick Brown and Nic Scourton tied for the Panthers’ lead by recording five sacks each during the 2025 campaign.

https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profootballtalk/rumor-mill/news/panthers-gm-dan-morgan-well-explore-signing-bradley-chubb

IMG_1246.jpeg

Edited by WarPanthers89
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 I think it is important to have a few veterans to go along with our second-year players.  Here is what AI thinks:  

"Following his expected 2026 release from the Miami Dolphins, 29-year-old pass-rusher Bradley Chubb is projected to land a contract in the range of

$12–14 million per year. Despite recording 8.5 sacks in 2025 after a torn ACL, his age, injury history, and a below-average 11% pass-rush win rate in 2025 indicate he will likely take a pay cut from his previous $18.2 million average.  I think a 3-year, $38m deal would work."

I am back: Expect a better year in 2026 than 2025.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Based on Morgan's comment about "cannot have enough pass rushers" I would say, if we sign a veteran, Edge is still on the table.  Of course, we would then go LB, OT, or...............WR in the first round.  I am still not confident that WR is out of the question.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Generally, especially older guys, it takes two years to be fully back. 
3 years would take him through Scourton and Princely’s deals and if they earn 2nd contracts that is good timing. 
 

Also, watching g the Luke and JJ video I linked in the Luke thread Luke said the LB talent is there in this draft and he expects Morgan to get one. 
I am like, please.  And make it a better pick than Wallace, Dan. Inauspicious debut there, on your linebacker drafting. 

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, MHS831 said:

 Here is what AI thinks:  

Never trust what AI comes back with.  This is what AI generated for me on the topic:

Quote

Nick Chubb should sign with the Carolina Panthers because nothing says legacy move like becoming an instant folk hero in a state that will name a Bojangles combo after you by Week 3. The weather’s warm, the workload’s yours, and the fanbase is so hungry for a bruising, no‑nonsense RB that you’d get MVP chants for a four‑yard gain on 3rd‑and‑2. Plus, the offense needs a grown adult to establish the run, and you look great in blue—scientifically proven, probably.
Anyway, long story short: Nick nods, grabs the pen, signs with Carolina, and immediately becomes the most trusted thing in the state not named sweet tea.


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm for addressing edge in FA. We just drafted two in the 2nd round and they usually take a couple years of development. I don't think another rookie would provide much immediate help and might stretch our development resources thin. I'd rather look for bandaid vets while we continue to focus on developing the young talent already on the roster.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/25/2026 at 9:16 AM, rebelrouser said:

Played w/ Evero in Denver in '22. This one makes sense if the price is right. Then go Oline, ILB, Oline in the draft.  Morgan has yet to draft an offensive lineman.  Crazy. 

Honestly not that crazy. We spent big bucks on our 2 guards and he inherited a team from Fitterer that was completely void of talent at just about every position (while also not having picks because of trades by Fitterer). There are only so many picks we had and you can't fix every position group in a 2 year span

Edited by PleaseCutStewart
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • But that's the point, if the locker room feels that way, then you're going to upset them by still keeping Bryce around and playing him over the Top 10 pick. Again, it goes one of 3 ways... 1. Bryce plays well enough to earn an extension 2. Bryce still sucks and we draft his replacement who starts Week 1 with a new QB as his backup 3. Bryce still sucks, we draft his replacement in the 1st, but they start the season backing up a new vet QB who was brought in to be his mentor. With an OUTSIDE chance at a 4th option where Bryce plays well enough to convince the team to let him play out the 5th year option and then make a decision.  Which I can't see it happening, but there is still a non zero chance of that happening I guess. The only way we draft a QB next year and still have Bryce on the roster, is if we're taking someone in the middle rounds hoping to develop them as a long term backup to Bryce.
    • I hear you. But I am not absolving Legette just because he is from my neck of the woods or anything else.  Tge comment was more about the fans uneven application of blame.  I do agree that there is a noticeable disconnect between him and the QB and that he might do better with a more polished and capable delivery man.  Abd don’t feel that they used XL right, or at least how I expected it to look.  And that could be a function of a reticent WB that shies away from that style of attack. I mean it was either him or Canales that pretty much eliminated downfield from the playbook - even while we see guys running free at times. It Could work if they commit to it.  Whoever isn’t committing. 
    • Lot of passion there.  Look, if Bryce plays down to the level that we feel the need to draft a QB high, you don’t think the locker room might be ready for anything that helps them win?   There are s lot of angles to this that could come into play depending on what happens this year. 
×
×
  • Create New...